Honestly i think your theory is more respectable then some fish coming out of the ocean onto land and evolving into all the species we have now. I do believe in extraterrestrial life but i havent yet formed a solid opinion on how they factor into the history of earth.
And
at myself for spellin extraterrestrial correct on the first try, sometimes i surprise myself
I was being sarcastic breh, i don't believe that mess. Although anything is possible at this point, there's nothing wrong with believing in bullshyt without evidence as long as you acknowledge that its BS from the jump.
And its a little bit more complex than fish simply coming out of the water and morphing into something else like a pokemon breh.
Do a little research on natural selection and understand how it works, it would probably make the concept much easier to grasp. Without a fundamental understanding of natural selection all this will sound foreign.
btw, The fish that scientist think we may have descend from is called Tiktaalik
(or a species similar to it)
Tiktaalik - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ....
and it actually walked. In fact there are species of fish alive today that have the ability to walk on land breh.
You and I
(tetrapods) would not exist today if it wasn't for the blueprints found in these early animals.
The only other real alternative to our origins is that God created man from dirt and mud, and Eve from mans rib
which sounds more believable to u, small gradual change which eventually leads to large change over the course or 4 billion years
or Magic?
(God did it)
