Why are black people so quick to claim mixed race people

[Cadillac]

I'm sure his point was that a black gene isn't inherently more dominant and you just admitted that by saying genetics can overide this so called dominant by nature gene.

We do have the more "dominant" genes. The issue is that because of ADOS' admixture in some of our people/
a portion of ADOS people have a bit of white in them(altho not as much as some like to exaggerate) so that means some have recessive "white" genes.

some of those men iso brought up, have ADOS parents that likely are like that with some white ancestry/recessive genes that played a part in how they look.

Barack Obama, Jordan Peele, Melyssa Ford, Mowry sisters are examples of biracials who were able to retain predominant black admixture and look like black people.

I would say they got lucky and are exemptions because most biracials I’ve seen lose the majority of their color and features.

alot biracials are gonn look like lightskin blacks/or show they have black descent.

likely the ones you saw are children to a ados mother or father fit he mole of what i described ^^^.

 

[Virtuous_Brotha]

We do have the more "dominant" genes. The issue is that because of ADOS' admixture in some of our people/
a portion of ADOS people have a bit of white in them(altho not as much as some like to exaggerate) so that means some have recessive "white" genes.

some of those men iso brought up, have ADOS parents that likely are like that with some white ancestry/recessive genes that played a part in how they look.

alot biracials are gonn look like lightskin blacks/or show they have black descent.

likely the ones you saw are children to a ados mother or father fit he mole of what i described ^^^.

Again just because someone can fit into a box as diverse as black is in America doesn't prove a dominant gene. Rachel dozeal got away with identifying as black which proves how warped this classification is.


These kids look just as white as they do black despite having the so called dominant African gene. Research mixed race east African (horners) well they almost always look 100% white.

 

[Cadillac]

Doesn't make sense to compare biracial to light skinned admixtured Aa's it should be the pure Africans your comparing them with to prove this theory.

These kids are mixed with west African and polish and look equally as white as they fo black you also ignored the reccesive Horner/east African gene.

I was comparing them because the poster who I was responding to was basing his argument on phenotype. So I am just playing the same game he is in regards to going off phenotype and how we would see them in america if we walk down the street.

I didnt ignore shyt, I responded to what you quoted me with. As for your video, as I said they are gonna look lightskin blacks/show black in them. Which they do espescially the daughter. having more dominant genes(dark hair, eye color) doesnt mean they will be devoid of having some feats from their nonblack/recessive gene half. Especially if that father has some of those recessive genes .


Now for your EA point. Maybe they do have recessive genes or something idk. My opinion on "dominant" genes is rooted in the fact darker genes/alleles is more dominant than light . And the basic stuff I know on this

Not so much in the stuff Swagg believes in on the basis of "we black and because"

 

[™BlackPearl The Empress™]

Dr. Dre's wife comes to mind. She's not even mixed with Black and dudes wanna claim her because she tans well. Lol

 

[Virtuous_Brotha]

I was comparing them because the poster who I was responding to was basing his argument on phenotype. So I am just playing the same game he is in regards to going off phenotype and how we would see them in america if we walk down the street.

I didnt ignore shyt, I responded to what you quoted me with. As for your video, as I said they are gonna look lightskin blacks/show black in them. Which they do espescially the daughter. having more dominant genes(dark hair, eye color) doesnt mean they will be devoid of having some feats from their nonblack/recessive gene half. Especially if that father has some of those recessive genes .


Now for your EA point. Maybe they do have recessive genes or something idk. My opinion on "dominant" genes is rooted in the fact darker genes/alleles is more dominant than light . And the basic stuff I know on this

Not so much in the stuff Swagg believes in on the basis of "we black and because"

Of course but the white in then is clear as day too I thought you were making a case that only the black side will show since it's naturally more dominant. Usually you can tell someone is mixed so I'm not sold on that theory