Who had the better career between Adrien Broner and Danny Swift Garcia?

[Dallas' 4 Eva]

Does beating Khan prove he was an overachiever?

Given how slow and cement footed Danny was he had no business beating Khan bro. Lol

 

[jj23]

Delete

 

[patscorpio]

Given how slow and cement footed Danny was he had no business beating Khan bro. Lol

shyt Khan is more of an overachiever to me with that chin of his than Danny lol...this is a cat I thought even Paulie could KO haha

 

[Dallas' 4 Eva]

shyt Khan is more of an overachiever to me with that chin of his than Danny lol...this is a cat I thought even Paulie could KO haha

Now that's just disrespectful.

 

[Sbp]

Broner. He achieved more success and was more popular.

 

[Devil Plisken…CMS]

Depends. Broner is more accomplished, but Danny has a way better resume.

Haha

 

[Devil Plisken…CMS]

Broner didn’t beat ANYBODY

 

[chunky_mcdaniels]

In simple terms DG. He has bread. Broner doesn’t.

AB’s highs are higher though.

DG’s been more consistent, a product of consistency, application and a fear of his father.

 

[torcher]

In simple terms DG. He has bread. Broner doesn’t.

AB’s highs are higher though.

DG’s been more consistent, a product of consistency, application and a fear of his father.

AB’s highs are higher??? He doesn’t have anything close to a Matthyse or Khan on his resume. His biggest wins are debatables with Paulie, Ponce De Leon or Granados.

I don’t even see how this is debatable. Broner is more popular becuz of his antics but Danny has clearly had the better career.

 

[NZA]

garcia is less talented and did a lot with it. broner is more talented and became a clown

 

[<<TheStandard>>]

The only fight I was surprised he won to me was the lucas fight. He actually showed intangibles in that one. Bruh didn't win fights as an underdog for me to think of him as an overachiever

I bet that fight pretty big because I knew Lucas wasn't going to be able to touch him.

Danny was a 2-1 underdog.

Feels like after that fight he stopped fighting anyone and struggled with anyone noteworthy.

 

[<<TheStandard>>]

Broner was never the same after the Maidana fight.

He became gunshy and scared to throw. His power never really moved up past 135 either.

Danny's easily had the better career because he did more with less while Broner just took an asswhooping from Maidana and completely fell apart in and out of the ring.

 

[patscorpio]

I bet that fight pretty big because I knew Lucas wasn't going to be able to touch him.

Danny was a 2-1 underdog.

Feels like after that fight he stopped fighting anyone and struggled with anyone noteworthy.

The thing is Lucas did touch him...I was surprised though Danny took that without going down...I gave Danny full credit for that win because the fight went hard. I knew it was hard when Angel Garcia was super candid in an interview detailing the injuries Danny picked up in that fight.

But I agree shyt changed after that

 

[theflyest]

Given how slow and cement footed Danny was he had no business beating Khan bro. Lol

He was brought in to be an opponent for Khan. Khan was suppose to win that fight.

I don’t even know why anyone goes back and forth with @patscorpio when it comes to the topics of Leonard Ellerbe, Danny Garcia, and Miguel Cotto. He hates these guys so much that you can’t have an objective conversation.

 

[Dallas' 4 Eva]

He was brought in to be an opponent for Khan. Khan was suppose to win that fight.

I don’t even know why anyone goes back and forth with @patscorpio when it comes to the topics of Leonard Ellerbe, Danny Garcia, and Miguel Cotto. He hates these guys so much that you can’t have an objective conversation.

He is the only person I have ever seen say Danny is an underachiever. Like bruh Danny should make the hall of fame just off overcoming how mediocre he is, but @patscorpio thinks he is an underachieve.