Where The Word God Comes From - The Real Origins of Religion Stolen From Egyptians

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Yeah, you won't admit it. Sad.

What's sad is you have provided NO evidence that would satisfy the 'theory' that Egyptians went to West Africa. None.

Nitpicking about the Sahara won't work since it changes size and shape.....but there is no evidence Egyptians crossed it or went along the coast or below the desert to get there.

You are just relying on hope that evidence might someday emerge. It might, but without evidence, you're not going to change my mind.

Speculation is not evidence.

'Could have' and 'might have' are not satisfactory.

​

 

[bouncy]

Breh, you have provided NO evidence that would satisfy the 'theory' that Egyptians went to West Africa. None.

You are just relying on hope that evidence might someday emerge. It might, but without evidence, you're not going to change my mind.

Speculation is not evidence.

'Could have' and 'might have' are not satisfactory.

​

You still didn't admit you were wrong!

You did all the posting in your last post, and it was all wrong. AND THE INFORMATION WAS IN THE DAMN ARTICLE

You aren't who you claim.

The evidence is there, and you still bullshytted

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

You still didn't admit you were wrong!

Because I'm not.

Your article proved nothing.

Nothing you've posted proves anything.

​

 

[bouncy]

Because I'm not.

Your article proved nothing.

Nothing you've posted proves anything.

​

One last chance, because you are looking like a buffoon.

Was Egypt a desert 5,000 years ago?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

One last chance, because you are looking like a buffoon.

Was Egypt a desert 5,000 years ago?

The Sahara dominated North Africa by 5,000 BCE. I don't know where you're getting 'Egypt was a desert'.​

 

[bouncy]

For everyone else here's some more good reading:

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-23947820
New timeline for origin of ancient Egypt

"Previous records suggested the pre-Dynastic period, a time when early groups began to settle along the Nile and farm the land, began in 4000BC. But the new analysis revealed this process started later, between 3700 or 3600BC.

The Palermo Stone is inscribed with the names of early Egyptian kings
The team found that just a few hundred years later, by about 3100BC, society had transformed to one ruled by a king.

Dr Dee told the BBC World Service programme Science in Action: "The time period is shorter than was previously thought - about 300 or 400 years shorter. Egypt was a state that emerged quickly - over that time one has immense social change.

"This is interesting when one compares it with other places. In Mesopotamia, for example, you have agriculture for several thousand years before you have anything like a state."

Archaeologists believe Egypt's first king, Aha, came to power after another prominent leader, Narmer, unified the land.

The team was also able to date the reigns of the next seven kings and queens - Djer, Djet, Queen Merneith, Den, Anedjib, Semerkhet and Qa'a - who with Aha formed Egypt's first dynasty.

The model suggests that King Djer may have ruled for more than 50 years. This is such a long period, it raises the possibility that there may have been other kings or queens of Egypt that we do not know about or that the state may have collapsed and reformed."

 

[bouncy]

The Sahara dominated North Africa by 5,000 BCE. I don't know where you're getting 'Egypt was a desert'.​

Still can't do it!

Gotta play trickery, still!

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Still can't do it!

Gotta play trickery, still!

All I've stated a few times is that there is no evidence Egyptians traveled to West Africa.

You keep responding with 'they could have...' and 'they might have......'.

That is not evidence, that is speculation.​

 

[GetInTheTruck]

Who said be accepted?
It's reasonable because its makes sense if you consider different things, especially when I just gave you multiple links to support my theory. You are just ignoring them. I even explained in depth why I think this, and you still ask me what makes them reasonable!
Do you know what reasonable means? Let me show you:

Reasonable
adjective
1.
agreeable to reason or sound judgment; logical:

I showed why they could have walked to these places within a year. I showed why there could be evidence in the sea. I showed why I think they could have travelled along the coastline to west Africa. I showed why they could have went through the Sahara.

These are four things I gave to help prove my point, yet you ask me what makes my theory reasonable?

Just forget it.

If you freely admit that these are just "what if's" on your part, why are you getting bent out of shape when they are rightly labeled speculation?

spec·u·la·tion
ˌspekyəˈlāSH(ə)n/
noun

1. 1.
   the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence.

Again, let's forget about Egypt for a second, this kind of thinking is exactly the reason why this smart-dumb method of analyzing history will always be an academic dead end in general, and a roadblock for those people who want to study real history and may not know where to start.

 

[Medicate]

@Theraflu @kp404

Get this racist troll outta this thread @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited ....cac has trolled my entire thread with his eurocentric bullshyt.........

This thread was meant for unbrainwashing minds, and this cac came in poisoning the thread with whitewashed already debunked garbage..........

 

[bouncy]

If you freely admit that these are just "what if's" on your part, why are you getting bent out of shape when they are rightly labeled speculation?

spec·u·la·tion
ˌspekyəˈlāSH(ə)n/
noun

1. 1.
   the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence.

Again, let's forget about Egypt for a second, this kind of thinking is exactly the reason why this smart-dumb method of analyzing history will always be an academic dead end in general, and a roadblock for those people who want to study real history and may not know where to start.

Because you both are completely ignoring things I'm using to help prove my point. Be fair, but y'all aren't doing that. Now you come with some "academia" nonsense, when i already stated all I want is people to come back with some creative ideas on what could have happened, but again y'all keep ignoring that part. I think you are one of those "I read a million books the last 50 years, I have all the answer", but can't put two, and two together. Maybe creative thinking is hard for you, and this is why you are missing some of the things I'm implying. I'm not dissing you, but I notice you do this a lot.

And you have no clue what you're talking about, this is exactly how people in academia discover things, they do roundtable discussions, and throw out ideas. Then they come up with a REASONABLE conclusion. Then they go see if it can be validated. It seems to me, yall don't want to think, and get offended when someone else questions the status quo. I have yet to see you come with something creative as to what happened in the past. You just put down others, who do it, and repeat what you read.

You keep saying you are repeating facts, but I just gave evidence some of your "facts" arent facts anymore. That's why I keep writing ALL OF THIS IS THEORY. Evidence is always popping up that debunks what we once thought. Even the scientists who I linked admitted they have to rethink what they thought about Egypt, but you two won't. This is just Egypt, imagine what other stuff is wrong, that y'all swear are concrete facts.

This is AT LEAST the third time I wrote this, but you say "if i freely admit these are what ifs, why am I getting bent out of shape". This tells me y'all are just hard headed, and like to argue, just to be right. shyt is sad.

 

[bouncy]

All I've stated a few times is that there is no evidence Egyptians traveled to West Africa.

You keep responding with 'they could have...' and 'they might have......'.

That is not evidence, that is speculation.​

That isn't all you've stated.

Again, I linked you an article, and because you want to prove me wrong, you took the first few sentences of the article, and twisted it to your benefit, but the whole article was implying the total opposite. You didn't even read the damn article. I really thought you might admit you were wrong, but you keep playing games. Now watch you do it again. Im not going to say how I think you will reply, i want to see if im going to be right, AGAIN!

I'm really done with you now. Peace

 

[Poitier]

@Dafunkdoc_Unlimited you are an idiot, fam.

 

[Samori Toure]

I don't know if anyone mentioned this, but what does every Christian say at the end of a prayer? Amen.

As in Amen-Ra the main God of Egypt.

The funniest part is that most people may not even realize what they are saying.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amun

 

[bouncy]

I don't know if anyone mentioned this, but what does every Christian say at the end of a prayer?

AMEN. As in Amen-Ra the main God of Egypt.

The funniest part is that most people may not even realize what they are saying.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amun

But we only are crazy about Egypt because white people are crazy about it, according to some in here.

The guy in the video mentioned that. I can't remember if it was this exact video, but he has mentioned it before. I like the guy. I might not agree with everything, but for the most part, he makes sense.