What kind of dumb logic is this shyt like this is the reason why the only women we need posting in this subforum are Dora, Thiefypoo, and that one knicks stan Danie or whatever her name. You aint got a single post in the Cavs season thread, just show up in the Finals stinking up the place like a true front runnerAnd they said that LeBron wouldn’t have brought that team to the finals and that they would get blown out in all 4 games. Well Game 1 was close, which shows that this series isn’t going to be that easy for The Warriors. The naysayers are hilarious..
Refs haven't cheated for GS in their last 2 games.
according to the refs.. thompson was ejected for hitting shaun in the head,......EVEN AFTER THE REVIEW
It's as blatant as it's ever been and casuals have their JR Smith story to distract them instead.according to the refs.. thompson was ejected for hitting shaun in the head,......EVEN AFTER THE REVIEW
you got more conspriracy theories than Alex JonesSuns routinely got fukked by the NBA and injuries, while these frauds have only benefited from eternal bullshyt
Bad comparison
So I’m stinking up the place because I’m posting about the finals in the thread about the finals? What kinda dumb ass logic is that. Stop quoting me please.What kind of dumb logic is this shyt like this is the reason why the only women we need posting in this subforum are Dora, Thiefypoo, and that one knicks stan Danie or whatever her name. You aint got a single post in the Cavs season thread, just show up in the Finals stinking up the place like a true front runner
cuz thompson pulled his arm and started raising his hand to take ownership of the call before the whistle..I can understand disagreeing with the charge/block call (I was surprised they reversed the call, personally), but if the NBA was really rigging the game for the Warriors, why was a Cleveland Cavalier player shooting free throws that would've put the team ahead with 4 seconds to play? Seems like a really inept way to rig a game.
Yo you are absolutely losing your mindHe's not the ONLY one (he does get away with it the most - which I personally don't have an issue with, in general, if the defender is allowed to defend him with the same amount of contact), and that's beside the point - are you of the belief he should be allowed to clear out his defender with his off-arm, but the defender should be called for a foul for less defensive contact?