It's not unrealistic it's just accepted it as the new normal. Look at it this way, 10-20 years do you really want it to be normal for the left party to be beating war drums and favoring Wall Street while half the population is considered poor? I think someone like Obama was as left wing as you can be in this current climate but no liberal can sit and tell me that if Bush or McCain was running the same drone war and left Wall Street of the hook like he did that they wouldn't be calling for their head on a pike.Social issues have been enough and will always be enough for me. Look at the political landscape around the world, even Europe has really regressive social policies in places. My parties right wing policies? You're welcome to give examples. You have to remember the country at large is full of puritanical nut jobs. I understand where you are coming from but it's largely unrealistic.
blame it on common core*you're
Oh yeahwhat happens when the socialist prophets endorse the establishment tho i know where you stand now
the thread is a poorly made troll attempt with sprinkles of bitterness that most likely will fester for the next 4 years, honestly its lucky to get the responses it has thus far
Liberals, how does it feel to be the midwives of fascism?
Not only did/does Shilary support that war criminal, the bytch is on record supporting covert military intervention...
Great Bourdain quote on Kissinger
Vote for a warmongering proud Goldwater whore because the media paints her to be the "lesser evil" brehs...Addressing a Goldman Sachs event in 2013, in one of the speeches that WikiLeaks published on Saturday, Mrs. Clinton gave a tough-minded, realpolitik answer to the question of how to handle a problem like Syria. If the best chance of success was to act secretly inside that country, she made clear, she had no problem doing that.
She went on to say — as her audience already knew because of revelations in the news media — that as secretary of state she had advocated secretly arming the Syrian opposition and moving forcefully to counter the Russians, who at that point were supporting President Bashar al-Assad but had not yet fully entered the conflict.
“My view was you intervene as covertly as is possible for Americans to intervene,” she said in answer to a question from Lloyd C. Blankfein, the chief executive of Goldman Sachs, which paid Mrs. Clinton about $225,000 a speech to give what felt like an insider’s view of the making of American foreign policy, months after she left office.
But she quickly acknowledged that “we used to be much better at this than we are now.”
“Now, you know, everybody can’t help themselves,” she added, and officials go out to “tell their friendly reporters and somebody else: ‘Look what we’re doing, and I want credit for it.’
Not only did/does Shilary support that war criminal, the bytch is on record supporting covert military intervention...
Vote for a warmongering proud Goldwater whore because the media paints her to be the "lesser evil" brehs...
"ROMNEY WAS RELATIVELY BENIGN"
And we have no idea how she’ll governi just realized Kamala is running a 90s GOP campaign, which is where the Democratic Party is right now. Even down to neocon moves.
I admit I was feeling the vibes of the campaign the past few weeks.Kamala a way better candidate than Hillary. But God damn