Doing things that are against my interest is not necessarily the same as governing center to left.
Reading the leaked Clinton emails (the ones that show Clinton speaking) don't really reveal someone adament about screwing people over or doing shady things. It seems like someone fairly pragmatic in her approach and willing to consider reasonable solutions.
The far-left like you feel pragamtism is a form of selling out and think radical shifts in political paradigms mean "improvement". So far I disagree.
I'm not sure about the approach of the populist yet. I don't think you guys have the right temperament to address the problems in a effective way. I've seen what became of the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street and its sickening.
So until the Democratic Party becomes modern day Republican Party they will be my home til further notice.
All your talking points are tired and regurgitated
You're equating pragmatism with maintaining the status quo, and view any shift in political paradigms as a "radical" shift, so by definition you want to maintain neo-liberal policies.
The definition of a Populist :
1. a member or adherent of a political party seeking to represent the interests of ordinary people.
Now why are you using the word populist as a negative? It's because you aren't speaking from the perspective of the working class but from the perspective of the bourgeois, and that's precisely the problem many people have with the democratic party, a party that often claims to "represent" the working class but will steadily pursue policies in the interest of the upper class.
They are both the same schizophrenic douchebag...and he probably has other aliases
Black Mirror should do an episode on aliases emulating aliases.
