You’re excusing stuff. They know better.
Would you say the same if a 17 year old was fukking a 12 year old?
You’re letting these girls off the hook because of “hormones” as if the 20 year olds fukking these girls also don’t have hormones.
I remember I would go to church retreats and everybody sneaking around and fukking.
Hormones ain’t a good excuse for shyt.
I agree,but I think its a mixed bag. She said parents need to teach the girls because if not
"it’s obvious that a girl is going to fall for someone who has more game/experience."
But while many young girls are naive and taken advantage of by older men being manipulative,Alot of young girls back in my day were the ones with the game and the experience. Some of them bragged about how they had the older dude tricking,and having his apartment key. People always assume the older man is on some smooth Fabio shyt. But some of them older dudes was only getting used for their resources. And we know some werent told the real age going in. Those girls saw them as easy marks.
Now of course you can call the girl a victim for maybe seeing and hearing too much at a young age. Maybe having too much experience for whatever reason(casual teen sex,or molestation).
Just like if a juvenile commits a crime. We should take into considerstion their age,and judge them accordingly or not at all. But doesnt change the fact you killed and knew exactly what you were doing.
So i see certain underage girls as victims when they were manipulated or maybe felt pressured by an authority figure. But we need a word other than "victim" for those girls who knew exactly what they were doing,wanted an older guy,and in some cases were using and victimizing the older men.
Its like putting women who were raped and women who were "coerced" in the same category. No,that man said you had to call an Uber to take you home if you didnt wanna smash,so you obliged. That is not in the same atmosphere as a an actual victim being forcibly raped.