Says the guy who doesn't even know what he's talking aboutLike I said do better bozo
Says the guy who doesn't even know what he's talking aboutLike I said do better bozo
I'm sure he did which is why I said he was a patriot.That fakkit sold information to Putin though
Has Biden or Trump been accused of the unauthorized release of these documents?Where's the lie? Reality winner got 5 years. What the elite get? At most probation? Despite being in the highest positions in the country
Has Biden or Trump been accused of the unauthorized release of these documents?
Troll on
You. Cannot. Retain. Classified. Information. In. Unauthorized. Areas. Or. Share. It. With. Unauthorized. Individuals.But @Payday23 said I don’t know what I’m talking about…. Dude posting disingenuous tweets from clownden the traitor
Has Biden or Trump been accused of the unauthorized release of these documents?
Troll on
Professionally speaking, you don't know what you're talking about.Yes the fbi and press who've reported the documents that have classified information markings found at these locations don't know what those markings mean
This is a grade a spin job. This is just as bad as the clowns saying Trump could declassify just by saying it. The problem is they have the markings and they were found where they shouldn't have been. Textbook mishandling classified information. You don't have to release them to mishandle classified information or unauthorized retention. You're arguing semantics.
Professionally speaking IDGAF what you think. I guess Reuters is wrong?Professionally speaking, you don't know what you're talking about.
This sums it up:
i dont even want garland to pursue trump on this anymore biden fukked it up. the double standard is too glaring. yeah, trump obstructed, but whatever. its overThrow out trumps case? Trump didn’t have a TS clearance so no his case ain’t getting thrown out.. y’all dudes are hilarious
You obviously don't give a fukk. That's why you've been called disingenuous repeatededly.Professionally speaking IDGAF what you think. I guess Reuters is wrong?
You don't actually know the laws here or the difference in classification.It is unlawful to knowingly or willfully remove or retain classified material. Failure to properly store and secure classified material poses risks to national security if it should fall into the wrong hands.
(I've said this the entire time)
What the point of posting an article if it doesn't support your argument?You can't charge Trump even with the obstruction without charging Biden. This is dead. They both mishandled classified information and you should find a different job if you don't know how to comprehend what both are guilty of.
Blue Maga vs Red Maga strikes again
It is a crime only if the retention and removal of classified records is intentional.
Prosecutors typically won't pursue charges for the accidental retention of classified records, but if there is evidence of possible obstruction of justice, that could change things.
Also, as president, Biden is unlikely to face prosecution. The Justice Department has not changed its long-standing policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted.
The same policy helped insulate Trump when he was president and under investigation by then-Special Counsel Robert Mueller. In that case, Mueller declined to determine whether Trump had obstructed his investigation into possible ties between Russia and Trump's 2016 election campaign because of the department's policy.
Biden was a private citizen in possession of classified information just like Trump. I do know the difference and it's been shown that they've been classified and top secret. You can point to oops it was at my former office, but the garage and house? The only difference is trump refused to return them and obstructed. For political reasons he won't be indicted. Garland is not going to rock the boat. Sitting on the news before the elections was a terrible look too. I don't know how many times you guys have to see it to believe it. Please continue with the snarkiness. This is why democrats are painted as out of touch elites. The hopium highs you guys are on is surely a sight to seeYou obviously don't give a fukk. That's why you've been called disingenuous repeatededly.
You don't actually know the laws here or the difference in classification.
You're somehow treating everything like it's SCI when classification is fairly broad and consistently cha going since outside of nuclear documents it's really as the discretion of the executive branch.
What the point of posting an article if it doesn't support your argument?