KillSpray
Don't be mad
A good approach I've heard is to look at learning music like learning a language.
If you think about how a child naturally picks up language, they basically observe more experienced speakers, and pretty much right away surrounded by it and attempt to engage with the goo goo ga ga. It's fully immersive. So to stretch it to music, this is the period of listening to the music you're a fan of, engaging with others who are more experienced than you (if you play an instrument, it might be jamming with more experienced musicians, if you're into making music is a DAW it's a little more tricky, but you can find someone who's more experienced and try to engage), and you have to start writing immediately, your musical goo goo ga ga stage.
After a while you gain basic functionality, you can communicate basic ideas, etc... even though you may not be grammatically correct, or able to really pronounce things properly. Then slowly, you are introduced to the rules of grammar. But that's only after you've already gained a basic level of conversational proficiency.
So music theory would be introduced slowly after you'd written a lot of "goo goo ga ga" material, and even a lot of semi coherent material. And the thing I like about the comparison is, you rarely find an interesting speaker or writer who observes grammar completely strictly. That's where people develop slang, or purposely slur, or play with their tone to communicate. Same thing starts to happen in music. But there's no short cuts, when you get into music, you looking at years before you can really claim even a basic understanding. There's always exceptions, child prodigy's, shyt like that, but for most people, it's a marathon. For people who trip on something interesting or new very early, they may get accelerated in terms of the attention they receive, but there's no replacement for the years of practice that separates someone who is completely at each and conversational vs. someone who doesn't have a full grasp of their material.
If you think about how a child naturally picks up language, they basically observe more experienced speakers, and pretty much right away surrounded by it and attempt to engage with the goo goo ga ga. It's fully immersive. So to stretch it to music, this is the period of listening to the music you're a fan of, engaging with others who are more experienced than you (if you play an instrument, it might be jamming with more experienced musicians, if you're into making music is a DAW it's a little more tricky, but you can find someone who's more experienced and try to engage), and you have to start writing immediately, your musical goo goo ga ga stage.
After a while you gain basic functionality, you can communicate basic ideas, etc... even though you may not be grammatically correct, or able to really pronounce things properly. Then slowly, you are introduced to the rules of grammar. But that's only after you've already gained a basic level of conversational proficiency.
So music theory would be introduced slowly after you'd written a lot of "goo goo ga ga" material, and even a lot of semi coherent material. And the thing I like about the comparison is, you rarely find an interesting speaker or writer who observes grammar completely strictly. That's where people develop slang, or purposely slur, or play with their tone to communicate. Same thing starts to happen in music. But there's no short cuts, when you get into music, you looking at years before you can really claim even a basic understanding. There's always exceptions, child prodigy's, shyt like that, but for most people, it's a marathon. For people who trip on something interesting or new very early, they may get accelerated in terms of the attention they receive, but there's no replacement for the years of practice that separates someone who is completely at each and conversational vs. someone who doesn't have a full grasp of their material.