What's An Acceptable Number Of Sexual Parters For A 21-Year Old Girl To Have?

[Liquid]

How do you know the REAL number isn't over 90 tho?

 

[DaChampIsHere]

Would you want to marry a person that's prone to good decision making, and responsibility? Or would you want a person who will follow their animalistic instincts into bad decisions?

You all think everyone views sex the same way you do when they don't.

 

[jalamanta]

it's not like women are voluntarily saying "his dikk is bigger than yours" "he beat it better." these are interview answers because someone chose to ask those questions

It's seems like you got his point but pretended like you did not, like a typical bytch would do.

Why don't you post a pic of your face since you are so opinionated and female at the same time. I bet you will get less responses after that.

Haven't seen an attractive woman with 2k posts at a message board before.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

You all think everyone views sex the same way you do when they don't.

It's not about viewing it one way or another. It is what it is. Sex is for procreation, nature has made it feel good to us to make sure we do it. We as humans have decided that we would still like to indulge in the good feelings of having sex, without making babies. We as humans also understand the risk/reward of having sex.

A good feeling is never worth the risk of disease or unwanted pregnancy so we all try to reduce this risk. Some do a better job at this than others. The amount of sexual partners a person has is a direct reflection of their responsibility as a human being. I'm not saying a person should have no sex or be against sexual activity. But if a person is having sex with 4-5 people a year, there is no way that they where making good, safe decisions for all of them.

 

[DaChampIsHere]

It's not about viewing it one way or another. It is what it is. Sex is for procreation, nature has made it feel good to us to make sure we do it. We as humans have decided that we would still like to indulge in the good feelings of having sex, without making babies. We as humans also understand the risk/reward of having sex.

A good feeling is never worth the risk of disease or unwanted pregnancy so we all try to reduce this risk. Some do a better job at this than others. The amount of sexual partners a person has is a direct reflection of their responsibility as a human being. I'm not saying a person should have no sex or be against sexual activity. But if a person is having sex with 4-5 people a year, there is no way that they where making good, safe decisions for all of them.

Your first paragraph is irrelevant if you have sex for any reason outside of making a baby, so scratch that.

If you are using protective methods I don't see how the second paragraph is relevant either. Maybe you couldn't make safe decisions with 4-5 people, but other people can, so I don't think your ability should be a measurement for everyone else to abide by.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Your first paragraph is irrelevant if you have sex for any reason outside of making a baby, so scratch that

It is relevant because making a baby is the biggest reward of having sex. If you purposely remove the biggest reward(baby) then all you're left with is a lot of risk.

If you are using protective methods I don't see how the second paragraph is relevant either. Maybe you couldn't make safe decisions with 4-5 people, but other people can, so I don't think your ability should be a measurement for everyone else to abide by.

No protective measure is 100% reliable. Condoms burst and you can still catch herpies on your balls. Part of the "safe decisinon" of having sex is knowing the person you're having sex with. There is no way your gonna meet 5 people a year and learn enough about them to have responsible sex with them. Plus anybody who claims to use protective measures EVERYTIME is a damn lie. People in relationships are more likely to use protection than those out just fukking.

When choosing a partner, would you rather trust the fact that they used protection for all 50 of their prior mates, or would you chose the person that you know DIDN'T have irresponsible sex with 50 different people?

 

[DaChampIsHere]

It is relevant because making a baby is the biggest reward of having sex. If you purposely remove the biggest reward(baby) then all you're left with is a lot of risk.



No protective measure is 100% reliable. Condoms burst and you can still catch herpies on your balls. Part of the "safe decisinon" of having sex is knowing the person you're having sex with. There is no way your gonna meet 5 people a year and learn enough about them to have responsible sex with them. Plus anybody who claims to use protective measures EVERYTIME is a damn lie. People in relationships are more likely to use protection than those out just fukking.

When choosing a partner, would you rather trust the fact that they used protection for all 50 of their prior mates, or would you chose the person that you know DIDN'T have irresponsible sex with 50 different people?

It's not relevant when you are using such standard to judge someone and even you don't abde by such.

You can catch herpes by kissing someone. Is it now all of a sudden bad to start kissing people? You gonna stop doing that? Chances of a condom busting are slim to none if you are using them correctly, not to mention also being able to pull out AND birth control in addition to using condoms. I been fukkin' damn near 12 years and never had a slip up. Again, I'm not dating someone with diseases, but I'm also not gonna play private investigator and look for a time when they had raw sex as a means to get rid of them if they are disease free.

p*ssy isn't the biggest thing on my mind when choosing a partner. All I want is a good partner. I'm not asking how many people. Both of those people are the same to me in that they both exercised caution and responsibility, just in different ways.

 

[HelgaPataki]

Why don't you post a pic of your face since you are so opinionated

i could see if this was a thread where we were discussing looks, but that shyt is just so random for this thread

 

[MeachTheMonster]

It's not relevant when you are using such standard to judge someone and even you don't abde by such.

I can embrace my irresponsibilities, just as I can point out others. I'm just pointing out reality. If a person said I was irresponsible because I was having promiscuous sex, they would be correct.

You can catch herpes by kissing someone. Is it now all of a sudden bad to start kissing people? You gonna stop doing that? Chances of a condom busting are slim to none if you are using them correctly, not to mention also being able to pull out AND birth control in addition to using condoms. I been fukkin' damn near 12 years and never had a slip up. Again, I'm not dating someone with diseases, but I'm also not gonna play private investigator and look for a time when they had raw sex as a means to get rid of them if they are disease free.

No but I'm going to minimize my risk by kissing less people, and knowing who it is I am kissing. Doesn't matter if the chances are slim, the point is there is still a chance, and the more sexual partners you have the more you increase that chance. Pull out method is not very reliable(I have a daughter to prove this) and there is no way you're gonna know for sure a woman is taking her birth control correctly, especially if your having sex with multiple women, you won't have time to make sure each one is on birth control.

I agree that you shouldn't play private investigator, and multiple partners is not a dealbreaker. But the number of sexual partners a person has is a good indicator of a persons character and responsibility.

p*ssy isn't the biggest thing on my mind when choosing a partner. All I want is a good partner. I'm not asking how many people. Both of those people are the same to me in that they both exercised caution and responsibility, just in different ways.

A good partner is usually a person that is good at commitment and responsible life decisions, a person with a bunch of sexual partners is usually a person who is not good with commitment and is prone to making bad decisions. There are plenty of exceptions, and that's where your judge of character comes in. But again people who are out having promiscuous sex are more likely to be having irresponsible sex than people who are in relationships.

 

[DaChampIsHere]

I can embrace my irresponsibilities, just as I can point out others. I'm just pointing out reality. If a person said I was irresponsible because I was having promiscuous sex, they would be correct.


No but I'm going to minimize my risk by kissing less people, and knowing who it is I am kissing. Doesn't matter if the chances are slim, the point is there is still a chance, and the more sexual partners you have the more you increase that chance. Pull out method is not very reliable(I have a daughter to prove this) and there is no way you're gonna know for sure a woman is taking her birth control correctly, especially if your having sex with multiple women, you won't have time to make sure each one is on birth control.

I agree that you shouldn't play private investigator, and multiple partners is not a dealbreaker. But the number of sexual partners a person has is a good indicator of a persons character and responsibility.


A good partner is usually a person that is good at commitment and responsible life decisions, a person with a bunch of sexual partners is usually a person who is not good with commitment and is prone to making bad decisions. There are plenty of exceptions, and that's where your judge of character comes in. But again people who are out having promiscuous sex are more likely to be having irresponsible sex than people who are in relationships.

So your basically in the same shyt you're judging other people for being in and not changing anything about such? Like I said, the judgment is irrelevant then.

You can get herpes from kissing one person who drank after someone else. You can't monitor where everyone is putting there lips at, so if you really believed what you were saying, you'd be slow to put your lips on ANYONE and anything. If a woman doesn't take her birth control, she's the dumb ass. If the dude doesn't know how to use a condom properly and in addition he can't control himself enough to pull out, how is sex the bad thing? No use in demonizing an activity when it's the people who are stupid. That's your fukk up. Everyone else can't live their life on the mistakes and stupidity of others. That's like me telling you not to drive your car because I got in an accident.

Again, it's not a good indicator. Are divorce rates high for people who have more partners, yes. But you all have to consider the climate in which those stats have come about (ie. recession, a climate where women, maybe whom are married, are starting to feel more free sexually and don't feel the need to hide it). Y'all like to post up stats, but the divorce rate is decreasing in spite of women having more sex partners and being more open about such in our time. What does that tell you? People no longer feel the need to hide themselves, and that is doing society a lot better than socially castrating and demonizing women for having sex.

Also, the main thing you all tout up about marriage is being able to fukk raw, so now we are going to act like that isn't true? Married people have the most irresponsible sex.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

So your basically in the same shyt you're judging other people for being in and not changing anything about such? Like I said, the judgment is irrelevant then.

I have changed myself(I'm happily married, and totally fateful) and I advocate marriage and family building. I won't deny my past, but that doesn't mean i can't point out people making the same mistakes i made.

You can get herpes from kissing one person who drank after someone else. You can't monitor where everyone is putting there lips at, so if you really believed what you were saying, you'd be slow to put your lips on ANYONE and anything.

You are correct, but the fact still stands, kissing more people increases your risk, and the more people your kissing the less likely you are to know the truth about their kissing habits. The risk can't be eliminated but it can be reduced. If a person is not concerned with reducing their risk then they are probably not a very responsible person.

If a woman doesn't take her birth control, she's the dumb ass. If the dude doesn't know how to use a condom properly and in addition he can't control himself enough to pull out, how is sex the bad thing? No use in demonizing an activity when it's the people who are stupid. That's your fukk up. Everyone else can't live their life on the mistakes and stupidity of others. That's like me telling you not to drive your car because I got in an accident.

Fact is most people are dumb asses, and lack self control. I'm not demonizing sex, I'm saying since we all know that "the people are stupid" we should be more careful how we interact with each other. I would say that a person should drive responsibly and not take unnecessary risks. Find a good safe car and take good care of it.

Again, it's not a good indicator. Are divorce rates high for people who have more partners, yes. But you all have to consider the climate in which those stats have come about (ie. recession, a climate where women, maybe whom are married, are starting to feel more free sexually and don't feel the need to hide it). Y'all like to post up stats, but the divorce rate is decreasing in spite of women having more sex partners and being more open about such in our time. What does that tell you? People no longer feel the need to hide themselves, and that is doing society a lot better than socially castrating and demonizing women for having sex.

I'm not castrating or demonizing women for anything. If you read my posts the only time i even mentioned women was when talking about birth control. My message goes for men just as much as it goes for women.

Also, the main thing you all tout up about marriage is being able to fukk raw, so now we are going to act like that isn't true? Married people have the most irresponsible sex.

Married or dedicated exclusive sex is the most responsible sex a person could have. Being in an exclusive relationship is the best way to reduce the risks of having sex. If you are not dividing your time up between multiple partners you have more time to make sure the one you do have is taking care of their body and being exclusive with you. Also pregnancy becomes less of a risk because you actually could bear having a child with that person and you may even want the child, which would turn it into a benefit.

 

[Aufheben]

these bytches is filthy

 

[Ohene]

26 in 3 years while ALWAYS single those numbers are low. the figure is 72.

every guy a girl meets and sleeps with you think she WANTS to stay in her life? a guy might just be a loser with good sex skills. she don't want him for life just tonight. so he can disappear after she gets hers.

as far as my number it will remain private because it has nothing to do with anyone but me. i suggest other women take the same route.

so you know this nikka sex skills are great without having sex with him?

you sleep with him and find out it indeed is really great?

and then you ditch him to find a better sexual partner?

Definition of a hoe. Why the fukk would you want to marry a girl with such an attitude. For even if you supply her with good dikk, she will always wonder if theres better dikk because thats what shes accustomed to doing. Youre proving these nikkas' points.

How are you different from a heroin addict who continues to chase that first high because it was so great? Going from dealer to dealer, needle to needle. I enjoy the trolling though, continue

 

[Ohene]

why ar enikkas taking Helga seriously

 

[HelgaPataki]

so you know this nikka sex skills are great without having sex with him?

girls gossip i already said i'm not marrying anyone.

and at scolding me when the amount of married and guys in relationships here admit to cheating. go scold them. tell them they are hoes and not marriage material.

why ar enikkas taking Helga seriously

one guy quoted my observation wrong and it snowballed.