Saying weak yet they’ve won back to back. Bush this dumb ass threadas much as it hurts my heart to say, it's probably the Chiefs current dynasty they are the least dominant-looking "dynasty" that i've seen in sports
Even tho they never won, what does going to four straight do for the Bills then?but they went to 4 in a row what does that make it ?
I think it's because their offense looked cooked during the regular seasonas much as it hurts my heart to say, it's probably the Chiefs current dynasty they are the least dominant-looking "dynasty" that i've seen in sports
Even tho they never won, what does going to four straight do for the Bills then?
but they went to 4 in a row what does that make it ?
They looked the most beatable out of any legit dynasty imoSo let me get this straight
In the Era of parity, the Chiefs are not a dominant dynasty, even though:
1) Won 3 out of 5 last SBs
2) Appeared in 4 out of the last 5 SBs
3) 6 straight AFC title game appearances
Thecoli.com
8 straight with two different teams. Dam that's crazy to even say out loudLeBron having multiple final appearances is a testament to his greatness, a team does it and it's used as an argument they weren't that great.
Honestly first thing I thought of.
Dynasty of failure
DeleteHonestly first thing I thought of.
Got blown out by Dirk.
Won the next two.
Kawhi ended them.
4 NBA Finals appearances but two lopsided losses isn't really much of a dynasty.
Chiefs 4 Super Bowl appearances and won 3 of them, now that's a Dynasty.
#5 looks like it's loading. Labeling them "a weak dynasty" is funny