How you going to start the thread and have the worst take in the first post?as much as it hurts my heart to say, it's probably the Chiefs current dynasty they are the least dominant-looking "dynasty" that i've seen in sports
as much as it hurts my heart to say, it's probably the Chiefs current dynasty they are the least dominant-looking "dynasty" that i've seen in sports
aight imma let myself outHow you going to start the thread and have the worst take in the first post?
Most definitely the 2011-2014 Heatles....Im not sure id even call it a dynasty cuz in retrospect it was only a b2b.
But it got blown up so quickly after 2014s ass kicking by the Spurs...
So let me get this straightas much as it hurts my heart to say, it's probably the Chiefs current dynasty they are the least dominant-looking "dynasty" that i've seen in sports
*looks at username*
Dynasty of failure
Riddanceaight imma let myself out
They’re not. 2 titles does not make you a dynasty.