What the Ancient World thought of black people....

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,722
Daps
203,941
Reppin
the ether
Damn breh just shared a video and got flamed :mjlol:


But what’s the backstory on op? I see a few posts questioning him


He posts a bunch of pedo stuff, including lusting after an 11yo girl and saying he'll be all over that when she's 14.

He posts a lot of rape fantasies, some of which sound disturbingly real.

He openly lusts after white women to a clownish degree.

His only friend and defender is @Sccit
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,602
Reputation
-17,841
Daps
84,266
Reppin
NULL
the romans considered everyone apart from themselves and some Greeks barbaric whether you are black or white. you will laugh if you see what Julius Caesar said about Britons. creh was so disgusted, he fled across the channel during a storm. :russ::russ:

The British were living like animals before the Romans came through. Absolute shyt show. The Greeks were so disgusted by the whites who lived to the north of them that they didn't even consider themselves the same race as the Germanic tribes. To the Greeks they were their own race separate from the Africans to their south who they had great respect for and the blonde hair blue eyed barbarians to their north who they had nothing but contempt for.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,438
Reputation
-19,899
Daps
75,498
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
He posts a bunch of pedo stuff, including lusting after an 11yo girl and saying he'll be all over that when she's 14.

He posts a lot of rape fantasies, some of which sound disturbingly real.

He openly lusts after white women to a clownish degree.

His only friend and defender is @Sccit


THIS POST SAYS MORE ABOUT U THAN ANYTHING


TALKING ABOUT MAKING FRIENDS ON THE INTERNET


LOL
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,722
Daps
203,941
Reppin
the ether
THIS POST SAYS MORE ABOUT U THAN ANYTHING


TALKING ABOUT MAKING FRIENDS ON THE INTERNET


LOL


So you're gonna claim Swagnificent isn't your friend, yet you constantly go to bat for a pedophile, downplaying his remarks and begging for him to be let off bannings?

You even tried to cape for him IN the pedo thread, in the same thread where you said other posters who did the same shyt should be banned, you kept arguing for Swag to be freed and downplaying what he said:


@Swagnificent WAS BANNED BUT @GoddamnyamanProf STILL ACTIVE?

:jbhmm:
IF I THOUGHT SWAG WAS AN ACTUAL PEDO, I WOULD WANT HIM BANNED

I DONT. PERIOD.
@Swagnificent THIS IS THE SAME GUY WHO HAS THE NERVE TO CALL U A PEDO CUZ U MADE A FACETIOUS REMARK .. LOOK @ HIM BEIN DEAD SERIOUS. ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING.
THIS IS 100X WORSE THAN ANYTHING SWAG HAS EVER SAID .
AGAIN, HE BASICALLY SAID SHE LOOKS LIKE SHE’LL BE FINE WHEN SHE’S OLDER... WHILE ITS TASTELESS, ITS FAR DIFFERENT THAN “I CANT HELP MYSELF WIT THEM BIG TITTIES SHE’S HIDING!!”
EVERYTHING U JUST POSTED, I'VE SAID MYSELF IN THIS VERY THREAD.....

ONCE AGAIN, I'M NOT DEFENDING SWAG'S COMMENTS....I THINK THEY WERE TASTELESS AND I KNOW FOR A FACT HE WAS TROLLIN' BY MAKIN DUMB JOKES, KIND OF HOW HOWARD STERN USED TO DO WIT THE OLSEN TWINS "CANT WAIT TIL THEY TURN 18" TYPE SHIIT..........
PAY ATTENTION .... I DO NOT CONDONE WHAT SWAG SAID, BUT IF U LOOK, U WILL SEE THAT HE STATED IN THE VERY POST U QUOTED THAT HE WOULD NEVER CONSIDER GOIN FOR ANYTHING UNDER 18. THATS THE OPPOSITE OF A PEDO. HE ALSO SAID HE IS ONLY SEXUALLY ATTRACTED TO WOMEN WHO LOOK OF AGE. IF HE FINDS OUT THAT FEMALE ISN’T 18, HE WOULDNT EVEN CONSIDER IT....AT BEST, U COULD SAY HE’S TOEIN THE LINE.... BUT ITS STILL NOT NEARLY AS BAD
ONCE AGAIN, ALTHOUGH SWAG’S REMARKS WERE TASTELESS, HE CLEARLY TALKED ABOUT “STASHIN EM AWAY TIL THEY TURN 18” WHILE MAKIN AN OBVIOUS JOKE ABOUT A SPURS DRAFT PICK. IM NOT SAYIN THATS A COOL REMARK TO MAKE, BUT ITS A LIL DIFFERENT
AGAIN U CAPIN ASS WEIRDO

CALLING SOMETHING TASTELESS IS NOT EXCUSING IT

FUCC OFF MY NUTS
IM NOT DEFENDING IT, I SAID I THINK IT WAS TASTELESS

BUT I DONT THINK HE’S AN ACTUAL PEDO LIKE @GoddamnyamanProf OBVIOUSLY IS
IF I WAS CAPIN I WOULDNT CALL IT TASTELESS
@Swagnificent's posts were not facetious.

swagnpdkuc3m.png
LOOKS LIKE HE’S JOKIN TO ME .. IVE NEVER SEEN HIM GO AS FAR AS SAYIN “DAMN I CANT HELP MYSELF, THEM BIG TITTIES!!”

THERE WAS TOO MUCH GRAPHIC DETAIL IN WHAT @GoddamnyamanProf SAID FOR IT TO BE SHOCK VALUE BULLSHIIT ALA WHAT I FELT @Swagnificent WAS ON
SWAG WAS OBVIOUSLY MAKIN A JOKE.. WAS IT IN BAD TASTE? SURE
HE ALREADY SAID HE WAS TROLLIN



And in other theads too:



GLAD UR BAN WAS TEMPORARY BRODIE.... @Swagnificent COMIN BACK TOO OR NAAH?
WELCOME BACK
GOOD TO HAVE U BACK FAM

full
DOUBT HE’S A PEDO, CATS JUS MAD CUZ HE EXPOSES LEBRON
“IF THERES GRASS ON THE FIELD PLAY BALL” MIGHT BE THE OLDEST TROLL JOKE IN THE EXISTENCE OF MANKIND
SWAG IS GOOD PEOPLES
IF I THOUGHT SWAG WAS AN ACTUAL PEDO, I WOULD WANT HIM BANNED

I DONT. PERIOD.
WELCOME BACK FAM
WELCOME BACK
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,722
Daps
203,941
Reppin
the ether
Now, what was all that shyt that @Sccit was caping for? Here are the @Swagnificent remarks that @Sccit defended:



This is all in reference to an 11 year old actress:

why they had to kill this cutie? :sadcam: if they let her grow, she coulda been the baddest bytch next to sasha.


8a6740f47fb42951ca33f3fab5c20256.jpg

to me she's like a Spurs first round pick. draft her now. but stash her away for like 3 years. then after she matures, she'll be ready to contribute.

baby girl gon be bad as fukk :banderas: :noah: :patrice:


you know Lizzie gon be bad as fukk in a few years

hopefully they grooming her for Carl to bust up in

Season 4 Maggie: "kinda disgusting"

11 year old girl: "She's gonna be a problem when she's 14!"

:huhldup:

You might want to read up on something called puberty. During a short period of time, humans can experience tremendous changes in their bodies. Its during this short timespan that boys become men and girls become women. So yes, 3 years can make a huge difference.

if there's grass on the field :yeshrug:



"baddest bytch"
"bad as fukk"
"carl to bust up in"
"grass on the field"


How was that not worth a permaban? :why:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,722
Daps
203,941
Reppin
the ether
Was that the only time? Of course not. Here was a thread where Swagnificent was full-on defending R. Kelly and said there was no problem with a grown man impregnating a 15 or 16 year old or even "some" 14 year old and even younger girls. He said that what R. Kelly did was natural because 24yo women are already ran through:


Its not creepy to be plotting on a girl with a big ass and big t*ts even if she's just 16 years old.

As black men, we are not attracted to prepubescent girls. That is some white boy shyt. The young girls we are attracted to typically have bodies that look like grown women. Diddy, Jay-Z, and R. Kelly may have messed with girls that were technically underage but they were fully developed sexually. They had womanly bodies and just happened to be young. And there's nothing wrong about it.

I would say 99% of 17 year olds are sexually mature. And when I'm talking about young girls are sexually mature, I'm talking about those who already have womanly bodies that we can all clearly see. I was not talking about EVERY 15 or 16 year old. I was only talking about a select group.

You misunderstood me. It just so happened the sophomore class had the finest girls in school. I wasn't trying to suggest they were the finest because they were younger. My point was that 18 isn't some magical number and girls suddenly become women then. I was only pointing out that 15-16 year old girls could also be fully developed when it comes to the sort if features that make a woman sexually attractive to a guy.

In some cases there isn't. Now I know where this is going cause you're just gonna keep going down. There are a lot of girls who mature at 15. Even more at 16. And then way more at 17. Now obviously if we go backwards, you see the same trend just in the opposite direction. So at 14 there are barely any girls who are sexually mature. And as you go lower the percentages get lower and lower.

All I know is that in most cases there isn't a difference between girls at 16 vs 18. When I was in high school, the finest girls my senior year were not seniors or even juniors. It was the sophomore class. They had a number of really fine girls who were just as sexually developed as the senior girls. So guess what group all the senior guys were going for? The sophomore girls. I'm guessing most were around 15 or 16.

People gotta stop acting like 18 is some magical number. Its a totally arbitrary line that was made by society.

You still didn't answer my question. When she turns 15 or 16 you're fukking her correct?

Only if she's developed her womanly body AND I live in a state where the age of consent is 16.

I'm not an advocate for breaking the law. And I'm only attracted to women with fully developed bodies.

Pedophila is a problem with dudes that go for girls that look underage. Girls with no breast or ass development. That look like children. That is when it becomes a problem. Its not creepy to be plotting on a girl with a big ass and big t*ts even if she's just 16 years old.

Nothing weird about what I said. All I said is the young girl would grow up to be attractive. I am not attracted sexually to prepubescent girls. However, I can tell which ones are gonna grow up to be cute and which ones won't like everyone else. I just got the balls to say it cause I know who I am and I ain't scared to what others will think. The rest of ya'll are just shook by the rules of society and are so afraid of what others will say or think that you'll deny what we all can see.

I'm sexually attracted to women with wide hips, big asses, and big t*ts. Cyn Santana being the archetype of the type of female I'm most attracted to sexually. Now I do realize that there are some 16 year old girls who have those features that I find attractive. So I'm not gonna act like that 16 year old girl with the big ass and t*ts ain't sexually attractive to me just cause society said you can't be attracted to girls under an arbitrary age.

Once again, maybe its because you're white that you're having a hard time understanding me. I'll only repeat myself one more time. I am attracted to wide hips and a fat ass on a female. That means there are plenty of women who are 22+ who the typical white male might find attractive cause they're into those females with cardboard hips, large fake t*ts, and a pancake ass that I would never be attracted to.

Thus if a young female has those attributes (i.e. wide hips and a fat ass) then I'm gonna be attracted to her regardless of age. Now if you wanna say these are the type of women who I'm only gonna wait until they are legal because I'm afraid of the law, then I would agree with you. However, I don't think there is anything wrong about that. I'm simply attracted to a girl who has developed physically faster than most of her peers.

I said the young girl would GROW UP TO BE ATTRACTIVE. I never said I wanted that little girl at her present age with no development of her body. That's why I joked about stashing her overseas for a few years like a Spurs first round draft pick waiting for her to mature into a dime piece.

You can tell by the face which young girls are gonna be attractive when they grow up and which won't. That's all I pointed out. That she would grow up to be an attractive woman. But she was still a girl and didn't have a woman's body yet, hence I was not attracted to her at that age cause I like my women to have sexually mature bodies.

This is a non-story.

16 is no different than 18 biologically. People just created lines where they don't exist in nature.

At 24 alot of women have been run through. The reason guys go for younger girls is the fact they're less likely to be run through.

You gotta realize women are a depreciating commodity. Sorta like cars (as R. Kelly astutely pointed). Once you drive them off the lot, they lose value immediately. The younger the women, the less likely she got lots of wear and tear on her.


But but but he was only joking! It was all in jest! Free Swagnificent! Welcome back brodie! Good to have you back fam!
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,438
Reputation
-19,899
Daps
75,498
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
So you're gonna claim Swagnificent isn't your friend, yet you constantly go to bat for a pedophile, downplaying his remarks and begging for him to be let off bannings?

You even tried to cape for him IN the pedo thread, in the same thread where you said other posters who did the same shyt should be banned, you kept arguing for Swag to be freed and downplaying what he said:




















And in other theads too:



U NEED A LIFE BRO
 

jj23

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2016
Messages
24,929
Reputation
5,876
Daps
114,487
Now, what was all that shyt that @Sccit was caping for? Here are the @Swagnificent remarks that @Sccit defended:



This is all in reference to an 11 year old actress:

















"baddest bytch"
"bad as fukk"
"carl to bust up in"
"grass on the field"


How was that not worth a permaban? :why:
fukk perma ban. Dude needs a law enforcement interview. Hope to god he doesn't have kids.
 
Top