What Pakistan Knew About Bin Laden

methodz

Banned
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
901
Reputation
87
Daps
1,211
Reppin
NULL
Ehhh
Bottom line is The Pakistanis and the Emiratis are the main sources and backers of Terrorism yet we're focused on the secular Syrian regime, Iran which has been murking Al Qaeda as much as anyone through Hezbollah and Russia.

Shows how lobbying American politicians keeps the truth at a far away distance.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,654
Reputation
-34,203
Daps
620,707
Reppin
The Deep State
This is a book excerpt from Gall's book in the magazine, the standard NY editorial standards and the two source confirmation does not apply.

I'm also surprised at the lack of mention of Kayani's role in this, as opposed to Pasha - Kayani was the ISI Chief when OBL got to Abbottabad, not Pasha. If OBL was put up there, it would be Kayani who would have known and Gall should have dug into that.
wait...she has a book on this?

This could be Pultizer winning shyt. Whats the title??????
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
89,256
Reputation
3,727
Daps
158,911
Reppin
Brooklyn
Ehhh
Bottom line is The Pakistanis and the Emiratis are the main sources and backers of Terrorism yet we're focused on the secular Syrian regime, Iran which has been murking Al Qaeda as much as anyone through Hezbollah and Russia.

Shows how lobbying American politicians keeps the truth at a far away distance.

Syria is about as secular as Lebanon.

:heh:

Al Qaeda has camps in Iran. Osama's family were even living there.

:umad:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,654
Reputation
-34,203
Daps
620,707
Reppin
The Deep State
Exactly they said dude had bad kidneys and he died in 01 just like Bhutto stated before she was murdered.
I really doubt this.

As much as it'd play into the "OMG THE GOV'T LIES?!11!?" narrative...its also true that bin laden was being harbored by nations that nurture state-terrorism.

Its not THAT hard to imagine.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
89,256
Reputation
3,727
Daps
158,911
Reppin
Brooklyn
Uh...you sure abuot that? I thuoght Lebanon was considered the most secular place in the middle east sans Turkey.

Yes. Read about how their government is set up and divisions within communities. Read about their civil war. See the divide between Sunni and Shiite when it comes to the Syrian Civil War.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
89,256
Reputation
3,727
Daps
158,911
Reppin
Brooklyn
Have you EVER considered that this might be wrong?

Bhutto and Amanpour both suggested U/OBL was in Pakistan back in 07/08.

He's got it all figured out, Bro. He even found Sasquatch.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-160
Daps
65,110
Reppin
NULL
Then I think we can assume that Bhutto was being kept in the dark, at the very least.

Nah, anything dealing with Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran political issues....Bhutto knew it. She was killed because she exposed the death of OBL awhile back and you can't keep a war on terror going if the frontman was killed and someone knew about it.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,654
Reputation
-34,203
Daps
620,707
Reppin
The Deep State
Nah, anything dealing with Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran political issues....Bhutto knew it. She was killed because she exposed the death of OBL awhile back and you can't keep a war on terror going if the frontman was killed and someone knew about it.
See I disagree.

Theres more credibility behind the idea that the:

1. the USA Knew pakistan was harboring OBL
2. Went in and killed UBL
3. Pakistan got MAD at the fact we killed their dude (if you remember)
4. We eventually get info saying that Paki leaders knew where OBL was

than to assert that Bhutto:

1. exposed that OBL was dead and was killed for exposing this.

Bhutto had a lot of reasons to be targeted...exposing the supposed death of a terrorist doesn't make much sense because then you're left filling in:

1. why would the USA simultaneously say they killed someone who pakistan claimed to be harboring when the USA is against what pakistan was doing???

That makes no sense.
 
Top