I know what you're getting at and I truly agree with you but I don't think this falls into the category that you're talking about. If you appreciate how is it wrong? Especially for black people who've been told they're ugly and subhuman for hundreds of years.
Asians and Hispanics have been fukked over by the caste which I've already stated. White's tanning is an aesthetic thing, there is no stereotyping or in-group out-group BS driving it. I don't see any reason to acknowledge that shade other than for appearance purposes, all that "this shade is Black" "this color is feminine" "this color means unintelligent" is so ass backwards. Many of us came from parents of the opposite ends of the spectrum for Blacks so why does it even matter?
He had people breaking down shades of fukking brown from light brown to medium brown to dark brown to dark skin and very dark skin, are you fukking serious? Is that what the next gen do? A nikka enters class and you sizing up where he stands on the paper bag test, on some "yea he cute he light medium peanut butter dash of coffee brown"I'm with you.OP knows what he's doing...discussing certain,unvisited topics about colorism I can understand because colorism is a child of racism so why not discuss it?... but what I can't wrap my head around is that people are actually INTERESTED in what other's perceive as light,medium, & dark."That's how you know someone is colorstruck.
I just feel like it doesn't have to promote anything but the actual physical trait if we don't want it to.
lololol fukk itIn an ideal world. You see these negroes, let's be real
right?In an ideal world. You see these negroes, let's be real
