yseJ
Empire strikes back
if youre counting on bunch of media members to disregard that brady in 2009 was coming off surgery and not let that impact their voting at all....oh wait they did !█ W.D.Y.D. █;2323685 said:You don't have any facts to back up what you're saying. There is no established list of criteria. It's subjectively awarded. If you're counting on a bunch of media members to completely disregard that Manning is coming off surgery, and not let that impact their voting at all...you're gonna be severely disappointed. And I'm not arguing that it should help his cause, just being realistic that it will.
ok, he was around top 5 there, not top 3. still, he was in the ballpark of other qbs that competed for the award, but his team had the most wins by FAR2008 Manning was not one of the top 3 QBs in terms of yardarge or TDs.
in comparison brees and rivers teams were 8-8
warners team was 9-7
rodgers team was 6-10
whats the last time voters gave award to a 9-7 or 8-8 team qb ?
every list has exceptions.You're out here trying to tell me the criteria and can't even come up with a concrete set list. Yours has exceptions, and "or so"s.
I told you the criteria. take top qbs and see which one has best record. 2008, manning had 12-4 record. closest competing qb had 9-7 record. end of story...
your claim that voters care about injuries or surgeries has zero basis to it. ZERO
why didnt tom brady get the mvp in 2009 then ? or was even close to it ?
why didnt favre get in 2009 ?