We Are Still Confused As To Why Coronavirus Is Not Killing Africans – European Scientist

truth2you

All Star
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
2,957
Reputation
960
Daps
6,941
It's most likely a mix between diet, and environment

The virus doesn't like warm, and humid, environments. Right above subsaharan Africa is a desert, so the virus can't travel so easy from the north

The Average African diet is whole food, and the soluble fiber of those diets help grow good bacteria which enhances the immune system.

It's the same with India, the virus isn't going crazy there, and India is right next to China

UTSW researchers and international collaborators find human protein that potently inhibits coronavirus

India has an innate, natural defence against coronavirus?
 

Gunz&Butta

All Star
Joined
Nov 9, 2017
Messages
4,947
Reputation
510
Daps
10,577
Reppin
DMV
Native Americans domesticated corn 10,000 years ago and had been raising squash, beans, pumpkins, plums, gourds, etc. way before Europeans got here.​



No one said otherwise​


Europeans had been trading with Africans since Ancient Egypt and Rome were Known-world superpowers. Africa was relatively 'across the street' compared to the Americas. We have proof of this from Ancient Egyptian, Roman, Greek, and Mesopotamian records all the way back to the 13th century BCE.​



I'm about as European as you are informed on this subject.

:coffee:
Why do you keep talking about corn and pumpkin when rice, cotton, and tobacco were clearly the cash crops of the South?

Again, you are clearly ignorant or trolling when you refer to Africa as "across the street". What does Romans going to Egypt have to do with the Trans Atlantic slave trade? Do you know where the gulf of Guinea is compared to Egypt?:gucci:
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,063
Reputation
8,154
Daps
122,279
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Gunz&Butta said:
Why do you keep talking about corn and pumpkin when rice, cotton, and tobacco were clearly the cash crops of the South?

Because my argument is that most Native Americans were farmers. They even grew tobacco and cotton before Europeans got here.
Gunz&Butta said:
Again, you are clearly ignorant or trolling when you refer to Africa as "across the street". What does Romans going to Egypt have to do with the Trans Atlantic slave trade? Do you know where the gulf of Guinea is compared to Egypt?:gucci:

No matter how you slice it, Africa is closer to Europe than the Americas and, at the time, FAR easier to navigate to than across the Atlantic Ocean. Couple those facts with the facts that European indentured servants were protected by European laws while Africans were not, West/Central Africans were already trading slaves with them since the 15th Century CE, and Native Americans were familiar with the land and your argument is little more than dap-fishing ignorance.

Portugal is only 1500 mi. away from the Canary Islands and navigators could keep land in-sight the entire trip. By comparison, Portugal is over 5,000 mi. over open water from the East Coast of the United States.​
 

alpo

Dade County carol city
Bushed
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,473
Reputation
95
Daps
35,749
Reppin
Carol city
THIS shyt WAS CREATED TO WIPE
OUT AFRICA BUT BACK FIRED...
THATS WHY CACS ARE SO PUZZLED.

THE CHINESE HAVE BEEN TRYING
TO COLONIZE AFRICA
SO THEY CLEARLY TRIED TO BRING
THAT shyt OVER THERE
CONSIDERING HOW DEEP THERE ARE
ON THE CONTINENT.
:devil:
:evil:


:ohhh::feedme:
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,602
Reputation
-17,841
Daps
84,262
Reppin
NULL
Black people dont' have to date out to mix. Everyone else does. Based on geneticists African dna is already variable and across the map, so they mix MORE when they procreate with another African.

The same way GM makes more various types of cars than KIA so GM has more of a variety. Africans are so diverse within so they dont have to mix with non African to get the best from both parents..

True to a degree. A lot of that diversity is due to mixture that happened in the ancient past (see East Africa). Still its best to mate with someone who is the most distant from you genetically. Your best odds are if the person is another race.
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,602
Reputation
-17,841
Daps
84,262
Reppin
NULL
Inappropriate Behavior
Idk about that

Its actually been scientifically validated. But if science doesn't convince you then use your eyes. There's a reason mixed kids are usually good looking even if neither parent is. That's a sign of genetic fitness. Attributes like beauty evolved as markers for us to tell who in the opposite sex has the best genes.

Mixed kids look the best. That means they have the best genes.
 

TEH

Veteran
Joined
Jul 24, 2015
Messages
47,496
Reputation
13,427
Daps
193,834
Reppin
....
Oh now Coli brehs wanna be African lmfao all yall mofos can die
:blessed:
Breh

we are all brothers

full
 
Top