Is this another one of your ridiculous etymological connection claims? Boring!
re-read
ageofempires.fandom.com
ive thought about this lately too
ive thought about this lately too
but from my perspective, the concept of dimension itself may be poorly understood. ie we arbitrarily assume discrete steps for dimensions
furthermore, given that we are born the way we are, i would say God intended us to view reality from this perspective. Consider how much we perceive just here?!?
If we were meant to see and interact with higher and lower dimensional worlds it would be intrinsic to our nature. Even the green slice I'm not so sure we can be sure we know that we know
i still say knowledge in itself is not fully understood, given its plastic nature. Ive never been the type to enjoy or entertain "demonology" but to me those things come purely from bad knowledge or rather knowledge that begins to subjugate its host.
"Our witness"
Socratic daimonion
Alcibiades Receiving Instruction from Socrates, a 1776 painting by François-André Vincent, depicting Socrates's daimon.[140]
In several texts (e.g., Plato's Euthyphro 3b5; Apology 31c–d; Xenophon's Memorabilia 1.1.2) Socrates claims he hears a daimōnic sign—an inner voice heard usually when he was about to make a mistake. Socrates gave a brief description of this daimonion at his trial (Apology 31c–d): "...The reason for this is something you have heard me frequently mention in different places—namely, the fact that I experience something divine and daimonic, as Meletus has inscribed in his indictment, by way of mockery. It started in my childhood, the occurrence of a particular voice. Whenever it occurs, it always deters me from the course of action I was intending to engage in, but it never gives me positive advice. It is this that has opposed my practicing politics, and I think its doing so has been absolutely fine."[141] Modern scholarship has variously interpreted this Socratic daimōnion as a rational source of knowledge, an impulse, a dream or even a paranormal experience felt by an ascetic Socrates.[142]
Interestingly, Sh'moth 2:12 is one of at least three occasions in the Tanach where the disastrous consequences of uttering the Four-Lettered Divine Name to the people it was spoken against is borne out (as evidenced by verse 14). Firstly, there is no word 'looked' in verse 12, and neither does that verse say 'killed'; the words used are וַיִּפֶן wayyifan ('and he turned') and וַיַּךְ wayyach ('and he attacked' or 'struck'). More to the point, the implication of 'he turned here and there and saw that there was no man' is not that 'no one was watching' but rather that he perceived prophetically that 'no man' who would ever serve Hashem was destined to emerge from that worthless Egyptian. Secondly, the wording of verse 14 is הַלְהָרְגֵנִי אַתָּה אֹמֵר כַּאֲשֶׁר הָרַגְתָּ אֶת־הַמִּצְרִי hal'hor'geni ʾattoh ʾomer kaʾashar horag'to ʾath hamissri, which literally means 'do you mean to say [something] and kill me in the same way that you killed that Egyptian?'—which the midrosh 'Sh'moth Rabboh' 1:32 understands to mean that Moshah 'killed' the Egyptian by speaking the shem ham'forosh (the 'Explicit Name') at him. But, in any event, Moshah killed that Egyptian to prevent him taking an innocent life, which he had a positive duty to do so.
We read that division two months ago alongside ʾUnq'los's Targum... while you lot were hungover from your 'New Year's' celebrations.
Animals of Set | Age of Empires Series Wiki | Fandom
All my posts have linked symbolic meanings (thus the theme of illusion)
You seem to be overlooking one simple fact of grammar... the Tanach's opening sentence is not about a grand 'Beginning of Everything', but just says that ʾAlohim's first creative act vis-à-vis Heaven and Earth was to call 'light' into existence:
On a similar tack, it is interesting to note that while אוֹר ʾor ('light') needed to be created, ʾAlohim never said יְהִי חֹשֶׁךְ y'hi hoshach ('There should be darkness!') since, indeed, חֹשֶׁךְ hoshach ('darkness') already existed ('וְחֹשֶׁךְ עַל־פְּנֵי תְהוֹם', B'reshıth 1:2). Why? Because 'darkness' is simply the absence of light; it is only necessary to create one of the two in order to have the other. What's more, the word יְהִי y'hi in verse 3 is not an imperative. It is equivalent to יִהְיֶה yih'yah and means 'it will be' or 'it should be' or even 'let it be'; thus וַיֹּאמֶר אֱלֹקִים יְהִי אוֹר וַיְּהִי אוֹר should correctly be rendered ʾAlohim said: 'There should be light!'—so there was light. If you think about it, the imperative form of a verb used in that place would mean that ʾAlohim was commanding 'light' to start existing, and the structure of the main clause (1:3) would then have to be something to the effect of Then ʾAlohim said to the light [which did not yet even exist]: 'Come into being!'—which is nonsense.
As our commentator Rash"i points out, the issue of טוֹב ṭov versus רַע raʿ ('good' versus 'evil') can be approached through two routes, that is, the philosophical and the theological, because he writes in B'reshıth 1:4
www.thecoli.com
was Justinian responsible for Revelation? 
Methuselah's father Enoch, who does not die but is taken by God, is the seventh patriarch, and Methuselah, the eighth, dies in the year of the Flood, which ends the ten-generational sequence from Adam to Noah, in whose time the world is destroyed.[33] Boia believes that Methuselah serves the symbolic function of linking the Creation and the Flood, as Adam would have died during Methuselah's lifetime and Methuselah could have learned about the Garden of Eden from Adam.[34] The kings of the Sumerian King List lived for over a thousand years, and Mesopotamians believed both that living over a thousand years made someone divine or somewhat divine, and that their contemporary kings were descended from the kings of the Sumerian King List.[citation needed] Robert Gnuse hypothesizes that the author of Genesis made all of its characters die before they turned one-thousand as a polemic against these Mesopotamian beliefs, as well as any claim that a king is divine. Gnuse also believes that the author of Genesis said that Methuselah died before he lived a thousand years to show that he was not divine.
Lightsaberfish of Kurumi Tokisaki
Montu - Wikipedia
Official Count to 1 Trillion Thread
given that there are multiple living entities sharing the same space, id say considering ourselves like sub-realities is probably a smart choice
