WBC/IBF RANKINGS! NEW SYSTEM! LEAGUE!

[AkaDemiK]

He battled tek and won by more than 20 votes.

oh word...I missed it...my fault. Aight so homie is 1-0, remove him from my argument. We still need a rank system for both divisions, I didn't even know he battled because I don't see a record for him anywhere...I have to go looking for his battle to tally up his record...that's gonna be a problem fam.

My rank system after these recent battles

D1 Producers-WBC

@@KushSkywalker 1-0 [Champ]

@@901Cory10 [1-0]

@@Sincere Noble [0-0]

@@bigrodthe1 [0-0]

@@DBR [0-0]

@@MichaelWhite [0-0]

@@AkaDemiK [0-0]

@@PUT IN WORK [0-0]

@@Chubbs [0-0]

@@producingfire [0-1]

@@TEKBEATZ [0-1]

I think if ppl saw this get updated on a weekly basis they would be even more hungry to battle and prove themselves.

 

[producingfire]

oh word...I missed it...my fault. Aight so homie is 1-0, remove him from my argument. We still need a rank system for both divisions, I didn't even know he battled because I don't see a record for him anywhere...I have to go looking for his battle to tally up his record...that's gonna be a problem fam.

After next week everyone in the WBC would have at least one battle under there belt.
Then it will become easier to handle this stuff.

 

[AkaDemiK]

After next week everyone in the WBC would have at least one battle under there belt.
Then it will become easier to handle this stuff.

is everyone guaranteed to battle or are you hoping the rest of the guys battle? I think battling needs to be a bit more forced instead of "hey battle when you feel like it"..which is why a rank system is needed. What about the IBF...is there an accurate number of ppl in that division? I know it says "everyone" else on the first page, but I think it's better to have actual names and a set number of ppl so we know who is actually in that division to get a proper rank system for them as well.

There were a decent number of spars though...so I know these nikkas wanna do this right...we just need the system to be perfect for everything to work flawlessly.

 

[KillSpray]

is everyone guaranteed to battle or are you hoping the rest of the guys battle? I think battling needs to be a bit more forced instead of "hey battle when you feel like it"..which is why a rank system is needed. What about the IBF...is there an accurate number of ppl in that division? I know it says "everyone" else on the first page, but I think it's better to have actual names and a set number of ppl so we know who is actually in that division to get a proper rank system for them as well.

There were a decent number of spars though...so I know these nikkas wanna do this right...we just need the system to be perfect for everything to work flawlessly.

Yeah you bringing up a lot of good points. It's a work in progress for sure, and the more people bring suggestions the better. I agree with you on coming up with a way to make setting up matches more clear and less open ended. The thing I'm worried about with the ranking is who's gonna keep it updated over the long term. Maybe we should get everyone into at least 1 battle before we figure out how to rank. Ive already been in 2, so I can see how it could he weird.

I was def disappointed at people missing deadlines, and it seems people are probably more confused about what's going on than anything else. On the plus side I think the beats have been better.

 

[AkaDemiK]

Yeah you bringing up a lot of good points. It's a work in progress for sure, and the more people bring suggestions the better. I agree with you on coming up with a way to make setting up matches more clear and less open ended. The thing I'm worried about with the ranking is who's gonna keep it updated over the long term. Maybe we should get everyone into at least 1 battle before we figure out how to rank. Ive already been in 2, so I can see how it could he weird.

I was def disappointed at people missing deadlines, and it seems people are probably more confused about what's going on than anything else. On the plus side I think the beats have been better.

Yeah it's def a work in progress and the potential is a lot higher than the previous league (which was still great...shouts to tom foolery). The competition is also better, I agree. I think the rankings will be fairly simple to keep updated, sticky every battle for each week so we know exactly where they are without having to dig and miss them and one of the guys who created this new system can do the records and the ranks (Also, I think no battle should go longer than a week, we should be able to get atleast 15-20 votes for a winner within a week). At the same time each competitor can also post their record in their respective threads (WBC/IBF) to help make it easier on the person updated the ranks.

Props on already battling twice, that's a good look. I agree with getting everyone into at least one battle before we rank guys, but the problem with that compared to the previous league system is that battles aren't set on a schedule so ppl will be more "lazy" with setting up bouts and it will lead to the waiting game, it's been 2 weeks now since we've had the new system I think and how many official bouts have there been? It should be mandatory for everyone to have at least one battle per week or they get dropped from the ranks and aren't allowed to compete anymore. If not, we're going to be seeing ppl with 2-1 records after like 6 weeks n shyt lol...3 battles in that amount of time would be terrible.

 

[Sincere Noble]

I faced DBR for the right to be the number one contender and pulled it out

 

[AkaDemiK]

I faced DBR for the right to be the number one contender and pulled it out

This is what confuses me and i'm not saying you don't deserve a shot at the title but how would that one battle give you priority over any other WBC competitor? especially considering your record [1-0] after that battle and other guys who have as many or will have as many wins as you? This shyt shyt seems like a first come first served type of thing...i'm not feeling that.

First I heard it was Cory who had a shot, now this. We need structure fellas.

 

[producingfire]

This is what confuses me and i'm not saying you don't deserve a shot at the title but how would that one battle give you priority over any other WBC competitor? especially considering your record [1-0] after that battle and other guys who have as many or will have as many wins as you? This shyt shyt seems like a first come first served type of thing...i'm not feeling that.

First I heard it was Cory who had a shot, now this. We need structure fellas.

Sincere battled the first week for a number 1 contender spot. and negotiated his tittle match for this upcoming card. Cory isn't guaranteed a shot. I was only saying the way he beat tech stands to reason he could have one in the future. if you and cory negotiated for a shot the same week. then we would have to review all of the wins etc.

 

[AkaDemiK]

Sincere battled the first week for a number 1 contender spot. and negotiated his tittle match for this upcoming card. Cory isn't guaranteed a shot. I was only saying the way he beat tech stands to reason he could have one in the future. if you and cory negotiated for a shot the same week. then we would have to review all of the wins etc.

I hear you...but it's exactly what i said it felt like...a first come, first saved type of thing. Boxing isn't like that and if we're going to mirror it we need to do it the right way. Let Kush hold that belt for a few weeks and everyone else needs to get around 3-4 wins before they can challenge him. By the time someone gets 3-4 wins we will have an understanding of who is ranked where (below Kush) and the person with the highest number of wins gets to challenge him (it may turn out to be none of the guys in here that wants to to challenge for the belt). I just don't agree with someone battling once and being able to get a title shot (ironic because i wanted a shot till i thought this through), it's going to be too many 1-0 records floating out there to give it one person instead of the other.

 

[bigrodthe1]

I hear you...but it's exactly what i said it felt like...a first come, first saved type of thing. Boxing isn't like that and if we're going to mirror it we need to do it the right way. Let Kush hold that belt for a few weeks and everyone else needs to get around 3-4 wins before they can challenge him. By the time someone gets 3-4 wins we will have an understanding of who is ranked where (below Kush) and the person with the highest number of wins gets to challenge him (it may turn out to be none of the guys in here that wants to to challenge for the belt). I just don't agree with someone battling once and being able to get a title shot (ironic because i wanted a shot till i thought this through), it's going to be too many 1-0 records floating out there to give it one person instead of the other.

And like you said in one of your previous posts...all you are going to have is folks wanting to challenge Kush and not each other. Plus none of the IBF guys will ever make it into the WBC league so they won't have any motivation at all. We have to get better structure.

 

[KillSpray]

And like you said in one of your previous posts...all you are going to have is folks wanting to challenge Kush and not each other. Plus none of the IBF guys will ever make it into the WBC league so they won't have any motivation at all. We have to get better structure.

I agree with you and @AkaDemiK so let's brain storm on how to create more structure. We're onto something just needs a little more fleshing out.

 

[bigrodthe1]

Also no one is voting. Our(Ak & I) battle thread only has 11 votes and Killspray/Zeus only has 5. NO way that talented Beatmakers are going to put a lot of time and effort into a beat to get no feedback on it. Sorry but I don't see this format working without some serious tweaking.

 

[AkaDemiK]

Also no one is voting. Our(Ak & I) battle thread only has 11 votes and Killspray/Zeus only has 5. NO way that talented Beatmakers are going to put a lot of time and effort into a beat to get no feedback on it. Sorry but I don't see this format working without some serious tweaking.

I agree...these votes are looking rough right now. It needs to be a requirement for guys to vote on at least one battle per week.

 

[AkaDemiK]

I agree with you and @AkaDemiK so let's brain storm on how to create more structure. We're onto something just needs a little more fleshing out.

Proposed Changes to the WBC/IBF Divisions:

• Rank system

1. There has to be a rank system, one that shows the best and worst beat makers in each division based on wins/losses. Without a rank system there is chaos, there will be no proper understanding of who the best beat makers are and challenging opponents/champions will turn into a race instead of being earned.
2. The Ranks should be updated every week, specifically every Sunday.
3. Anyone ranked between 2nd-6th can only challenge those in that specific range. Anyone ranked 7th can challenge guys ranging from 5-11. Anyone ranked 8th and below can only challenge those ranked 7th-11th.
4. You can only challenge someone in your tier once per month.
5. You need to have a minimum of 4 wins to challenge for the title. Also, only those ranked 2nd-6th can challenge for the title and priority goes to the guy with the best record who is next in line for a shot at the belt.
6. You can only challenge once per month for the title. If you lose you will have to wait till the month before issuing another challenge. Also, because of rule #4 if you were ranked 2nd and lost to the champion, you will have to wait till the the guys ranked 3rd-6th get a shot in that month, that is if you are still ranked in the top 6 after losing, if not you have to fight your way back up before challenging for the title. Also, because of the wait you may not be able to challenge for the title for more than a month, this puts added pressure on each competitor to be at their best every week.
7. Title holders are required to defend their belts once per month. This is to prevent the title from being passed around every week. Being ranked #1 gives you a chance to rest for 3 weeks out of a month, you worked hard for it so you've earned that right.
8. The first month of competition will feature no champion in either division. Everyone has to battle during this month and at the end whoever has the best record in either division will be crowned champion.

• Battles

1. Each competitor should be required to battle at least once per week (except the tile holders) to keep each division active.
2. Each battle should be active for a week. They should also be stickied/first page'd for the week and then locked after the week concludes (set thread option to lock after 7 days).
3. Each battle should be the first to 15 or 20 votes. 15 votes for normal bouts and 20 for championship bouts.
4. Battles should only be posted by a 3rd party (ppl running the competition) not by the participants in the bout. This makes it more professional and the author of the thread can add some story to the battle as they see fit.
5. Each competitor has a set date to send their beat to the 3rd party in charge of creating the thread for the bout. If 48 hrs passed without an explanation then the battle is cancelled and the person who was late will be suspended from battling for a week.
6. Every battle counts towards your rank, unless it's a spar.
7. Each competitor is required to vote onat least one battle per week. No exceptions.

• Divisions

1. Both the WBC and the IBF should be tiered based. Each division should have one champion ranked 1st, Contenders ranked 2nd-6th and Challengers ranked 7th and below. Each tier will have rules tied to them like I previously mentioned.
2. You can only challenge someone in your tier once per month.
3. You can lose your position in your division. WBC competitors ranked 7th and below can be challenged by those ranked 2nd-6th in the IBF. If the WBC competitor loses he will be sent to the IBF and ranked based on his current record. If the IBC competitor wins he will be sent to the WBC and ranked based on his current record, if he loses he will stay in the IBF and move up/down based on his record.
4. The IBF champion has to successfully defend his belt 2 times before he can move on to the WBC where he will occupy a rank based on his record. The person at the bottom of the WBC will be moved to IBF and occupy a rank based on his record.

• Weekly Cards and Monthly PPV's

1. Regular cards will take place during the first 3 weeks of a month with the final week being the PPV.
2. Cards and PPV's will be posted 8:00 pm on Sundays and will be closed 7:00 pm on Sunday the following week.
3. Cards will consist of one Main Event and 5 Under-card bouts.
4. Main Events are battles between the 2nd and 3rd ranked competitors. Under-cards are battles between the guys ranked 4th and below.
5. Main Events will be the first to 20 votes and the Under-Card will be the first to 15.
6. PPV's will consist of one Main Event and 5 Under-Card bouts. The title can only be defended at a PPV event.
7. Each competitor has to compete in at least one Card per month or they will be removed from competing in future events (except the title holder).
8. PPV will only contain battles between those in the Contender tiers (including title match).
9. Cards will contain battles between those in the Contender and Challenger tiers.

WBC

@producingfire

@KushSkywalker

@TEKBEATZ

@Sincere Noble

@bigrodthe1

@DBR

@AkaDemiK

@MichaelWhite

@PUT IN WORK

@901Cory10

@Chubbs

IBF

@Bruh Man 5th Flo

@KillSpray

@Todd McPiff

@Zeu$

@silver

@BlackDroog

@The Unknown Hype

@J_Nathan

@Kwilu

@Erebus

@illwittdeez

Is this everyone? If so that's exactly 22 competitors with 11 in each division. These are the guys I have seen battle recently or the ones I know that are active, I think we should leave it at this.

Fellas do you agree or disagree with my changes if so please leave some feedback so we can polish up this new system to perfection.

salute

 

[bigrodthe1]

Proposed Changes to the WBC/IBF Divisions:

• Rank system

1. There has to be a rank system, one that shows the best and worst beat makers in each division based on wins/losses. Without a rank system there is chaos, there will be no proper understanding of who the best beat makers are and challenging opponents/champions will turn into a race instead of being earned.
2. The Ranks should be updated every week, specifically every Sunday.
3. Anyone ranked between 2nd-6th can only challenge those in that specific range. Anyone ranked 7th can challenge guys ranging from 5-11. Anyone ranked 8th and below can only challenge those ranked 7th and below.
4. You need to have a minimum of 4 wins to challenge for the title. Also, only those ranked 2nd-6th can challenge for the title and priority goes to the guy with the best record who is next in line for a shot at the belt.
5. You can only challenge once per month for the title. If you lose you will have to wait till the month before issuing another challenge. Also, because of rule #4 if you were ranked 2nd and lost to the champion, you will have to wait till the the guys ranked 3rd-6th get a shot in that month, that is if you are still ranked in the top 6 after losing, if not you have to fight your way back up before challenging for the title. Also, because of the wait you may not be able to challenge for the title for more than a month, this puts added pressure on each competitor to be at their best every week.
6. Title holders are required to defend their belts once per month. This is to prevent the title from being passed around every week. Being ranked #1 gives you a chance to rest for 3 weeks out of a month, you worked hard for it so you've earned that right.

• Battles

1. Each competitor should be required to battle at least once per week (except the tile holders) to keep each division active.
2. Each battle should be active for a week. They should also be stickied/first page'd for the week and then locked after the week concludes.
3. Each battle should be the first to 15 or 20 votes. 15 votes for normal bouts and 20 for championship bouts.
4. Battles should only be posted by a 3rd party (ppl running the competition) not by the participants in the bout. This makes it more professional and the author of the thread can add some story to the battle as they see fit.
5. Each competitor has a set date to send their beat to the 3rd party in charge of creating the thread for the bout. If 48 hrs passed without an explanation then the battle is cancelled and the person who was late will be suspended from battling for a week.
6. Every battle counts towards your rank, unless it's a spar.
7. Each competitor is required to vote onat least one battle per week. No exceptions.

• Divisions

1. Both the WBC and the IBF should be tiered based. Each division should have one champion ranked 1st, Contenders ranked 2nd-6th and Challengers ranked 7th and below. Each tier will have rules tied to them like I previously mentioned.
2. You can lose your position in your division. WBC competitors ranked 7th and below can be challenged by those ranked 2nd-6th in the IBF. If the WBC competitor loses he will be sent to the IBF and ranked based on his current record. If the IBC competitor wins he will be sent to the WBC and ranked based on his current record, if he loses he will stay in the IBF and move up/down based on his record.
3. The IBF champion has to successfully defend his belt 2 times before he can move on to the WBC where he will occupy a rank based on his record. The person at the bottom of the WBC will be moved to IBF and occupy a rank based on his record.

• 
  
  
  • Weekly Cards and Monthly PPV's

1. Regular cards will take place during the first 3 weeks of a month with the final week being the PPV.
2. Cards will consist of one Main Event and 5 Under-card bouts.
3. Main Events are battles between the 2nd and 3rd ranked competitors. Under-cards are battles between the guys ranked 4th and below.
4. Main Events will be the first to 20 votes and the Under-Card will be the first to 15.
5. PPV's will consist of one Main Event and 5 Under-Card bouts. The title can only be defended at a PPV event.
6. Each competitor has to compete in at least one Card per month or they will be removed from competing in future events (except the title holder).
7. PPV will only contain battles between those in the Contender tiers (including title match).
8. Cards will contain battles between those in the Contender and Challenger tiers.