Washington and Golden State are close on a trade sending Chris Paul to the Warriors for Jordan Poole, sources tell @TheAthletic @Stadium

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
152,112
Reputation
28,375
Daps
513,404
Reppin
TYRONE GA!

Don Homer

Molto Bene
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
31,750
Reputation
5,712
Daps
107,761
Yup and I’m excited about it. A lot of the negativity in this thread won’t age well.
a lot of the negativity stems from the fact that they salary dumped poole to get CP0. it's a bad trade. If they could get CP0 another way, outside of giving up draft capital, i'd be fine But this trade stinks for GSW
 

Bay Area

Raiders/Warriors/A's
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
11,429
Reputation
3,210
Daps
38,665
Reppin
East Oakland
a lot of the negativity stems from the fact that they salary dumped poole to get CP0. it's a bad trade. If they could get CP0 another way, outside of giving up draft capital, i'd be fine But this trade stinks for GSW
Let’s look at it this way. Two years ago you were willing to salary dump Wiggins while attaching picks. That type of trade is more appropriate for Poole than Wiggins.
 

Don Homer

Molto Bene
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
31,750
Reputation
5,712
Daps
107,761
Let’s look at it this way. Two years ago you were willing to salary dump Wiggins while attaching picks. That type of trade is more appropriate for Poole than Wiggins.
A lot can change in 2 years :wow:

and Not for old ass CP0. no one cosigning this trade
 

Don Homer

Molto Bene
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
31,750
Reputation
5,712
Daps
107,761
I won’t form an opinion on what CP3 has left in the tank until the season starts. I don’t want to believe that he is completely washed.
if all you can get in a trade for a young 20ppg scorer is a 38 year old over the hill role player, then:

1. the young player shouldn't have been paid such a large contract
OR
2. the FO should have been much better in negotiating/evaluating talent
OR
3. Both options 1 and 2

the way the warriors FO compounds bad decision on bad decision is incredible. CP0 isnt bad per se, but for what you gave up, the return is abysmal
 

Bay Area

Raiders/Warriors/A's
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
11,429
Reputation
3,210
Daps
38,665
Reppin
East Oakland
if all you can get in a trade for a young 20ppg scorer is a 38 year old over the hill role player, then:

1. the young player shouldn't have been paid such a large contract
OR
2. the FO should have been much better in negotiating/evaluating talent
OR
3. Both options 1 and 2

the way the warriors FO compounds bad decision on bad decision is incredible. CP0 isnt bad per se, but for what you gave up, the return is abysmal
All I know is that whenever Poole entered the game during the lakers series this post season, I knew that the team was about to lose momentum :manny:
That 20 points per game is cool in the regular season but he was putting up like 7 points with no defense in the playoffs.
 

Don Homer

Molto Bene
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
31,750
Reputation
5,712
Daps
107,761
All I know is that whenever Poole entered the game during the lakers series this post season, I knew that the team was about to lose momentum :manny:
That 20 points per game is cool in the regular season but he was putting up like 7 points with no defense in the playoffs.
this is very true. but im sure the FO was so bad at negotiating that they couldn't find a better deal

EDIT: so apparently in addition to the draft capital they gave up, they also gave up PBJ. So Poole, PBJ, a protected 1st and a second round pick for ONE 38 year old chris paul :aicmon:

I dont really care about PBJ, it's just hilarious what we had to give up for one player who is close to 40 years old than 30

 

GzUp

Sleep, those slices of death; Oh how I loathe them
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
30,225
Reputation
6,675
Daps
56,789
Reppin
California
Is this good or bad for the warriors?
 
Top