Mantis Toboggan M.D.
Drink wolf cola
2011No, because Mania should not set up a payoff for another PPV.
2011No, because Mania should not set up a payoff for another PPV.
word, yes mania could've and WOULD'VE been better but they effectively got 1.4 million buys out of the same storyline and if rock got the title whats their main the next month? Rock vs. HHH with austin as ref probably, or the same result, Rock vs. HHH with HBK as ref [and taker returns]If they didn't make everything McMahon centric, then they could've had the same main event as Backlash. I get wanting to give Foley some shine too and a spot at Mania after all he had done and everything, but to me just a HHH/Rock main event would've sufficed. Maybe a triple threat or something would've been okay, or maybe Foley could main event Backlash against Rock with a face/face title match. Although I hate altering the timeline too much, considering how piff that era is minus a few PPVs.
I don't think Vince was comfortable with hhh holding down the main event by himself. Rock was definitely big enough but hhh?Kinda...
But I would argue 2000 was the peak of Vince's company and anything with either Rock or Austin was gonna pay off and do buys.
I dont see why Wrestlemania couldnt have been Rock's proper ascension as a babyface main eventer with him winning the belt over Triple H. It may seem too simple and maybe that was a tad too predictable but it just would have worked and the Triple H-Rock rivalry would have a definitive match on a grander stage to be remembered.
Kang retaining at WM2000 was
No as a mark that shyt hurt in 2000 to end mania like that but business wise it was genius
There next few ppvs did huge buyrates
That's cause the product was on fire, nothing to do with WM2000There next few ppvs did huge buyrates
Backlash was huge cuz of it and the ratings showed a bigger spikeThat's cause the product was on fire, nothing to do with WM2000