Was Joshua actually the son of the Egyptian God Nu/Nun?

Leasy

Let's add some Alizarin Crimson & Van Dyke Brown
Supporter
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
44,815
Reputation
4,407
Daps
97,585
Reppin
Philly (BYRD GANG)
Egypt isn't even older than sumer. The ancient civilizations of the world were pretty much contemporaries, it isn't correct to say Egypt is the root of all belief systems. Egypt had some influence on regional belief systems and culture , that's it.

Again false information by racist so called archaeologist back in the day.

The Sphinx itself is ten thousand years old as it construction was based off the Leo constellation which was directly over top Kemet 10000 BC. They used the stars as measurements etc.... So they couldn't had build it later.

Ethiopia folklore tells when Africans went up there and it was once covered by water the entire land. Go by racist time history brehs
 

GetInTheTruck

Member
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,661
Reputation
-741
Daps
27,699
Reppin
Queens
Again false information by racist so called archaeologist back in the day.

The Sphinx itself is ten thousand years old as it construction was based off the Leo constellation which was directly over top Kemet 10000 BC. They used the stars as measurements etc.... So they couldn't had build it later.

Ethiopia folklore tells when Africans went up there and it was once covered by water the entire land. Go by racist time history brehs

Racist? The Nile wasn't even settled until 7000 BC. Just stop.
 

Leasy

Let's add some Alizarin Crimson & Van Dyke Brown
Supporter
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
44,815
Reputation
4,407
Daps
97,585
Reppin
Philly (BYRD GANG)
Racist? The Nile wasn't even settled until 7000 BC. Just stop.

Where are you getting your information because as I said they build and measure by the stars. Leo ocnstellation was directly over Egypt 10000 plus even carbon dating proves it. Don't say this guy built this or that as Pharoahs were known to plagiarize other temples and creations before them.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,650
Reputation
8,104
Daps
121,503
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Leasy said:
Where are you grtting this Massey shyt from when half of the stories and idealogy are on the walls. Egypt documented everything.

Everything but their losses.

Most of your assertions stem from Gerald Massey's books and if not directly from him, from authors who used his writing as source material.​
 
Last edited:

GetInTheTruck

Member
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,661
Reputation
-741
Daps
27,699
Reppin
Queens
Where are you getting your information because as I said they build and measure by the stars. Leo ocnstellation was directly over Egypt 10000 plus even carbon dating proves it. Don't say this guy built this or that as Pharoahs were known to plagiarize other temples and creations before them.

You're basing this all on:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoarchaeology
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,650
Reputation
8,104
Daps
121,503
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Last edited:

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,650
Reputation
8,104
Daps
121,503
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Leasy said:
The Sphinx itself is ten thousand years old as it construction was based off the Leo constellation which was directly over top Kemet 10000 BC. They used the stars as measurements etc.... So they couldn't had build it later.

This is false. That theory was developed by Robert Schoch based on flawed methodology. The Sphinx isn't 10,000 years old.

More information here:

http://www.thecoli.com/posts/7412689/

Matter of fact, I debunked YOU stating this very thing way back here:

http://www.thecoli.com/posts/8471060/
Many members of the public have been captivated by recent books and video presentations concerning the pyramids and the sphinx of ancient Egypt. The books by Graham Hancock, Robert Bauval and Adrian Gilbert make the rather astounding proposal that the layout of the site at Giza goes back to 10500 BC. In archaeological terms, it is somewhat preposterous, to say the least. But the basis for fixing that date lies in astronomy. Bauval, in particular, explains the workings of precession, and sees it as the key to fixing the time of the layout back in the distant past.

The topic is one well suited to a planetarium. Based on lectures that I had given to our local Egyptian Society in the planetarium in Cape Town, I designed and scripted a prerecorded presentation (that opened in December 1998). I had found the Bauval argument ingenious, but somewhat unconvincing. However, further checks revealed further holes, as I shall report below.

The pyramids have a strong astronomical association. The four faces of an Egyptian pyramid are precisely aligned with the four cardinal points of the compass. Given that the Egyptians never recognised a North pole on the Earth, they could have only done this by means of the rotation of the sky about the North Celestial Pole. The most obvious way of fixing azimuthal North would be by the symmetry of the rising and setting points of stars. The great pyramid of Khufu is level to a centimetre and aligned to a twentieth of a degree, a tribute to the accuracy of ancient surveying skills.

Khufu's pyramid also contains four "star shafts", aimed towards the meridian in the sky. When the pyramid was built (c. 2500 BC), these shafts aimed at the transitpoints of Thuban (Alpha Draconis - then pole star), Orion's Belt, Sirius and Kochab (Beta Ursa Minoris), clearly intentionally and not coincidentally. The shafts apparently served to direct the ka, or spirit, of the dead pharaoh towards these key stars. Thuban and Kochab were circumpolar "Imperishable ones" (stars that never die), Orion represented the deity Osiris, and Sirius his consort, Isis. Precession has since changed the transit points, so the shafts no longer function in this manner.

Khufu's pyramid is the largest of a line of three - together with that of Khafre and the much smaller pyramid of Menkaure. Given the surveying skills of the Egyptians, many have wondered why the line of the three pyramids is slightly crooked. One possibility is that the design would allow for the smaller pyramid to be later enlarged (retaining its south and east faces) to form a straight line of three almost identical pyramids. Another is that the deviation of the line closely matches that of the three stars of Orion's Belt - which are also slightly crooked. This has suggested that the lay out at Giza may be an attempt to portray Orion's Belt. If so, the orientation of the line, with respect to the cardinal points, is wrong - for 2500 BC. Precession, however, changes the angle that the Belt makes in the sky. Bauval claims that going back to 10500 BC gives "a perfect match".

Or does it? My own investigation showed that, while the line of the two outer pyramids is set 38 degrees from north, the angle of Orion's Belt to north in 10500 BC is close on 50 degrees! Hardy an exact match. I calculate that circular precessional motion would give 47 degrees, whereas including nutational terms makes it slightly higher. Measurements in the planetarium agree. Bauval, on the other hand appears to have used computer programmes. He implies that only with modern sophisticated computers can we examine the ancient skies! I wonder if he also made the mistake of measuring angles off a flat screen.

Bauval's choice of 10500 BC (when Orion is furthest south in its precessional cycle) also supposedly fits with the Milky Way aligning with the Nile. But the course of the Nile is variable, and we do not now know where it ran in 10500 BC with any accuracy.

A parallel assertion of Hancock and Bauval is to say that 10500 BC would be during the astrological "Age of the Lion" - a connoctation they seek with the sphinx. However the Vernal Equinox of 10500 BC would lie at 2000: 11h40m, +2.2 degress, which though close to the star pattern we now know as Leo, still lies decidedly in Virgo. Again, not a perfect match.

Finally, as my colleague in the planetarium world, Ed Krupp, has pointed out, the otherwise straight line of the pyramids is deformed towards the north, but the line of Orion's Belt is deformed towards the south.

The astronomical basis for arguing that the layout at Giza goes back to 10500BC is therefore very thin. It would be well if more could be done to counter the publicity of books, put out to the public, that base so much conjecture upon such flimsy science.
 
Last edited:

Leasy

Let's add some Alizarin Crimson & Van Dyke Brown
Supporter
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
44,815
Reputation
4,407
Daps
97,585
Reppin
Philly (BYRD GANG)
The Ark was taken from Solomon's Temple in Israel by Shishak (Sheshonq 1, 22nd Dynasty 945-924 BCE) in the 10th Century BCE.

This is documented in 1 Kings 14:25-26.

There are inscriptions of Sheshonq's campaign into Palestine on the wall of the temple of Amon in Karnak.​

Solomon was based off an Egyptian Pharoah and didn't exist breh. No record of your Hebrew people during a time when ever damn thing was documented. There is however a record of a Pharoah exodus with his people.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,650
Reputation
8,104
Daps
121,503
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Leasy said:
Solomon was based off an Egyptian Pharoah and didn't exist breh.

Nah. There is no Pharaoh that he was based on.​

Leasy said:
No record of your Hebrew people during a time when ever damn thing was documented.

1 Kings documents it and there are hieroglyphs in the Temple of Amon in Karnak.

MY 'Hebrew' people? Now you're projecting. My ancestors are from Western Africa.
Leasy said:
There is however a record of a Pharoah exodus with his people.

That's nice, but doesn't prove anything you've said thus far.​
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,650
Reputation
8,104
Daps
121,503
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Leasy said:

Guess you missed this.......​

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited said:
The Ark was taken from Solomon's Temple in Israel by Shishak (Sheshonq 1, 22nd Dynasty 945-924 BCE) in the 10th Century BCE.

This is documented in 1 Kings 14:25-26.

There are inscriptions of Sheshonq's campaign into Palestine on the wall of the temple of Amon in Karnak.
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-150
Daps
65,108
Reppin
NULL
the eye that they are talking about isn't the third eye, its the eye in general. You have to read the whole bible to interpret it. Also the 'evil' eye would literally be in Hebrew Ayin rah. The letter Alef is used in the word Alaheim, like in the word Abba for father, or for Abraham There is no letter for 'e' in Hebrew. the Hebrew language changed when Hebrews were captured in Babylonian captivity, it was there 'a' became 'e' from Babylonian Aramaic. its where Yahusha, the Hebrew Name of the Messiah and Joshua, became yeshua. Where yasha became yeshua, this is because they were removing the Name of Alaheim from record, Yah becomes yeh, Alaheim becomes eloheim.

the reason why im disappointed is because based on your posts I thought you were in the truth, but you are not. you are a satanist just like the rest of them.

The Eye in general....come on G, that sounds like a answer people make up when they don't know. Interpretation doesn't mean you know it as fact, it's meaning means this to you is what interpretation means. You can't be disappointed in someone you don't know. The Most High knows what's in my heart. Again not answering my full address to you proves that I was right about Hebrew kats saying what they say. In doing my research for over 14 years, wanting to know what's going on in the world and I got a Hebrew casting stones. The irony.

You believe what you want....I won't change your mind. I know Im not here for that.
 
Top