Was Buddha A Black African Or Not?

[dontspeakmuch]

The video was uninteresting and nothing I haven't seen before.

What Buddha of China are you referring to?

You're basing your claim on Dravidians most likely being from lower castes on what exactly? Brahmins in India are split into two main groups, those from the north and those from the south, who are all dravidians. That's how it's always been. If you went to south India right now you wouldn't be able to tell anybody's caste based on their physical characteristics.

And the Buddha wasn't even a Dravidian or low caste, he was from the north eastern part of India and royalty. That right there contradicts your position.

There is a difference between chinese and indian buddha physically. The one in the china buddha is actually indian. china buddha is the fat bald one. it is true that buddha was a prince and of royalty

 

[dontspeakmuch]

Look at the video. Its about china then deals with the buddha of china. Also, a lot of indians who are of the lowest cast which most likely came from dravidians no doubt look like "black africans". The point of my post was the world was one when dealing with what we call race today. The white man was the oddball who needed to change things in order to conquer and survive. We say we know this but I dont think people UNDERSTAND how big this change in thinking was and its implication on how the WORLD has changed and how we live. Everything from how science is done, to spirituallity, to even how we view the genders role in a relationship.

any literature on this? not a website like a book with footnotes?

 

[bouncy]

The video was uninteresting and nothing I haven't seen before.

What Buddha of China are you referring to?

You're basing your claim on Dravidians most likely being from lower castes on what exactly? Brahmins in India are split into two main groups, those from the north and those from the south, who are all dravidians. That's how it's always been. If you went to south India right now you wouldn't be able to tell anybody's caste based on their physical characteristics.

And the Buddha wasn't even a Dravidian, he was from the north eastern part of India.

The thing is I want to debate with you especially on the caste system but so far I have gotten nowhere with people on this board. I show you something, you downplay it, deal woth something minor in my post, then the subject cjanges, then the dissing comes. It happens all the time. I even forgey the original thing I was arguing about. Its just a waste of time typing on this small ass phone screen. Its more about people trying to be right then us putting our minds together to find the truth.

 

[bouncy]

any literature on this? not a website like a book with footnotes?

On what?.

 

[GetInTheTruck]

This is a question that no one really asks but why do most statues or buddha show him with kinky, notty, short, hair?. it can be because they couldnt make the hair straight or tied up because the clothes hes wearing are straight and long ans it would have bwen easier. Why is this ignored?. Even my mother, who isnt into history, said it looks like buddha has a peasy head when she saw the statue. Maybe someone knows why is his hair so different from the people now?.

How is that a question that's not really asked when it's pretty much the only argument you dudes use to claim Buddha was some type of African? You can Google "Sadhu" right now and see Indians who are nowhere near African rocking locks and shyt. So what.

 

[dontspeakmuch]

On what?.

white people creating a white supremacy complex in order to cope with being the minority of the time

 

[bouncy]

@GetInTheTruck. You talked about how indians looked during buddahs time, I gave an example of how those of low caste have traits of certain africans besides the hair. You then state in anothet post buddha wad from the north which has nothing to do with the original post!. This is exactly what I stated happens during these debates in my previous post. Thabk you for proving me right.

 

[bouncy]

How is that a question that's not really asked when it's pretty much the only argument you dudes use to claim Buddha was some type of African? You can Google "Sadhu" right now and see Indians who are nowhere near African rocking locks and shyt. So what.

Locks are not notty peas. That is the whole point. Dreads are straight, a peasy head is not.

 

[GetInTheTruck]

The thing is I want to debate with you especially on the caste system but so far I have gotten nowhere with people on this board. I show you something, you downplay it, deal woth something minor in my post, then the subject cjanges, then the dissing comes. It happens all the time. I even forgey the original thing I was arguing about. Its just a waste of time typing on this small ass phone screen. Its more about people trying to be right then us putting our minds together to find the truth.

You can't debate this with me though. I just asked you to qualify your statements about Dravidians and the caste system and you ignored me. I'll ask you again:

why do you associate dravidians with low caste? Where did you learn to make that association? What do you think a Dravidian is?

also if the caste system is based on color and race then how could the Buddha have been an African when he came from royalty?

 

[dontspeakmuch]

i think his hair really looked like this
580 × 375 - mensxp.com

but that they sculpt it that way because they are fond of that style of design. peep the architecture its all stacked n swirly




580 × 375 - mensxp.com

 

[bouncy]

white people creating a white supremacy complex in order to cope with being the minority of the time

You know there isnt no one book that is going to deal with that one subject aint no publisher puttung that out. But since we know the histoeu of eugenics even before it was called that, the way the racists conquerors spoke of the peopke everyplace they went, their terms and views or themselves and others in science in the physical sense ad well as of the psychology, there is your answers there. This is what I mean by using common sense and not needing a book to verify what you see. All a book is a form of communication not the end all be all.

 

[bouncy]

You can't debate this with me though. I just asked you to qualify your statements about Dravidians and the caste system and you ignored me. I'll ask you again:

why do you associate dravidians with low caste? Where did you learn to make that association? What do you think a Dravidian is?

also if the caste system is based on color and race then how could the Buddha have been an African when he came from royalty?

You did it again. I never stated he was african. Thank you for proving my point.

 

[GetInTheTruck]

@GetInTheTruck. You talked about how indians looked during buddahs time, I gave an example of how those of low caste have traits of certain africans besides the hair. You then state in anothet post buddha wad from the north which has nothing to do with the original post!. This is exactly what I stated happens during these debates in my previous post. Thabk you for proving me right.

You're saying low castes have African traits... but the Buddha wasn't low caste, he was a prince. You making no sense. You think caste is based on race and color because youve been misled.

 

[dontspeakmuch]

You know there isnt no one book that is going to deal with that one subject aint no publisher puttung that out. But since we know the histoeu of eugenics even before it was called that, the way the racists conquerors spoke of the peopke everyplace they went, their terms and views or themselves and others in science in the physical sense ad well as of the psychology, there is your answers there. This is what I mean by using common sense and not needing a book to verify what you see. All a book is a form of communication not the end all be all.

it just would be nice to have all of that information in one place, even a pamphlet would be nice. Its also easier to teach to others if its from a book.

 

[bouncy]

i think his hair really looked like this
580 × 375 - mensxp.com

but that they sculpt it that way because they are fond of that style of design. peep the architecture its all stacked n swirly




580 × 375 - mensxp.com

That could be but i doubt it because why just him?. If he was a superior being why imitatw buildings on him?. If anything maybe those came from his hair and the architects were imitating that?.