Was Buddha A Black African Or Not?

[bouncy]

I already know that the whole world was dark-skinned originally. It wasn't whites that separated dark-skinned people because dark-skinned people already viewed each other as different.

I see where your head is and no matter what I post you wont believe it if it isnt what you want to believe. You obviously have no idea how war works.

You're different from your cousin right?.

White racism changed everything because it claimed all men were different and whites were the higher form of man. They helped keep this belief going by mating with people of the lands they conquered and allowing those offspring to rule over the darker, original people. Since it was about being close to white the true white man was the king of the land even when he wasnt there. This idea still persists today once you see how things work at the top of society.

Looking at history you can see how this belief has changed how we are taught history. The way we aretaught is man left northeast africa, migrated east, then north and these are the times civilization began. REALLY?. Think how stupid that sounds. You mean to tell me man never went west then developed ways to sail the seas to come to the americas?. They were that dumb that they needed people from mountains and land to do that. This is what we are taught essentially.

Has it even crossed your mind the reason they even started in east africa region was because this is where christianity claims life started and w.a.s.p. believe the story of the bible is their story?. This is why they tell the history of man, basically the same way the bible tells it, totally ignoring man who would of existed in other areas out of ethiopia based on how mathematics works and things spreading out in all areas.

They have a history of white washing everything, so what makes you think they wouldnt do that to the history of man. In order to exalt himself he needed to have seperation and this was the big trick that you had put in you. As recently as the 50's they would take music from blacks and sayw hites did it and these people are still alive so what makes you think they wouldnt have done this thousamds or even hundreds of years ago. Its good to believe what you were taught in school as a base of learning but always remember who you are getting the info from and use your common sense. For most "races" they dont care to learn the truth as lomg as they look good but for blacks you NEED to learn because once you do its like you whole world opens up and you see we are all related and it really is a devil. It has nothing to do with race but character.. Once you learn how evil and slick this racists man is he is really satan or ball or whatever you want to call him. Its not just whites in general but these devils spawn from them. I was watching the bbc documentary "murderous minds of europeans" and it just added to the proof how evil these people are and how they have fukked up the world. Learning the truth lets you see it is something great that has been here and makesmyou wonder if it will return.

WE HAVE BEEN TAUGHT LIES OF HUMAN HISTORY.

 

[Drummage_EL]

I see where your head is and no matter what I post you wont believe it if it isnt what you want to believe. You obviously have no idea how war works.

You're different from your cousin right?.

White racism changed everything because it claimed all men were different and whites were the higher form of man. They helped keep this belief going by mating with people of the lands they conquered and allowing those offspring to rule over the darker, original people. Since it was about being close to white the true white man was the king of the land even when he wasnt there. This idea still persists today once you see how things work at the top of society.

Looking at history you can see how this belief has changed how we are taught history. The way we aretaught is man left northeast africa, migrated east, then north and these are the times civilization began. REALLY?. Think how stupid that sounds. You mean to tell me man never went west then developed ways to sail the seas to come to the americas?. They were that dumb that they needed people from mountains and land to do that. This is what we are taught essentially.

Has it even crossed your mind the reason they even started in east africa region was because this is where christianity claims life started and w.a.s.p. believe the story of the bible is their story?. This is why they tell the history of man, basically the same way the bible tells it, totally ignoring man who would of existed in other areas out of ethiopia based on how mathematics works and things spreading out in all areas.

They have a history of white washing everything, so what makes you think they wouldnt do that to the history of man. In order to exalt himself he needed to have seperation and this was the big trick that you had put in you. As recently as the 50's they would take music from blacks and sayw hites did it and these people are still alive so what makes you think they wouldnt have done this thousamds or even hundreds of years ago. Its good to believe what you were taught in school as a base of learning but always remember who you are getting the info from and use your common sense. For most "races" they dont care to learn the truth as lomg as they look good but for blacks you NEED to learn because once you do its like you whole world opens up and you see we are all related and it really is a devil. It has nothing to do with race but character.. Once you learn how evil and slick this racists man is he is really satan or ball or whatever you want to call him. Its not just whites in general but these devils spawn from them. I was watching the bbc documentary "murderous minds of europeans" and it just added to the proof how evil these people are and how they have fukked up the world. Learning the truth lets you see it is something great that has been here and makesmyou wonder if it will return.

WE HAVE BEEN TAUGHT LIES OF HUMAN HISTORY.

What the fukk is this essay for??? I didn't even read it. I stopped after the 1st sentence.

 

[Drummage_EL]

The problem with your post is that, you arent educated so you're making an assumption based on your perception of Africans. Kind of exposed yourself

What assumption?

 

[Drummage_EL]

My Art History prof. a Russian taught me that Egyptians influenced Greeks and the ppl of Crete who lent their skills to the mycenaeans.

Ooooooh, so it must be true because your professor said so.

 

[dontspeakmuch]

Ooooooh, so it must be true because your professor said so.

I only mentioned him because the other guy said that the idea that Egypt was a center of knowledge is only perpetuated by bias Afrocentric people. My professor, being a russian is not afro centric but confirms that Egypt was a center of knowledge. I trust him because he has been doing it a long time, he has a stash of pictures he himself has taken and he uses those not the ones in the book. He has been to a lot of places and is not some "by the book, no experience outside the classroom" educators. I see where ur coming from tho.

 

[Crakface]

What assumption?

Can someone help this idiot. I think hes try hard stupid.

 

[Drummage_EL]

Can someone help this idiot. I think hes try hard stupid.

Learn how to type a sentence correctly before you call somebody stupid.

 

[Crakface]

Learn how to type a sentence correctly before you call somebody stupid.

Read a history book before you talk about, history. Moron.

 

[Drummage_EL]

Read a history book before you talk about, history. Moron.

 

[Crakface]

So

You're insulting our intelligence with your amateur night trolling.

 

[bouncy]

What the fukk is this essay for??? I didn't even read it. I stopped after the 1st sentence.

I posted it out of anger being that most people claim to want the truth but only want what they want to hear and that is usually what they were taught from some type of authority figure. The OP is a perfect example of this just like emoney. The OP asked a question, I gave him a video to see for himself and he makes a post that has nothing to do with the point of the post, totally ignoring the video and it was to put blacks down and down playing white supremacy's effect on the world.

Emoney ignored a post I made about the moors, west africa, and the bullshyt we are taught like the original inhibitants never traveling the lands of north africa or southern europe specifically portugal until white arabs came to the land, even though its an eyes distance away from where they would have been. People just keep repeating what they heard or read never asking does it make sense?.

 

[GetInTheTruck]

Yes and no. He was black but not african. You have to change the way you were taught about how the world once was. Most people in the world were of black/brown skin and had some of the same traits to where you can see they were related. Once white racism came into play the seperation began. I dont know if this has been posted but check it out. Notice how the buddha looked. He could easily pass as an original inhabitant of a south africa.

Indians during the Buddhas time didn't look much different from Indians today - brown-dark brown skin, dark straight-wavy hair, slim builds...what traits are you talking about?

 

[bouncy]

Indians during the Buddhas time didn't look much different from Indians today - brown-dark brown skin, dark straight-wavy hair, slim builds...what traits are you talking about?

Look at the video. Its about china then deals with the buddha of china. Also, a lot of indians who are of the lowest cast which most likely came from dravidians no doubt look like "black africans". The point of my post was the world was one when dealing with what we call race today. The white man was the oddball who needed to change things in order to conquer and survive. We say we know this but I dont think people UNDERSTAND how big this change in thinking was and its implication on how the WORLD has changed and how we live. Everything from how science is done, to spirituallity, to even how we view the genders role in a relationship.

 

[GetInTheTruck]

Look at the video. Its about china then deals with the buddha of china. Also, a lot of indians who are of the lowest cast which most likely came from dravidians no doubt look like "black africans". The point of my post was the world was one when dealing with what we call race today. The white man was the oddball who needed to change things in order to conquer and survive. We say we know this but I dont think people UNDERSTAND how big this change in thinking was and its implication on how the WORLD has changed and how we live. Everything from how science is done, to spirituallity, to even how we view the genders role in a relationship.

The video was uninteresting and nothing I haven't seen before.

What Buddha of China are you referring to?

You're basing your claim on Dravidians most likely being from lower castes on what exactly? Brahmins in India are split into two main groups, those from the north and those from the south, who are all dravidians. That's how it's always been. If you went to south India right now you wouldn't be able to tell anybody's caste based on their physical characteristics.

And the Buddha wasn't even a Dravidian or low caste, he was from the north eastern part of India and royalty. That right there contradicts your position.

 

[bouncy]

This is a question that no one really asks but why do most statues or buddha show him with kinky, notty, short, hair?. it can be because they couldnt make the hair straight or tied up because the clothes hes wearing are straight and long ans it would have bwen easier. Why is this ignored?. Even my mother, who isnt into history, said it looks like buddha has a peasy head when she saw the statue. Maybe someone knows why is his hair so different from the people now?.