WalMart Destroys Jobs, Yes, But The Benefits Go To Consumers
- Thread starter DEAD7
- Start date
Consumers and workers are the same people, the net benefit is negative
prescient!
2.2 million employees worldwide vs 200 million customers
Please show me the math where it ends up being a NET negative
Dont worry ill wait.
fukk the consumerism and how it cripples our society and a double fukk to walmart and it's contributions to global capitalist hegemony :fyou2:
Its like you guys are programmed to hate Walmart. No argument need even be put forth 
You just know WalMart is evil, and thats that...
Yep. They sure are.
They are evil because they force tax payers to pick up their tab because they pay their employees like shyt. It's not a fukking mystery.
This. Also, assuming we can practically separate them into two groups, destroying jobs hurts consumers more than slightly higher prices hurts workers.
I don't blame Wal-Mart and the people shouldn't either. They should look at these faceless Politicians i.e the County Administrator and the Mayor/City Councilmen who OK'd the company to move in there and do the things that they do
Can anyone provide a link to evidence of this NET loss? Is there any hard evidence to the net negative claim, or are you guys just going to parrot it over and over? cause saying it together doesnt make it any more true...
I'd eplain how its govt. creating and handling the taxes, but your not interested in facts. 
As far as you're concerned the IRS and congress are departments at walmart.