The problem is that everyone but the player is getting paid already.Read the entire thread, was surprised no one brought up Title IX in this debate.
How can we reasonably pay male student athletes and not expect that the female student athletes are not going to be paid with parity? The revenues are vastly different, but in this climate with the equal pay conversation remaining a sensitive topic, how could the schools get away with not paying across the board?
Seems like paying the athletes will simply lead to more lawsuits. The only fix (to me anyway), seems to let the athletes get endorsements and make money off their likeness. Anything else, seems like a litigator's dream.
Read the entire thread, was surprised no one brought up Title IX in this debate.
How can we reasonably pay male student athletes and not expect that the female student athletes are not going to be paid with parity? The revenues are vastly different, but in this climate with the equal pay conversation remaining a sensitive topic, how could the schools get away with not paying across the board?
Seems like paying the athletes will simply lead to more lawsuits. The only fix (to me anyway), seems to let the athletes get endorsements and make money off their likeness. Anything else, seems like a litigator's dream.
good honest coaching for love of the game though
In 2006, former Kentucky coach Tubby Smith made $2.6 million. In the decade that followed, as Kentucky athletics earnings climbed from $68 million to $132 million, pay for the leader of its flagship team skyrocketed. In 2016, John Calipari made $8.6 million, an amount Kentucky officials justify as fair market value for a coach whose team will generate tens of millions of dollars.
I'd like an answer to this question @JALEN HURTSBut a 298 percent pay increase for the same job — Kentucky track and field coach — is startling when compared with what happened in the rest of the economy between 2006 and 2016, a time span that includes a deep recession. Median pay for the average American worker increased 0.7 percent, and even workers in the 95th percentile — those making more than 95 percent of the rest of America — saw pay rise just 13 percent, according to Elise Gould, senior economist with the Economic Policy Institute.
“It’s a system that takes money that should be rightfully going to athletes, many of whom are minorities from underprivileged backgrounds, and reallocates it to coaches and athletic directors, many of whom are middle-aged white men. . . . How can you call that just?” said Andy Schwarz, an economist who has consulted for several lawsuits against the NCAA and college conferences.
There is a long history of whites only agreeing to something when it's perceived that a white face benefits from it.The one time it took white folks to about paying college players....embodied in a millionaire white athlete
There is a long history of whites only agreeing to something when it's perceived that a white face benefits from it.
Example #1
Example #2
When whites perceive that mostly "others" are benefiting from things, they get all funny but the second a white face is the face of that benefit, they suddenly are sane about shyt.
Fix y'all ways...
Hating niqqas is the country's biggest detriment to progress.Integrated hospitals killed Single Payer?
The motherfukking GYMNASTICS coach makes six figures, but a star athlete can't make a single buck off his likeness?!
Seriously, fukk people like @JALEN HURTS
There's a program I know well where the coach makes 5 mil, his son is now the OC (the nepotism and cronyism in football is unrivaled) and already was making over $400,000 at the line coach last year, his son-in-law had no prior football experience but works for the program for right about 100K... and to top it off, the son ain't really qualified to be an OC so they just rehired their old OC to do the job in the shadows while calling him the QB coach. The grift is next level.