Using ‘he/him,’ ‘she/her’ in emails got 2 dorm directors fired at small New York Christian college

[Godless Socialist CEO]

.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Reactionary's on this board's favorite thing to do the second you present them with factual evidence via research or articles to call you emotional. Its pretty funny honestly, may as well be a white flag


One thing I appreciate about HL is most here don't take that route.

* except in the Ukraine thread

 

[Godless Socialist CEO]

* except in the Ukraine thread

I don't venture in there, I don't even think about Ukraine. We got too many problems here for me to also think about the shyt going on in Europe

 

[the cac mamba]

So you admit that I was one of the people you were talking about? You have the attention span of a gnat.

yes, i admit that you're a shill for trannies

 

[Professor Emeritus]

pick a shill in here, any shill. ask them if they believe that men should be allowed to play women's sports. they wont answer

Not only do you constantly deflect to the dumbest culture war shyt you can find, but you also like to openly lie about other posters here.

I'm 100% against anything born out of hatred and shyt, but you gotta have real rules. If testosterone got you through puberty then you shouldn't be in women's sports.

I am 100% in favor of the human rights of trans (and LGBT in general) folk. I am 100% against them getting arbitrarily discriminated against or being victimized by violence and in fact I once physically intervened when witnessing an assault. And I'm fine with calling people whatever they want to be called.

But I also believe that sex/gender really has a true biological basis, and that people born biologically male shouldn't compete in women's sports.

taking it personally when someone calls out tranny shills who mentioned you?

but im glad you agree that liberals and democrats are wrong on this issue. its just not a difficult position to take

I was one of the people arguing in here that they shouldn't have been fired, and you said, "pick a shill in here, any shill". Were you not actually referring to people making the argument for them in here? I wasn't for a moment going to imagine that I could discern what you consider a "shill", beyond yourself.

Every one of your disingenuous debate tactics is just another form of trolling. You can't even take responsibility for the dumb shyt you say.

but they should have been fired. this rule banned eveything from pronouns to bible verses in emails; these idiots thought they were special. they were not

So you admit that I was one of the people you were talking about? You have the attention span of a gnat.

yes, i admit that you're a shill for trannies

Like I said, the attention span of a fukking gnat.


* @the cac said we wouldn't answer his question
- I proved he lied and I'd answered the question multiple times
* @the cac suggested he wasn't talking about me
- I proved he was obviously talking about me
* @the cac deflects to a completely different issue
- I ask if he's admitting that I was right
* @the cac says he was talking about me, forgetting that proves he was lying

He walks in with his entire agenda based on a false claim, and then when you prove it false, he just laughs and continues on with the agenda.

He doesn't even realize he proved himself a liar yet again, because he can't maintain a coherent thought for more than 2 consecutive comments.

 

[Godless Socialist CEO]

@the cac mamba is far and away one of the most disingenuous posters I've ever across online anywhere. It's honestly impressive

 

[the cac mamba]

Like I said, the attention span of a fukking gnat.


* @the cac said we wouldn't answer his question
- I proved he lied and I'd answered the question multiple times
* @the cac suggested he wasn't talking about me
- I proved he was obviously talking about me
* @the cac deflects to a completely different issue
- I ask if he's admitting that I was right
* @the cac says he was talking about me, forgetting that proves he was lying

He walks in with his entire agenda based on a false claim, and then when you prove it false, he just laughs and continues on with the agenda.

He doesn't even realize he proved himself a liar yet again, because he can't maintain a coherent thought for more than 2 consecutive comments.

you took it upon yourself to quote me, in self defense, when i made a post calling out trans shills. NOT you by name

embarrassing

 

[the cac mamba]

@the cac mamba is far and away one of the most disingenuous posters I've ever across online anywhere. It's honestly impressive

and yet, when i ask "should men with a penis be allowed to play women's sports? are the republicans right or wrong about that"?

your direct, non-disingenuous answer is; what? let's see if you go out as badly as AquaCityThey

 

[Professor Emeritus]

you took it upon yourself to quote me, in self defense, when i made a post calling out trans shills. NOT you by name

embarrassing

You just looped back around to an already debunked argument point for the third time in that string.

Like I said, a fukking gnat. Next are you going to repeat yourself again and say they should have been fired?

and yet, when i ask "should men with a penis be allowed to play women's sports? are the republicans right or wrong about that"?

your direct, non-disingenuous answer is; what?

Why are you ignoring my direct, non-disingenuous answer? Your claim that no one would answer it was already proven wrong, so what is there left for you to fish for?

 

[the cac mamba]

You just looped back around to an already debunked argument point for the third time in that string.

Like I said, a fukking gnat. Next are you going to repeat yourself again and say they should have been fired?






Why are you ignoring my direct, non-disingenuous answer? Your claim that no one would answer it was already proven wrong, so what is there left for you to fish for?

go crack a bud light and relax

 

[Professor Emeritus]

@the cac mamba is far and away one of the most disingenuous posters I've ever across online anywhere. It's honestly impressive

He's straight up a forum final boss. You could drop him in any forum in the world and he could post in any thread with equal intelligence and integrity, without end. It's pretty much impossible to beat him, because for him to lose would require his acknowledging that rational arguments or objective facts even exist, and he's learned long ago not to do that.

 

[AquaCityBoy]

and yet, when i ask "should men with a penis be allowed to play women's sports? are the republicans right or wrong about that"?

your direct, non-disingenuous answer is; what? let's see if you go out as badly as AquaCityThey

 

[the cac mamba]

imagine taking the time to make this, because you're afraid to answer whether men who still have a penis should be allowed in women's sports

 

[AquaCityBoy]

imagine taking the time to make this, because you can't answer whether men who still have a penis should be allowed in women's sports

 

[the cac mamba]