So something can only be considered art if it’s legal?
Tagging does that, not graffiti in general. All tagging is graffiti but not all graffiti is tagging.99% is trash that destroys the beauty of the neighborhood
That's because it's done by black people. Racists always find a way to dismiss black people's art, it's disgusting.
Meanwhile Banksy who does literal gentrified graffiti is perceived as a high value artist.and is a millionaire. GTFOH.
Anti-black paintanti-black
Close your eyes, folks.
Picture in your mind your ideal neighborhood.
Maybe it has tree-lined streets.
Maybe a bike lane.
Maybe a tram line taking you to the shopping district.
Maybe you’re in a rural area with a lake nearby.
Maybe there’s an L-train passing through your block.
Ideally, is there graffiti anywhere?
No. There isn’t.
Next you'll call ancient wall paintings not art as technically they were graffiti.
That's because it's done by black people. Racists always find a way to dismiss black people's art, it's disgusting.
There is zero graffiti in your house.Cac.
anti-black
There is zero graffiti in your house.
Somehow you didn’t consider it real art to put on your walls.
I'm in NYC.There is zero graffiti in your house.
Somehow you didn’t consider it real art to put on your walls.
Art is how my fantasy football draft went this year.Very..
There's a cac from the 80's mainstream cacs love and have him as the face of graffiti..cacs shyt was all stick figures and not very appealing yet cacs still managed to elevate him.
Also, OP..Give us the defintion of ''Art''