went to 3 straight and should've won the first. There is nothing iverson really does better than zeke
Agreed and I'm an AI fan. Isiah could get a bucket whenever he wanted. And AI didnt have the handles or passing ability of Zeke either.
went to 3 straight and should've won the first. There is nothing iverson really does better than zeke
I disagreeiverson isn't quicker than isiah thomas
At that size (6'3" and below) it's between Iverson, Isiah, John Stockton, and Nate Archibald, it just depends on who you prefer. And I guess you could throw Bob Cousy in there, relative to era.
This needs to be a smiley
shut you old ass nikka.
Clearly better how? Because he shot way more? Do you even read the post you responded to. I could see if AI was more efficient at scoring or at least comparably efficient while taking more shots but that wasn't the case. I am not gonna give a guy the nod as being a better scorer just because he took way more shots. The difference is that AI didn't do shyt when he had talent. He had Stackhouse early on in Philly and they couldn't co-exist. He had Melo and other parts in Denver and they did nothing. He gets traded to Detroit and Denver goes right to the WCF and conversely the perennial contender Pistons go right into the toilet with him. This can't be overstated. AI was not as effective when the offense didn't revolve around him. Zeke had not problem in this area and could step up and score if it was needed. You put Zeke on those Denver squads and they are better and you put him on that Pistons team and they are better.
AI was that dude but Isaiah has two rings and went to three straight finals so he has to be put over him in the all time list. Plus he was a pure scorer like AI but he learned how to suppress that part of his game for the good of his team. Something Chuck never learned in well over a decade of playing.
You have no idea what youre talking about Because they're comparable when it comes to efficiency.
Isiah Thomas
45%FG/29%3Pt/76%FT
51%TS/46EFG. Which bad
Allen iverson
42%FG/31%/78%FT
51%TS/45%EFG which is bad
Yea There both on the same level. This isn't comparing Steve nash and Iverson here. AI is clearly the better scorer.
And the WCF in 09 is overblown because they only won 4 more games in a weaker year in the west were they eventually lost to the same team that iverson lost to in 2008. You said they would get better, is Isiah beating the lakers in 2001? Of the spurs in 07' or the lakers in 2008? No chance, as I said before zeke does no better in Iversons shoes. But put iverson on a much better and more talented version of the 01' scores like the bad boys were.....
I disagree
I dunno if there's anyone quicker than ai
Philly should have brought Zeke in as a mentor for Al if so.
nikka, whut!
zeke could never be a mentor to ai, publically.
as a matter of fact,...ai is a better model citizen than zeke, too.
zeke was cold, but ai was better than duke.
if ai was on a team coached by daley, and not made the fall guy for the low bball iq.
plus allowed to play his natural,..ai would have easily been one of the best pg's of all time.
you dudes need to do background on why chuck left philly.
then apply that same awful fo, to why ai had to play sg.
on top of never really being given a real supporting cast as well.
zeke was getting punched in the fukk'n eye and bloodied up by fukk'n paxson.
plus, used to hide behind his brother's muscle in the chi.
he was nowhere near as real as ai.
zeke is the original catholic school saved me kid.
all that oh, he was from out west...man, zeke was not hardbody.
his fukk'n brother was and he got away with that shyt, because of it.
art barr