Umar Johnson and Tariq Nasheed Beefing Update: Umar never had a psychology license

FLYINHAWAIIAN

Vegan For a Reason
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
16,101
Reputation
3,210
Daps
36,073
Reppin
Hawaii/Houston
I still havent seen the video that tariq was addressing with umar doing all that sniffing and talking about him being a DESCENDANNNNT!!!
:mjlol:
 

laughslikebig

Banned
Joined
Oct 24, 2017
Messages
1,559
Reputation
-770
Daps
4,772
Let me tell u what u just did wrong. U see what u did was assume. U assume I haven't done my research. I've actually spoke on this before in detail. But thats not what u did wrong. Someone made an incorrect statement about how its not possible for a Blackman to open a school for independent learning because the crackas wont allow it. I then corrected them. U come a week later making weak assumptions that have nothing to do with why I brought the school up in the first place. Whats wrong with this picture?

:snoop:
No nikka you didn't correct him.

The Honorable Elijah Muhammad was able to do everything he did, not as a black man but as a muslim. He didn't start a BLACK SCHOOL for BLACK BOYS. He opened Muslim Schools for MUSLIM KIDS who "happened to be black". He used religion as a guise.

There is a fundamental difference between that and what Umar was trying to do or the point son was trying to make. Your trying to break it down like this shyt complex it's not.

:yeshrug:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,457
Reputation
-564
Daps
15,340
Reppin
WestMidWest
Personal responsibility means nothing, if not complimented by societal responsibility, and vice versa

Regardless of how you feel about Umar, we all need to take more responsibility and pride in researching and comprehending, for our own benefits to avoid being easily manipulated by beehive mentality, media propaganda, and social pressures

@Bittasweet

1. Don’t jump the gun. If you’re a law school graduate who hasn’t yet passed the bar, you’re not a lawyer yet, so you can’t practice law. The definition of the “practice of law” is typically broad and varies from state to state. And—since it is a matter of law, not ethics—ABA Model Rule 5.5(a) merely prohibits a lawyer from practicing law in a jurisdiction where it would be prohibited. This means that you must look outside the ethics rules to track down whatever statutes, case law or court rules define and regulate the practice of law in your particular jurisdiction. For a directory of unlicensed practice of law committees and related resources, visit the ABA’s Client Protection home page.

2. Don’t refer to yourself as a “lawyer” or append “Esq.” to your name until you’ve successfully passed the bar. Falsely holding oneself out as a lawyer is among the activities that are generally found to constitute the unauthorized practice of law. You can generally indicate that you hold a J.D. degree—but only if it’s clear from the context that you are not attempting to hold yourself out as a lawyer. For example, while listing a J.D. degree on a resume is widely accepted, use of the credential in law firm marketing materials could be problematic absent a disclaimer that you have not yet passed the bar and are thus not licensed to practice law. So refrain from ordering business cards and letterhead until the positive bar results are in—only then are you a bona fide “lawyer.”

https://www.americanbar.org/content...ity/hanging_out_your_shingle.authcheckdam.pdf

you quoted a bunch of bullshyt about legal practice in australia and thought you was doing something :mjlol:
Where was all this researching before...whatever
4sXYSY.gif

baby-boy-dad-choke-o.gif

You dumb azz nikka, still thirsty for daps and ego strokes
You spent the entire day yesterday and this morning "researching" to save face, and this is what you came up with?
A PDF entitled Hanging out Your Shingle without Hanging Yourself out to Dry— 10 Quick and Easy Ethics Tips for New Lawyers
from the Center of Professional responsibility

How shameful is it for you to still be confused about being a lawyer and attorney and now to further expose yourself for being confused about ethical responsibility and professional requirements




Met with clients on January 3, 2018. Now shut the fukk up and leave the thread.

smh. In this context, I attended some of his lectures and workshops, so I'm a client too. I really have to explain to you the difference between a someone having clients for their private practice VS lectures and workshops?

How could you begin to criticize others for what they do/don't do, but don't have an understanding of what they actually do and try to use evidence against them that you don't comprehend


Bumpy Johnson was on that lecture tour screaming at black folk to BUILD BLACK FAMILIES! and stop treating our sista queens like hoes but trying to smash the damn promoter of the lecture and we got dusty mfs trying to make excuses for the prince of potato salad.
:childplease:

Side note: one of the main reasons why some of us never became religious was due to the perceived expectations of what it meant to be religious. The expectations usually aren't self-formulated, but instead we're taught and groomed by individuals we perceived to be have a clear understanding to the truth

A man is a man, and should be allowed to be a man, regardless of title. Many of us complain about the effeminatizing of men, especial Black men and boys, but then in Umar threads, complain that he's too aggressive, has too much bass in this voice, and is trying to get his dyck wet

Building a Black family is centered around the Black woman, not centered around whether you getting your dyck wet as a single man. If Umar was getting his dyck wet by non-Black woman, I still wouldn't be angry...until he commits to and have seeds with that non-Black women. Let that Black single male do him, while he continues to serve and sacrifice so much for Black people

On a grand scale, at what point do you have the personal responsibility to strengthen your reasoning and comprehension skills with a healthy mixture of reality and philosophy, so that you're able to self-formulate rational expectations and make conclusions that aren't void of facts, self-realization and vision OR dependent on other people's feelings/agenda/understanding


I see a lot of words but not the answer to my question, Jermaine.
What haven't I answered with that post? you don't know his clients context
Telling others how to live isn’t black empowerment. When you preach morality, expect the mirror to shine in your face. This is common sense to someone 43 years old.
lol. man trying to get poosay, he can't be talmbout Black empowerment

It took 3 posts to explain to you that a school psychologist needs to work in a school. The use of the term ‘liberal lunatic’ & ‘your kind’ Tells me all I need to know, though :mjpls:
There are kinds out there that needs to be awknowledge. Like you're clearly someone that doesn't understand past tense usage, the meaning of optional and mandatory actions and is comfortable with refererceing things you don't fully understand

It's already implied we are talking about black people.:comeon:
Hell no, we ain't talk Black people, unless you mention Black people and address Black people unique issues. FOH here with this variant of people of color includes Black people approach
 

JahBuhLun

Graphic Alchemist
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
5,958
Reputation
1,442
Daps
21,385
I'm surprised Jermaine hasn't called himself the Neo MLK. I bet Tariq will find a video where he claims to have inherited a vial of King's blood and injected it. If you thought this fraud was a threat to the system because he's against gays, look at how white people have done all the white homophobes in the last decade.

I could be wrong. Donate some more to find out.
Here's what you're overlooking, white people don't even need to attack white people directly anymore, Black people are more than willing to attack and discredit other Black people on the white man's behalf. It's always happened, and when the Black community is weakened or when a outspoken Black man is discredited and weakened, then they come in to finish the job. I know white people stay on code and I know if you're Black and speak out against homosexuality, you wont get far, you definitely wont get funding.

Like a said before, I have no shame in the fact that I donated $100 dollars one time, I've spent $1000s of dollars putting together care packages to feed the homeless as well, so donating for what I initially deemed a worthwhile cause is nothing to me. I also purchased 3 or Tariq's DVDs. I'm not going to slit my wrists because Umar is going to build or start a school, if he never intended on starting a school, that's something he has to reconcile with himself. I know that he had valid talking points, but he was flawed in other aspects of his life.
 

smokeurobinson

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
22,680
Reputation
4,820
Daps
61,742
No nikka you didn't correct him.

The Honorable Elijah Muhammad was able to do everything he did, not as a black man but as a muslim. He didn't start a BLACK SCHOOL for BLACK BOYS. He opened Muslim Schools for MUSLIM KIDS who "happened to be black". He used religion as a guise.

There is a fundamental difference between that and what Umar was trying to do or the point son was trying to make. Your trying to break it down like this shyt complex it's not.

:yeshrug:



I did correct him.


He said "what Umar wants in a school"

Well what the hell do u think is so different from what Umar wanted and what Elijah muhammad wanted? They both wanted to educate kids independent from the whitemans curriculum. I sideways pointed that out i post #1890

:snoop:


And here's the part where u really messed up. You stressing the make up of the school is irrelevant. Why? Because from what I recall, u dont have to be a member of the NOi to go to the UOI , U just have to pay the tuition,Tho most of the schools participants are members. The NOI was on the FBIs radar you really think the loop hole of religion had the government looking at the schools Elijah Muhammad built as anything outside of being 'Black?" Yeah , J Edgar Hoover was sidestepping their Blackness to let them do their religion thing.

:heh:
 
Last edited:

laughslikebig

Banned
Joined
Oct 24, 2017
Messages
1,559
Reputation
-770
Daps
4,772
I did correct him.


He said "what Umar wants in a school"

Well what the hell do u think is so different from what Umar wanted and what Elijah muhammad wanted? They both wanted to educate kids independent from the whitemans curriculum. I sideways pointed that out i post #1890

:snoop:


And here's the part where u really messed up. You stressing the make up of the school is irrelevant. Why? Because from what I recall, u dont have to be a member of the NOi to go to the UOI , U just have to pay the tuition,Tho most of the schools participants are members. The NOI was on the FBIs radar you really think the loop hole of religion had the government looking at the schools Elijah Muhammad built as anything outside of being 'Black?" Yeah , J Edgar Hoover was sidestepping their Blackness to let them do their religion thing.

:heh:

No I didnt think that. Neither did Elijah Muhammad... thats not the point. But he knew they only could attack a religion but so much.

This is common knowledge about his philosophy as a revolutionary. I was taught this by a nikka in the FOI. I should find this nikka on Facebook and ask him to sign up and explain this shyt to you.

They would not have made it as far as they have today, as just "a black group". They used Islam (religion) to shield their movement.

This a known fact. I'm not pulling this out my ass .

You cant compare that to what Umar was trying to do, because he was a singular man trying to undertake building a school. He didn't have the advantages that Elijah Muhammad had so it's not a fair comparison. Umar is not even from a group, like say a Garvey had the UNIA.

Umar is just a man with an idea, an idea that was way too big for him. Especially in the c00n era. So the comparison is not accurate.

But OKAY... I'll give you Elijah Muhammed. I'll say youre right and im wrong.

Your logic is still flawed...

Show another example... if what your saying is obtainable. Give another example.
 

smokeurobinson

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
22,680
Reputation
4,820
Daps
61,742
No I didnt think that. Neither did Elijah Muhammad... thats not the point. But he knew they only could attack a religion but so much.

This is common knowledge about his philosophy as a revolutionary. I was taught this by a nikka in the FOI. I should find this nikka on Facebook and ask him to sign up and explain this shyt to you.

They would not have made it as far as they have today, as just "a black group". They used Islam (religion) to shield their movement.

This a known fact. I'm not pulling this out my ass .

You cant compare that to what Umar was trying to do, because he was a singular man trying to undertake building a school. He didn't have the advantages that Elijah Muhammad had so it's not a fair comparison. Umar is not even from a group, like say a Garvey had the UNIA.

Umar is just a man with an idea, an idea that was way too big for him. Especially in the c00n era. So the comparison is not accurate.

But OKAY... I'll give you Elijah Muhammed. I'll say youre right and im wrong.

Your logic is still flawed...

Show another example... if what your saying is obtainable. Give another example.



:sas1:


You funny.

U do understand that the NOI would be considered more radical then Umar and here u are asking me to point out another Black man who tried to successfully build a school for Black kids after I gave an answer that the government would consider radical.

:heh:

You funny.



Magic Johnson, Jalen Rose, Oprah, Diddy, and Serena Williams have all been involved in opening schools so that removes the idea that Black people cant open schools. but if we talking about a school where there is an emphasis on " being Black" like seriously.....Thats some "from the left" rare type shyt. I gave u Elijah Muhammad and u ask for another name in a rare category. You funny. Only other answer I can give is the school WEUSI SHULE translated "Black school" in Swahili MC Lyte was speaking on the song HEAL that closed down but was an outlet that had an emphasis on being Black.
 
Last edited:

jackson35

Banned
Joined
Jun 26, 2015
Messages
6,750
Reputation
-2,338
Daps
6,426


I guess he didn't listen. Hell even dropped a film 1804 that white supremacist are mad about.

Get yo troll ass on.



I guess he didn't listen. Hell even dropped a film 1804 that white supremacist are mad about.

Get yo troll ass on.
mother fukker, that information been floating out there since the 70's that info aint new. plus he didn't touch on any shyt that made cacs really scared and leave the island alone for a while
 

No Sleep

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
14,832
Reputation
3,725
Daps
35,914
Reppin
Souf Caro
mother fukker, that information been floating out there since the 70's that info aint new. plus he didn't touch on any shyt that made cacs really scared and leave the island alone for a while
Lol, if you don't care about neggs why you PM me?

Who said it hasn't been around? You said Tariq don't talk about WS no more after the FBI visit. I proved to you that he still does and even got on Fox News and did it.
 
Top