FLYINHAWAIIAN
Vegan For a Reason
I still havent seen the video that tariq was addressing with umar doing all that sniffing and talking about him being a DESCENDANNNNT!!!
No nikka you didn't correct him.Let me tell u what u just did wrong. U see what u did was assume. U assume I haven't done my research. I've actually spoke on this before in detail. But thats not what u did wrong. Someone made an incorrect statement about how its not possible for a Blackman to open a school for independent learning because the crackas wont allow it. I then corrected them. U come a week later making weak assumptions that have nothing to do with why I brought the school up in the first place. Whats wrong with this picture?
Where was all this researching before...whatever@Bittasweet
1. Don’t jump the gun. If you’re a law school graduate who hasn’t yet passed the bar, you’re not a lawyer yet, so you can’t practice law. The definition of the “practice of law” is typically broad and varies from state to state. And—since it is a matter of law, not ethics—ABA Model Rule 5.5(a) merely prohibits a lawyer from practicing law in a jurisdiction where it would be prohibited. This means that you must look outside the ethics rules to track down whatever statutes, case law or court rules define and regulate the practice of law in your particular jurisdiction. For a directory of unlicensed practice of law committees and related resources, visit the ABA’s Client Protection home page.
2. Don’t refer to yourself as a “lawyer” or append “Esq.” to your name until you’ve successfully passed the bar. Falsely holding oneself out as a lawyer is among the activities that are generally found to constitute the unauthorized practice of law. You can generally indicate that you hold a J.D. degree—but only if it’s clear from the context that you are not attempting to hold yourself out as a lawyer. For example, while listing a J.D. degree on a resume is widely accepted, use of the credential in law firm marketing materials could be problematic absent a disclaimer that you have not yet passed the bar and are thus not licensed to practice law. So refrain from ordering business cards and letterhead until the positive bar results are in—only then are you a bona fide “lawyer.”
https://www.americanbar.org/content...ity/hanging_out_your_shingle.authcheckdam.pdf
you quoted a bunch of bullshyt about legal practice in australia and thought you was doing something
Met with clients on January 3, 2018. Now shut the fukk up and leave the thread.
Bumpy Johnson was on that lecture tour screaming at black folk to BUILD BLACK FAMILIES! and stop treating our sista queens like hoes but trying to smash the damn promoter of the lecture and we got dusty mfs trying to make excuses for the prince of potato salad.
What haven't I answered with that post? you don't know his clients contextI see a lot of words but not the answer to my question, Jermaine.
lol. man trying to get poosay, he can't be talmbout Black empowermentTelling others how to live isn’t black empowerment. When you preach morality, expect the mirror to shine in your face. This is common sense to someone 43 years old.
There are kinds out there that needs to be awknowledge. Like you're clearly someone that doesn't understand past tense usage, the meaning of optional and mandatory actions and is comfortable with refererceing things you don't fully understandIt took 3 posts to explain to you that a school psychologist needs to work in a school. The use of the term ‘liberal lunatic’ & ‘your kind’ Tells me all I need to know, though
Hell no, we ain't talk Black people, unless you mention Black people and address Black people unique issues. FOH here with this variant of people of color includes Black people approachIt's already implied we are talking about black people.
Here's what you're overlooking, white people don't even need to attack white people directly anymore, Black people are more than willing to attack and discredit other Black people on the white man's behalf. It's always happened, and when the Black community is weakened or when a outspoken Black man is discredited and weakened, then they come in to finish the job. I know white people stay on code and I know if you're Black and speak out against homosexuality, you wont get far, you definitely wont get funding.I'm surprised Jermaine hasn't called himself the Neo MLK. I bet Tariq will find a video where he claims to have inherited a vial of King's blood and injected it. If you thought this fraud was a threat to the system because he's against gays, look at how white people have done all the white homophobes in the last decade.
I could be wrong. Donate some more to find out.
No nikka you didn't correct him.
The Honorable Elijah Muhammad was able to do everything he did, not as a black man but as a muslim. He didn't start a BLACK SCHOOL for BLACK BOYS. He opened Muslim Schools for MUSLIM KIDS who "happened to be black". He used religion as a guise.
There is a fundamental difference between that and what Umar was trying to do or the point son was trying to make. Your trying to break it down like this shyt complex it's not.
that's what fbi made tariq do= attack black folk not white supremacy. nice try.
Met with clients on January 3, 2018. Now shut the fukk up and leave the thread.
:deadkoolaid:Look like he finally giving directions to his school
I did correct him.
He said "what Umar wants in a school"
Well what the hell do u think is so different from what Umar wanted and what Elijah muhammad wanted? They both wanted to educate kids independent from the whitemans curriculum. I sideways pointed that out i post #1890
And here's the part where u really messed up. You stressing the make up of the school is irrelevant. Why? Because from what I recall, u dont have to be a member of the NOi to go to the UOI , U just have to pay the tuition,Tho most of the schools participants are members. The NOI was on the FBIs radar you really think the loop hole of religion had the government looking at the schools Elijah Muhammad built as anything outside of being 'Black?" Yeah , J Edgar Hoover was sidestepping their Blackness to let them do their religion thing.
that's what fbi made tariq do= attack black folk not white supremacy. nice try.
No I didnt think that. Neither did Elijah Muhammad... thats not the point. But he knew they only could attack a religion but so much.
This is common knowledge about his philosophy as a revolutionary. I was taught this by a nikka in the FOI. I should find this nikka on Facebook and ask him to sign up and explain this shyt to you.
They would not have made it as far as they have today, as just "a black group". They used Islam (religion) to shield their movement.
This a known fact. I'm not pulling this out my ass .
You cant compare that to what Umar was trying to do, because he was a singular man trying to undertake building a school. He didn't have the advantages that Elijah Muhammad had so it's not a fair comparison. Umar is not even from a group, like say a Garvey had the UNIA.
Umar is just a man with an idea, an idea that was way too big for him. Especially in the c00n era. So the comparison is not accurate.
But OKAY... I'll give you Elijah Muhammed. I'll say youre right and im wrong.
Your logic is still flawed...
Show another example... if what your saying is obtainable. Give another example.
I guess he didn't listen. Hell even dropped a film 1804 that white supremacist are mad about.
Get yo troll ass on.
mother fukker, that information been floating out there since the 70's that info aint new. plus he didn't touch on any shyt that made cacs really scared and leave the island alone for a while
I guess he didn't listen. Hell even dropped a film 1804 that white supremacist are mad about.
Get yo troll ass on.
Lol, if you don't care about neggs why you PM me?mother fukker, that information been floating out there since the 70's that info aint new. plus he didn't touch on any shyt that made cacs really scared and leave the island alone for a while