UGANDA..THE RETURN (Indian related)

[theworldismine13]

Well they invaded the land a la the British and exploited the resources, installed corrupt leaders, and lorded over the country a la the British. Skills and education are irrelevant. We are talking about resources, power, politics, ethnicity, etc. You should care more about this as it involves black people, but I remember you are not problack.

if problack means giving black people bad economic advice and clinging to some outdated marxist philosophies then im most definitely not pro black, i believe in economic freedom and individual freedom, i consider that to be pro black and unlike you i dont go around giving black bad economic advice cuz the reality is that when the indians left it did not make an iota of positive difference to the black population

i dont know what it is you are reading, where exactly does it say that indains invaded the land like the british, exploited resources and installed corrupt leaders and lorded over the country?

the problem with kicking out indians is that it shows a disrespect for the rule of law, and rule of law is key in developing a country, if indians were violating the individual and economic rights of blacks then the government should have punished the perpetrators under the law, but overall uganda won nothing by kicking the indians out because it went against economic freedom, individual freedom and against the rule of law, the basic things uganda needs to develop

 

[godkiller]

if problack means giving black people bad economic advice and clinging to some outdated marxist philosophies then im most definitely not pro black, i believe in economic freedom and individual freedom, i consider that to be pro black and unlike you i dont go around giving black bad economic advice cuz the reality is that when the indians left it did not make an iota of positive difference to the black population

I do not put economic and individual freedom over black sovereignty and economic rights. At base, few countries and peoples do, and especially not Asian countries. Sovereignty and economic rights are not mutually exclusive from economic success with a degree of economic and individual freedom. Japan combines both these values and does better than 95% of the world. I look down on scum libertarians like you. The facts don't support your argument that Uganda suffered for expelling foreigners, yet here you are making it anyway.

Uganda's GDP in 1972 was a meagre 1.491 billion USD. The next year, in 1973, Uganda's GDP rose to 1.702 billion USD. The country's GDP has been rising ever since. Today it is 19.88 billion USD. This growth trend mirrors Uganda's human development index score too. So, contrary to your assertions, Uganda has actually improved in the time since Idi Amin took power and without cacs, indians, etc. The facts rail against your biased psuedo economic philosophy bullshyt.

the problem with kicking out indians is that it shows a disrespect for the rule of law, and rule of law is key in developing a country, if indians were violating the individual and economic rights of blacks then the government should have punished the perpetrators under the law, but overall uganda won nothing by kicking the indians out because it went against economic freedom, individual freedom and against the rule of law, the basic things uganda needs to develop

1. Laws are created by the government so no laws were broken.

2. Uganda has continuously grown since the 1970s. The people now are better off than they were in the 1970s.

 

[GetInTheTruck]

India is a cesspool.

"my shythole is better than your shythole"

 

[Micky Mikey]

does anyone find it disturbing that where ever blacks are, they never own the wealth in their communities. its quite sad.

 

[Batman]

"my shythole is better than your shythole"

You mean Canada right? Or Jamaica? At least it's a tourist attraction. At least nikkas don't scare off the white women by masturbating to them in public.

 

[GetInTheTruck]

You mean Canada right? Or Jamaica? At least it's a tourist attraction. At least nikkas don't scare off the white women by masturbating to them in public.

India isn't a tourist attraction? People go to Jamaica for the weather and the scenery, and there's nothing wrong with that. People from all over the world go to India for that and to see a civilization with 6000 years of history and one of the oldest and richest cultures on the planet still in existence. You don't have to be a fan, but those are the facts. There's no comparison.

Anyway I'm in India now and see white people all the time, visited the Indian Institute of Technology where my uncle teaches and has lots of European students. Got some medical work done and went to the dentist out here because Indian medical facilities/care is top notch and relatively cheap. Yeah a real cess pool

 

[Batman]

I agree with you, India is great.

As long as you aren't Dalit.

 

[theworldismine13]

I do not put economic and individual freedom over black sovereignty and economic rights.

black sovereignty was never under threat that is why kicking out the indians is problematic

and if "black sovereignty" is being used by a person like idi amin to cover up the violation of the individual rights of black people then its very problematic

the whole purpose of black sovereignty IMO is to protect the economic rights and individual rights of black people and there isnt any evidence that economic rights and individual rights of black people increased by kicking out indians

At base, few countries and peoples do, and especially not Asian countries.

countries can do whatever they want but im not aware of any country asian or otherwise that has moved forward without emphasizing economic rights

Sovereignty and economic rights are not mutually exclusive from economic success with a degree of economic and individual freedom.

i have no idea what this sentence means

Japan combines both these values and does better than 95% of the world. I look down on scum libertarians like you.

well lets unpack this, japan has moved forward economically by emphasizing economic rights, they havent moved forward because of "japanese sovereignty" "sovereignty" has nothing to do with economic success, you can have economic success with or without "sovereignty"

by sovereignty im assuming you mean treating minorities like shyt

the examples of uganda is a perfect example of that, they got "sovereignty" but not economic rights, ugandans did not gain any economic rights by kicking out indians

The facts don't support your argument that Uganda suffered for expelling foreigners, yet here you are making it anyway.

Uganda's GDP in 1972 was a meagre 1.491 billion USD. The next year, in 1973, Uganda's GDP rose to 1.702 billion USD. The country's GDP has been rising ever since. Today it is 19.88 billion USD. This growth trend mirrors Uganda's human development index score too. So, contrary to your assertions, Uganda has actually improved in the time since Idi Amin took power and without cacs, hindis, etc. The facts rail against your biased psuedo economic philosophy bullshyt.

are you serious, are you trying to hype up the ugandan economy? the ugandan economy is one of the worst in the world, increases in GDP is more attributable to a rise in population then anything else

im not even saying that the economy got worse, my point is that it didnt make any difference, ugandans did not get more economic rights and/or economic benefits from kicking out the indians, but they did get a lack of respect for the rule of law and dictators

as far as the numbers you are spitting out, you're an idiot, you cant just look at numbers without some kind of comparison, especially GDP which naturally increases no matter what, every country in existence has grown their GDP since 1973

in this case the best comparison would be kenya, which also had indians, the kenyan GDP is 38 billion, double the size of uganda, and even if you take into account kenya's bigger population the GNP is still higher for kenya

so basically there is zero evidence that uganda benefited from kicking out indians, you can spit ll the so called pro black shyt all you want but there is zero evidence to support the notion that uganda benefited by kicking out indians

The government creates the law and the government can virtually do whatever it wants within a country. Why you think it was illegal to do what was done when the government did it is beyond me.

of course the government can do whatever it wants, that is why the rule of law and individual freedom is important, to stop the government from terrorizing the population the way idi amin terrorized ugandans,

are you that delusional that you think the violation of individual rights and the lack of respect for the rule of law idi amin showed stopped with the indians?

 

[theworldismine13]

does anyone find it disturbing that where ever blacks are, they never own the wealth in their communities. its quite sad.

not really, because that isnt the real problem, that is just a symptom, the real problem is the lack of skills and the lack of education in the black communities

 

[Kritic]

first of all let me begin by saying i respect the indian hustle worldwide. the indians i've encountered in teh past and present don't fuq around. i personally stunt on them but indians were some of the brightest students in class. and some of the best in whatever professions the are in.

i've been to uganda. i've passed through a few african countries and they were all disappointing. only uganda stood out to me. uganda was the first country which i saw black ppl own sh1t. rather own most sh1t than any other african country. i was surprised at uganda cause we were just passing through and i'd never really cared for it until i stepped foot there.
idi amin did the right thing kickin them niccas out of there cause in all other countries indians ran them and the local africans were pretty much reduced to labor/slaves. corruption is so high in africa that indians take advantage of their immigration systems and bring in their own ppl from india to hold top positions and the immigration ppl don't really give a sh1t so long as they get paid.

@theworldismine13 stfu you don't know whatt the hell you're talkin about. you're a broken record repeating the same bullsh1t.

 

[theworldismine13]

first of all let me begin by saying i respect the indian hustle worldwide. the indians i've encountered in teh past and present don't fuq around. i personally stunt on them but indians were some of the brightest students in class. and some of the best in whatever professions the are in.

i've been to uganda. i've passed through a few african countries and they were all disappointing. only uganda stood out to me. uganda was the first country which i saw black ppl own sh1t. rather own most sh1t than any other african country. i was surprised at uganda cause we were just passing through and i'd never really cared for it until i stepped foot there.
idi amin did the right thing kickin them niccas out of there cause in all other countries indians ran them and the local africans were pretty much reduced to labor/slaves. corruption is so high in africa that indians take advantage of their immigration systems and bring in their own ppl from india to hold top positions and the immigration ppl don't really give a sh1t so long as they get paid.

@theworldismine13 stfu you don't know whatt the hell you're talkin about. you're a broken record repeating the same bullsh1t.

For some reason I don't think you've been to Uganda

And This whole notion of trying to hype up the Ugandan economy is idiotic, Uganda has one of the worst economies on the planet and an awful political system

And like anywhere else, economic prosperity is a function of skills and education and the government's role is to follow the rule of law and to protect economic freedom and individual freedom

It's disgusting watching people give awful economic advice under the guise of pro blackness

 

[Kritic]

For some reason I don't think you've been to Uganda

And This whole notion of trying to hype up the Ugandan economy is idiotic, Uganda has one of the worst economies on the planet and an awful political system

And like anywhere else, economic prosperity is a function of skills and education and the government's role is to follow the rule of law and to protect economic freedom and individual freedom

It's disgusting watching people give awful economic advice under the guise of pro blackness

nah i can name drop places in kampala, arusha, mombasa, dar es salaam that only real africans would catch while you're over there talkin nonsense from cia worldbook. uganda is doing a lot better that what is portrayed. barack admininstration got you thinking their biggest problem is "individual gay rights" problem same as libyan ppl had problem with individual rights too right?

you ppl are so gullible and stupid.. you fall for this individual rights freedom bullsh1t all the time.


what country they have you thinking has individual rights and economic problems now?

 

[theworldismine13]

nah i can name drop places in kampala, arusha, mombasa, dar es salaam that only real africans would catch while you're over there talkin nonsense from cia worldbook. uganda is doing a lot better that what is portrayed. barack admininstration got you thinking their biggest problem is "individual gay rights" problem same as libyan ppl had problem with individual rights too right?

you ppl are so gullible and stupid.. you fall for this individual rights freedom bullsh1t all the time.


what country they have you thinking has individual and economic problems now?

Uganda and the whole of east africa is doing better today but overall Uganda's economy and political system is awful by any objective measurement but that isnt even the real issue

The point I'm making is that Ugandans did not gain anything by kicking out Indians, and it was a violation of the rule of law the way it was done

The fact that y'all are trying to hype up the Uganda economy and defending a crazy dictator is all the evidence you need that you are full of shyt