UBISOFT: Watch Dogs 900p on ps4/ 792p on Xbox 1,Both 30fps

[Stinky Diver]

Think I'll end up getting this on PC. My 580, 2500k and 12gb of ram should be good for 1080p at decent settings.

 

[Canon]

It's amazing how fast this game fell apart

oh well i'll just wait till the PS+ version or a heavy discount

 

[MeachTheMonster]

If I just wanted "good games", I have literally thousands to choose from right now that I've never played/beat. I want good games that look as great as possible when I spend that much money on someething like a game console. And on top of that, HD has been around for about a decade now. I'm no game developer, but everything that's going on from these graphics, to frame rate, to dlc & microtransactions is straight up lazy from my view

Nah it's not lazy. And the games do look good.

If they're weren't endless posts/stories on the issue no one would care. I never knew the resolution of any of the games I played last gen, and I was never disappointed

 

[Lord Beasley]

my fux given meter just bottomed out. i officially have no interest in this game

 

[CTech83]

Originally pre-ordered the PS4 version, but i'm going PC with this one.

 

[-DMP-]

900p, is that?

-DMP-

 

[thaKEAF]

First day cop I ain't one of these geeks on neofag that obsesses over frames per second

 

[Kingshango]

PC it is then.

 

[Brandeezy]

We are 6 months+ into "nextgen"... what was the point of these new consoles if they still have these BS limitations? Shouldn't everything run at 1080p/60fps by now? Especially for $400/$500 + $60 for the games?

This. Are studios getting pressured to release unfinished games or some shyt

This nikkas had an extra 5 months to work on this shyt and they can't even deliver 1080p/60fps

 

[B86]

Nah it's not lazy. And the games do look good.

If they're weren't endless posts/stories on the issue no one would care. I never knew the resolution of any of the games I played last gen, and I was never disappointed

You aren't wrong at all, but unfortunately the average person/gamer know a little about games/technology now and would like to justify what they payed half-a-stack for

 

[AkaDemiK]

nikkas are more worried about 1080 than the 30 fps....that shyt is terrible for an open world game with mad shyt going on....all that shyt tells me is that it;s going to dip below 30 when a lot of fukkery is going on...

 

[Da King]

went from day 1 to bargain bin status for me


sorry, but after playing Infamous I'm not settling for less in res and Watch Dogs looks :fif: so there really no excuse. I also highly doubt the FPS is locked at 30 anyway. AC4 was beautiful at 1080p, not about to go back to PS3 days

 

[MeachTheMonster]

went from day 1 to bargain bin status for me


sorry, but after playing Infamous I'm not settling for less in res and Watch Dogs looks :fif: so there really no excuse. I also highly doubt the FPS is locked at 30 anyway. AC4 was beautiful at 1080p, not about to go back to PS3 days

you do realize that resolution isn't the only indicator of "better graphics"?

Previews have already said this game looks better than assassins creed, and not one journalist was able to call out the fact that the game wasn't native 1080p.

Y'all are really overreacting about theirs resolution stuff.

 

[Lord Beasley]

what's more troubling is the xthotOne gets exposed every week. the mediabox flips a lousy 792p, where is the cloud in all this? does "snapping" really make up for this?

 

[Da King]

you do realize that resolution isn't the only indicator of "better graphics"?

Previews have already said this game looks better than assassins creed, and not one journalist was able to call out the fact that the game wasn't native 1080p.

Y'all are really overreacting about theirs resolution stuff.

if you not going to hit 1080p don't come with 30FPS and reports say that it's not even locked based on the demos, that shyt is PS3 era, period