Uber CEO Backs Trump, #DeleteUber movement starts, Lyft donating $1M over the next 4 years to ACLU

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
52,377
Reputation
19,251
Daps
285,551
Stupid fukking cac fakkit nothing I said was fukking racist, if that stop-and-frisk policy was implemented no one will give a peep to be against it. Only black people will be out their protesting along with so-called black leaders. Your white liberal friend will be scarce, a few might show up, but not in droves like his other policies
I guess I just dreamed those large protests in NY and LA last year about police brutality huh.
 

Macallik86

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
6,642
Reputation
1,483
Daps
21,663
Stupid fukking cac fakkit nothing I said was fukking racist, if that stop-and-frisk policy was implemented no one will give a peep to be against it. Only black people will be out their protesting along with so-called black leaders. Your white liberal friend will be scarce, a few might show up, but not in droves like his other policies
Sorry bro. I'm black and straight. The point is that most (all?) of the people affected by Trump's immigration ban are people of color. The countries that are affected are full of black and brown people. But people like you see thousand of people unite around the disadvantaged and your negative Nancy ass wants to try and start a race argument and race bait. fukk outta here.

White people were not victims of stop-and-frisk in NY. They over-whelming targeted blacks and latinos. SNF IS code-speach to search the nikkas without probsble cause
I agree with this.
 

Ms. Elaine

Spoiled Brat
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
6,206
Reputation
-4,340
Daps
10,770
Reppin
Avocado Toast
Stupid bytch couldn't even come with a comeback with any substance except for ad-homenem :russ:
Favorite new term for the smart dumb nikka...Ad hominem. :mjpls:

Almost always used INCORRECTLY (or in its most basic and superficial form) and/or MISSPELLED. :lolbron:


When you construct a well-informed and logically sound argument, then maybe I'll take the time and write a thoughtful response

You brain-dead bytch nikka. :heh:
 

Swirv

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 1, 2012
Messages
17,193
Reputation
2,901
Daps
54,172
bitTop96x96.png

bitBottom96x96.png


Dear,
At Uber we've always believed in standing up for what's right. Today we need your help supporting drivers who may be impacted by President Trump's new immigration ban.

Drivers who are citizens of Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria or Yemen and live in the US but have left the country, will not be able to return for 90 days. This means they won't be able to earn money and support their families during this period.

It's important that as a community we do everything we can to help these drivers. Here's what Uber will do:
• Provide 24/7 legal supportfor drivers who are trying to get back into the country. Our lawyers and immigration experts will be on call 24/7 to help.
Compensate drivers for their lost earnings. This will help them support their families and put food on the table while they are banned from the US.
Urge the government to reinstate the right of US residents to travel—whatever their country of origin—immediately.
• Create a $3 million legal defense fund to help drivers with immigration and translation services.
If you are a driver or a friend or family member of someone who has been affected, please contact us here.

Uber is a community. We're here to support each other. Please help Uber to help drivers who may be affected by this unjust and wrong immigration ban.
Travis
Uber Founder & CEO

open.aspx
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,457
Reputation
-564
Daps
15,342
Reppin
WestMidWest
What are you talking about? Where in that post does it say anything about Uber creating taxis? It doesn't. I talk about ridesharing. And yes Uber did created a large MARKET for it. A market is not the same thing as a product or sevice. That MARKET is built upon people using their vehicles to create a side income. Everyone knows this.
It is also known that Uber and Lyft would eventually move to automated cars. So it was NEVER meant to be a permanent market for its contractors. NEVER.
Go do that sound bite picky choosey fake outrage shyt somewhere else. Don't try to piggyback off my post to post your nonsense.
The only fake outrage is you replying to my original post with incorrect information, trying to fish for daps and be dismissive in order to defend a nonsensical boycott and protest of a perceived action of one company, so to circle-jerk and stan for its competitor. All while ignoring their combined negative impact on US employment

Uber provides limo/taxi/pooling car service. Not ridersharing

the term "ridesharing" corresponds to a driver picking up folks along a route that he was going anyway to save gas, money, car emission or just looking out
VS
a passenger, using a network system to request a driver to pick them up, then take them to a destination of their choosing

To use the word "ridesharing" to discribe Uber/Lyft or any other similar car service is not only wrong, but such oversimplification provides a glimpse into your nonchalant attitude towards facts and context

If you don't know this fundamental difference, then how do you feel comfortable saying "everyone knows this"?

How could Uber have plans for autnomous cars when Uber came out in '08/'09, before and during which DARPA competitions were occurring that had many of the autonomous cars not being able to finish the routes. "Everyone knows this" but you

Why did it take Uber only to recently to partner with CMU to start the next round of research for autonomous cars? because only recently, has the technology advanced to the point where the government would entertain legislation to compliment the next round of research
 

Benjamin Sisko

Still that resident truth-bringer
Supporter
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
23,572
Reputation
5,565
Daps
90,295
Reppin
NO
Favorite new term for the smart dumb nikka...Ad hominem. :mjpls:

Almost always used INCORRECTLY (or in its most basic and superficial form) and/or MISSPELLED. :lolbron:


When you construct a well-informed and logically sound argument, then maybe I'll take the time and write a thoughtful response

You brain-dead bytch nikka. :heh:
This bytch is arguing in circles to prevent from directly creating a decent rebuttal to my original post and then flips the script on me on why SHE/HE originally quoted ME and didn't even try to deconstruct my argument :mjlol:

This is what TLR has come to in debating?? Quoting people and calling them dumbasses instead of deconstructing their argument?? :laff:

Yeah, yo momma needed to get stoned for birthing an idiot :hhh:
 

Benjamin Sisko

Still that resident truth-bringer
Supporter
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
23,572
Reputation
5,565
Daps
90,295
Reppin
NO
Sorry bro. I'm black and straight. The point is that most (all?) of the people affected by Trump's immigration ban are people of color. The countries that are affected are full of black and brown people. But people like you see thousand of people unite around the disadvantaged and your negative Nancy ass wants to try and start a race argument and race bait. fukk outta here.
.
Dumb ass that wasn't the point of my post. The point was that when a policy is affecting mostly black Americans, like s nationwide stop and frisk, the same people up in arms over the Muslim ban will be giving all types of excuses to say why the policy is NEEDED. Like black-on-black crime and Chicago. Stop moving goal-posts and stay on topic.
 
Top