Tyrese complaining (again) about paying $10,000 monthly in child support.

Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
15,224
Reputation
4,092
Daps
60,869
If she needs that much...I'd just push for full custody. Let me raise me raise my child solo lol.

Problem for famous brehs is you never know when a broad really loves you versus when she's just looking to hit a lick. Then...famous nikkas mess around on wifey so ol girl has all the proof she needs to get half
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2015
Messages
15,508
Reputation
2,136
Daps
58,251



Tyrese Gibson is looking to get a new judge in his divorce case with his ex, Samantha Lee Gibson.

Following a heated exchange during two courtroom hearings in late August -- in which Tyrese was ordered to pay $10,690 per month in child support for the former couple's 3-year-old daughter, Soraya -- the actor filed a petition in Fulton County Superior Court in Georgia, seeking the recusal of Judge Kevin M. Farmer.

According to the court docs filed on Tuesday, which were obtained by ET, Tyrese lays out a multitude of reasons he believes Judge Farmer was biased against him during the hearings.

In the motion for recusal, Tyrese's attorneys allege that, at a pre-trial hearing in his chambers, Judge Farmer "stated that he already has reviewed the financial evidence in the case" and that $10,690 was "an appropriate amount" for the actor to pay. The motion suggests that Judge Farmer had already made up his mind on the matter before hearing anything that would be presented in court.

There were also many moments during the trial that Tyrese feels demonstrated the judge's alleged bias.

When Tyrese testified on Aug. 29 that "he has a CPA to manage his finances, and that he did not know anything about his finances, Judge Farmer stated from the bench that self-employed people manipulate their taxes suggesting that [Tyrese] did not properly report his taxes," the motion claims, adding, "When counsel for [Tyrese] stated that [Tyrese] would have his CPA fly in from California for the second day of trail, Judge Farmer would not allow it and just walked off the bench."

During a contentious day in court on Aug. 30 -- during which time Tyrese took the stand and was repeatedly interrupted by Judge Farmer while testifying, as seen in video of the court hearing -- the actor's motion claims that Judge Farmer "said that counsel for [Tyrese] needed to 'put a foot on her client's neck.'"



tyrese-gibson-ving-rhames.gif

I don’t give a fukk about the rest of this but that spoiler is elite posting :russ:
 

TELL ME YA CHEESIN FAM?

I walk around a little edgy already
Joined
Jul 1, 2012
Messages
48,213
Reputation
2,614
Daps
125,899
Reppin
The H
I mean dude is right. $120k yearly for 18 years.

I really do hope that money didn't go to waste and the kid has something to show for it because the mother spent that money wisely, right?
How much you think Tyrese makes annually?
 

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
80,023
Reputation
24,351
Daps
362,257
When Tyrese testified on Aug. 29 that "he has a CPA to manage his finances, and that he did not know anything about his finances, Judge Farmer stated from the bench that self-employed people manipulate their taxes suggesting that [Tyrese] did not properly report his taxes," the motion claims, adding, "When counsel for [Tyrese] stated that [Tyrese] would have his CPA fly in from California for the second day of trail, Judge Farmer would not allow it and just walked off the bench."
:gucci:
 

TRUEST

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
14,529
Reputation
2,736
Daps
55,212
Reppin
NULL
if you rich you gotta stop simpin and stop getting these women pregnant... :francis: just stop and think...
It’s called presence of mind. When the gaze of a devilishly charming seductress is cast upon men, it disarms the loosely fastened. Not every man has the mental fortitude to weigh the pros and cons.
 
Last edited:

L&HH

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
53,212
Reputation
5,810
Daps
161,617
Reppin
PG x MD
That ain’t just CA, breh. It’s the whole country. That shyt should not be based on income. It should be based on a realistic amount that it takes to financially provide for a child
Yeah but inherently has to be income based because of the low end of the spectrum. Let’s say you establish that it takes $2k a month to take care of a child. So do the people that make $60k a year and less have to pay $2k a month as well? So then you’re going to have to make adjustments for them based on income.

Also part of the reasoning judges make higher earners pay so much is there is a precedent that a child should have a similar standard of living in both homes. I think $10k a month is pretty light for Tyrese. Dude did a video years ago with transformers in his backyard. He’ll be alright. His ex doesn’t have to work with that amount but it’s not like she’s going to be living in luxury. His daughter is 15 so only 3 more years.

 
Last edited:

maxamusa

Veteran
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
25,624
Reputation
6,393
Daps
63,668
Reppin
Old York
Cot damn that was disrespectful.

"Baby momma #1" like its some sort of game show :mjlol:

All you do is nothing; with your collection plate out (quickly realizes how he sounds) ummm umm besides take care of "the kid" :picard:
 
Top