actually those facts described in that manner are not common sense. if they were more people of color would use said argument. most black folks do not know to say, their were more of us then whites back then for free labor purposes to line the pockets of the white man. now their are more people of color for the very same person, to line the pockets of the white man.
it's the very reason young Bush as president wasn't trying to kick all the illegals out. he knew being their in texas that they wanted and needed those latins, legal or illegal to provide that labor that they do not want to do. all Facts. but most people that are not scholars or not well read in race and society do not know how to put those two things together to make that parallel.
The fukk are you trying to say here? You're clearly not a scholar. You can't even articulate yourself clearly.
You don't have to be white or need white man accredited credentials in education to know that this country allowing non white immigrants in doesn't disprove the existence of white supremacy. That's common sense even tho the average person is an idiot and common sense isn't common.
You act like you're saying something that hasn't been said on this site a thousand times. Again, this guy did a good job but he left some shyt on the table too. He never mentioned the fact that white supremacy is a global system that dominates the entire world. All non whites are under the control of white supremacy to one extent or the other. Many non whites "clamor" to come to Amerikkka because white supremacists have raped/pillaged their home countries and most of the resources/wealth that whites have accumulated from raping non white countries is concentrated in white countries, Amerikkka especially. No shyt they want to come here. That's a good point that he could've made on top of his common sense point that white supremacy us about power and not numbers.
My point remains. The premise of this thread is c00n shyt and you posters who leaped to cosign it should check yourselves. You really didn't even address my point which was acknowledging the difference in how Tucker conducted this interview vs the Nasheed interviews. This thread makes the unnecessary comparison while being dishonest about the comparison.
The lesson to be learned here is the same as the lesson from Nasheed's interviews. White supremacists don't care about the truth or logic. They're completely irrational and illogical and you can't reason or "debate" with them. Thi guy didn't get Tucker to concede or acknowledge anything that he said. He was just allowed to make his points without being trolled unlike Nasheed
@ denying Italian immigrants being treated like shyt 100 years ago
@ the Tariq stans catching feelings for their hero
I'm watching this right now & I agree. Dude is making the same points I've heard Tariq make a million time before. The only difference I gotta agree with is that dude definitely is more polished than Tariq, but at the same time Tucker is not trolling him as hard as he did Tariq.
I guess u didnt see Tucker attempt to overtalk him during that exchange. The professor spoke with conviction nd confidence..behind his talking points so there was no need for him to become rattled unlike ur man Tariq.
