had that fakkit flustered, he resorted to plain old insults and nervous laughing at the end 
Tucker Carlson Gets OWNED On White Supremacy By UConn Professor (>>Tariq)
- Thread starter LogicFirst
- Start date
good video.
People are exposing themselves. Tucker was much more professional and respectful here. He didn't start this exchange off by insulting this guy and lying about something that he said. He also allowed this man to speak without interruption. This segment is almost twice as long as Nasheed's and half of Nasheed's segment was wasted arguing over semantics. Tucker trolled and made it personal both times with Nasheed. He didn't do any of that here until the very end after he had been sonned.
This was a good but he didn't say anything that hasn't been said on this site. I've personally made damn near all of them myself here. This really had nothing to do with academics. He arguments were common sense.
Y'all low key on some white(looking) man ice colder shyt.
This was a good but he didn't say anything that hasn't been said on this site. I've personally made damn near all of them myself here. This really had nothing to do with academics. He arguments were common sense.
Y'all low key on some white(looking) man ice colder shyt.
#FACTS.
he killed ol boy something awful. my goodness.
How do you know when someone has lost an argument? When they keep saying the same thing over and over that has been answered multiple times yet they dont like the answer but dont have any evidence to the contrary. their next move is to go at the person they are arguing with. go at meaning.. Let me talk bad about the person vs keeping on topic.
Tucker to the Uconn professor, "so mr uconn, are tenured? so you can say anything and not get fired huh?"
so now since you lost the only argument you ever use. You try to talk about the man's personal self. Sucker move. but a move a white supremacist would use every time.
Ad hominem definition and example
Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"), short for argumentum adhominem, is a logical fallacy in which an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.
actually those facts described in that manner are not common sense. if they were more people of color would use said argument. most black folks do not know to say, their were more of us then whites back then for free labor purposes to line the pockets of the white man. now their are more people of color for the very same person, to line the pockets of the white man.
it's the very reason young Bush as president wasn't trying to kick all the illegals out. he knew being their in texas that they wanted and needed those latins, legal or illegal to provide that labor that they do not want to do. all Facts. but most people that are not scholars or not well read in race and society do not know how to put those two things together to make that parallel.
BelowTheMasonDixon
Veteran
Thank you for keeping it 100% all that Race Soldier shyt is cute until you run into someone educated and built for this social commentary life. These dudes aren't dumb ass white cats on Twitter or Reddit.
Bodied. 
Enough with the debates.
bigbadbossup2012
Biggest baddest boss
its not unusual to see a white supremacist and a suspected white supremacist work in code to make tariq seem like a lesser opponent.
Ghpstface
Kanye West fan
Dude has almost 0 content online he should promote himself more
bigbadbossup2012
Biggest baddest boss
iFightSeagullsForBread
The Working Class Hero
That shot about the bow tie fukked with him lowkey.
sportscribe
Superstar
If you read between the lines you will see Tucker espouses similar white supremacist ideologies ie whites are becoming a minority in America and the power dynamic will shift based on demographics.