Probably Edge.
actually punk's moveset and striking are as close to stiff muay thai influenced shoot style accurrate as you can get with wwe moveset limitations.
i enjoy seeing his looks stiff but is gentle execution.
namely his stero loud kicks, his enfamous knee to bulldog and slingshot springboard clothesline.
those are the good things about punk. as he actually makes the moves as close to authentically stiff as you can get in a wwe ring.
whereas most wwe performers are so neutered. it looks like they are pawing one another, most of the time.
i just don't see how you do not find his mic skills great.
nobody can recreate duhtay, and nobody can recreate flair.
yet, punk is the what if muay thai trained version of steve corrino and mike sanders, rolled into one.
that could work inring but better on the mic with hof inring psychology.
coupled with a sound stiff moveset and workrate that is as close to authentic striking wise.
you will get from a wwe performer.
if people praise hbk on the mic and his charisma.
which i personally never thought was great.
then i think punk definately, is naturally more charismatic and funnier than hbk.
with a higher level of keen psychological wit and personality inring.
who is of the same height, ilk and build as a performer.
minus the roids, to blow up his physique.
if, we straight up compared punk to hbk.
plus he has more classic matches, and ramped up faster than hbk, as a singles/tag performer.
nor is phil as overrated as hbk either.
which is more based on the gateway aesthetics of hbk's fanbase.
those hbk stans do not have an actual full knowledge of the history of wrasslin.
[most of hbk's fan picking him because of gateway aesthetics. are as delussional as if i said hulk hogun was the highest quality wrassler inring, of all time. all because he was my gateway entry into watching wrasslin]
when it comes to punk.
punk was one of the few great questionmark to next sureshot original indy talents.
that worked his way up with a high all around quality grassroots movement.
not a political campaign of bullshyt hazing and gamesmanship.
i think maybe you were not familiar with this grassroots rise to stardom.
so you are judging his talents with severe scrutiny.
after he arrived to the big dance.
which is the wrong way to go about it.
what i urge you to do is possibly go look up his ascension. then understand his series in his career.
then maybe you will appreciate what he does and how limited he is, and still produces high quality work.
art barr
Kurt Angle.
I know TSC loves the guy and he is consistent as hell. Very fun to watch, but not GOAT material
I don't need to go back and look at anything...I saw him in ROH, his brief stint in TNA and his arrival in WWE and I never got the endless amounts of hype that came with him.
I'm not saying he is a bum but he is not anywhere near what his fans and the IWC made him up to be. And giving him props with the caveat of comparing him to the sorry state of the current WWE roster pretty much makes my point. He looks better than he actually is because he is surrounded by garbage.
And I have never considered Shaun Michaels to be good on the mic at all.
damn,..so do you think the roh and tna indy guys must be garbage as well?
art barr
If he would have stayed in the E and didn't go crazy with painkillers, he would have been up there, easily.
angle's tna run >>> his wwe run
dont get caught up in the hype.
How the hell did you come up with that question from anything I wrote?
You are the one who introduced the idea that Punk was awesome by comparing him favorably to the guys he works with in WWE. I just countered with the point that you only think he is better thanhe is because the state of the current WWE roster is ass.
angle's tna run >>> his wwe run
dont get caught up in the hype.
you said he was surrounded by garbage and you watched all his work.
so if you never thought he was good.
then who is good from all the feds he was on the roster of?
i asked the question because you said he was surrounded by garbage.
on the current wwe roster which includes db or dragon.
the argueable best in the world.
plus aries and punk both had great roh encounters, as well.
whom was also on the roh roster, too.
that is why i asked,..as your answer sounds more wiki based and not on actually seeing him work.
i ask because i think you just fronting for the camera.
someone had to be infinitely better.
or, no one, you thought was talented.
when punk was on roster with during his come uppance.
punk made mark henry look good,..fukk'n mark henry.
so i don't get your answer.
i feel you just fronting,....and really don't know workrate like that.
art barr