TSC Tag Teams/Stables Evaluation #74: The Nasty Boys

Overall Rating


  • Total voters
    45

Playaz Eyez

Veteran
Joined
Sep 2, 2015
Messages
47,077
Reputation
7,890
Daps
136,751
thanks for answering. I didn't know about any of this.
but I don't think off-wax stuff should play a role in the ratings.

all of those attitude teams. and im not saying the nastys are on another level. im not even saying that theyre necessarily better. theyre on the same plane tho.

they had classics with
cactus jack & max payne
legion of doom
hart foundation
steiner bros

how many classic tag team matches came out of the attitude era that didn't involve tables, ladders & chairs?? I CANT THINK OF NOT ONE.

And yet the Hardyz, Dudleys, and Edge & Christian did more for wrestling than the Nasty Asses ever did
 

Wacky D

PROVOCATIVE POSTING
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
40,543
Reputation
508
Daps
36,642
And yet the Hardyz, Dudleys, and Edge & Christian did more for wrestling than the Nasty Asses ever did


I see you skirted way past my question. so im gonna ask it again...…..

and youre getting emotional for nothing. I could care less about the nasty boys.


And yet the Hardyz, Dudleys, and Edge & Christian did more for wrestling than the Nasty Asses ever did


and what exactly did they do for wrestling? please spear me the nostalgic WWF attitude era hyperbole.

edge was the poster-boy for over-pushed WWE superstars. part of the regime that chased viewers away.
jeff hardy - the guy who wrestled while intoxicated.
buh buh ray - known locker room a$$hole who bullies younger talents
 
Last edited:

Legal

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
16,398
Reputation
3,276
Daps
62,519
Reppin
NULL
I see you skirted way past my question. so im gonna ask it again...…..

and youre getting emotional for nothing. I could care less about the nasty boys.





and what exactly did they do for wrestling? please spear me the nostalgic WWF attitude era hyperbole.

edge was the poster-boy for over-pushed WWE superstars. part of the regime that chased viewers away.
jeff hardy - the guy who wrestled while intoxicated.
buh buh ray - known locker room a$$hole who bullies younger talents

Word?

but I don't think off-wax stuff should play a role in the ratings.

I'mma let you cook, but your troll game could use some work.
 

Ben Ovabich

All Star
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
1,037
Reputation
200
Daps
2,965
Reppin
CHICAGO
6

They had some good matches here and there... I think they're at their best when it comes to hardcore matches... I'm surprised they never stepped foot in ECW , it seem tailor made for them...
 

mrken12

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
80,804
Reputation
20,880
Daps
300,346
Reppin
Maryland
Word?



I'mma let you cook, but your troll game could use some work.
Sometimes people are willing to give passes for bad behavior if the person is talented (i.e. Shawn Michaels, CM Punk) but the Nasty Boys don't have the talent to compensate for their bad reputations.
 

Playaz Eyez

Veteran
Joined
Sep 2, 2015
Messages
47,077
Reputation
7,890
Daps
136,751
I see you skirted way past my question. so im gonna ask it again...…..

and youre getting emotional for nothing. I could care less about the nasty boys.





and what exactly did they do for wrestling? please spear me the nostalgic WWF attitude era hyperbole.

edge was the poster-boy for over-pushed WWE superstars. part of the regime that chased viewers away.
jeff hardy - the guy who wrestled while intoxicated.
buh buh ray - known locker room a$$hole who bullies younger talents

All 3 teams defined Attitude and were the first ones involved in tag team ladder/table matches in the WWF. They’re synonymous with it. I never even knew about the Nasty Boys outside of the ring, and in 2019 I don’t really care, so my take on them is purely in the ring, in which they simply weren’t very good. They had a standout gimmick, look, and were brawlers, that’s it. They were another one of those “beloved” Golden Era tag teams, but when you really step back to analyze them, they were easily the worst of those tags teams back then. They were no where near the level of the Roadwarriors, Doom, Harlem Heat, Steiners, Hart Foundation, etc. All they did was exist in an era with much better tag teams than them. To put things perspective, the Golden Era tag teams were Death Row records, but the Nasty Boys were Tha Realest.
 

Wacky D

PROVOCATIVE POSTING
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
40,543
Reputation
508
Daps
36,642
They had some good matches here and there... I think they're at their best when it comes to hardcore matches... I'm surprised they never stepped foot in ECW , it seem tailor made for them...


yea that's what im saying.

they definitely should've did a bid in ECW.


Sometimes people are willing to give passes for bad behavior if the person is talented (i.e. Shawn Michaels, CM Punk) but the Nasty Boys don't have the talent to compensate for their bad reputations.


nah. its just because theyre not childhood nostalgic pieces.

HBK doesn't just get a pass. he also somehow gets overrated.


All 3 teams defined Attitude and were the first ones involved in tag team ladder/table matches in the WWF. They’re synonymous with it. I never even knew about the Nasty Boys outside of the ring, and in 2019 I don’t really care, so my take on them is purely in the ring, in which they simply weren’t very good. They had a standout gimmick, look, and were brawlers, that’s it. They were another one of those “beloved” Golden Era tag teams, but when you really step back to analyze them, they were easily the worst of those tags teams back then. They were no where near the level of the Roadwarriors, Doom, Harlem Heat, Steiners, Hart Foundation, etc. All they did was exist in an era with much better tag teams than them. To put things perspective, the Golden Era tag teams were Death Row records, but the Nasty Boys were Tha Realest.


I asked you not to give me any attitude era hyperbole, and yet, that's the very first thing that comes off your keyboard.
I asked you what great matches have any of them had aside from being in TLC, and yet all you gave me was TLC matches.

the realest wasn't apart of golden era death row, so that analogy makes no sense.

so because they weren't road warriors/steiners level, that means they were one of the worst teams back then? IS THERE NO IN-BETWEEN?
and im not comparing them to the road warriors, steiners, doom, harts, or the harlem heat(who technically weren't around back then). im comparing them to those attitude era teams that are getting 10s despite not being any better than this team that is getting 1s. and im not even a nasty boys fan.

lol. don't even get me started on the new aged outlaws, who are on here getting all types of 10s. nasty boys were easily better than them.

and youre pushing the idea that they never stood out, when in reality they were awarded the best tag team award in 1994 by PWI.
 
Last edited:
Top