Neither of the poll options.
Like others said there are many different groups making a lot of noise, but claiming the same label.
I think the most common sense out of all the noise is simply saying that they are an ethnic group that needs a name to distinguish them since apparently "black" "black american" "African american" are now all being used in a racial context versus an ethnic context (as opposed to historically when African american was used ethnically i.e. AAVE refering to a specific group of people). So you have a dynamic where immigrants can identify with their national heritage and all the three terms (because they are black, or african, and american), but so called FBA have no distinguishing ethnonym.
These people are being drowned out by the pretendians and Nasheed people. It also doesn't help that there was not really a coherent movement addressing the above, so the nasheed people capitalized on this via grifting.
The idea is if AA is going to be used as synonymous with Black and Black American in a racial context, then a distinct name is needed in an ethnic context. So would still be under the racial umbrella, but a distinct ethnic subset alongside the other 'jamaican american, nigerian american, etc''. I supposed you can imagine how the re-imagined census would look.