Trump's self-destruction has begun

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
87,870
Reputation
3,591
Daps
156,298
Reppin
Brooklyn
Tiny SuperPAC Trolls Donald Trump About His 'Tiny Hands'

June 17, 20166:39 PM ET
ALEXANDER TIN

ASHLEY YOUNG

gettyimages-513903408_wide-8de8f891531bf3a50e1197810c8a97c0cbd37d20-s800-c85.jpg

Do these hands look small? Some of Donald Trump's opponents have tried to needle him about his hand size.

J Pat Carter/Getty Images
The latest superPAC attack ad against Donald Trump checks all of the boxes when it comes to campaign tropes. There's stock footage, an ominous soundtrack, "real" Americans.

"If the White House phone rings at 3 a.m.," the video solemnly implores viewers, in a reference to a Hillary Clinton ad from 2008, "could his little hands even pick up the receiver?"

YouTube
The frame shifts to an actor wearing a hard hat who says, "It's time our country learned every inch of the truth."

The ad comes courtesy of the Americans Against Insecure Billionaires with Tiny Hands PAC (it's real, we checked). It asks viewers to sign a petition calling on Donald Trump "to release his official hand measurements."

There's been a wave of parody and humorous political action committees like the Tiny Hands PAC that have emerged in the years since TV comedian Stephen Colbert filed the paperwork for his now-infamous "Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow" superPAC.

Trump's allegedly small hand size has been a meme since before there were memes. In 1986, satirical magazine Spy chronicled New York's obsession with business mogul Donald Trump. Spy crafted several nicknames for him throughout their writings, but it was "short-fingered vulgarian" that truly stuck.

Trump, of course, didn't take to the magazine's choice of words lightly, Graydon Carter, one of Spy magazine's founders told NPR's David Folkenflik:

"[Trump] blames me for this more than Kurt [Anderson, another Spy founder]. He'll send me pictures, tear sheets from magazines, and he did it as recently as [last] April. With a gold Sharpie, he'll circle his fingers and in his handwriting say, 'See, not so short.' And this April when he sent me one, I just — I should have held on to the thing, but I sent it right back by messenger with a note, a card stapled to the top, saying, 'Actually, quite short.' And I know it just gives him absolute fits. And now that it's become sort of part of the whole campaign rhetoric, I'm sure he wants to just kill me — with those little hands."

Former GOP presidential candidate Marco Rubio also tried to weaponize the tiny hands joke against Trump during a debate in March, although he later said he regretted it. Trump's response: "Look at those hands, are they small hands?" he said, raising them for viewers to see. "And, [Rubio] referred to my hands — 'If they're small, something else must be small.' I guarantee you there's no problem. I guarantee."

The political action committee was created in March. "We are patriotic Americans devoted to educating our fellow citizens about Donald Trump's tiny baby hands," wrote the group's treasurer, Henry Kraemer, in the filing with the Federal Election Commission.

"We're not done, if Donald Trump doesn't release his hand measurements, we're going to keep pressing," said Noah Heller, one of the group's founders.

Don't expect to see the ad in heavy rotation on cable: According to NBC/SMG Delta, the PAC spent just $1,104 to air the spot four times on MSNBC on June 14.

It costs nothing but postage to start a PAC with the FEC (although filling that account will be a bit more expensive). Simply fill out "FEC Form 1," following the instructions on the FEC's website, and await your reply.



Tiny SuperPAC Trolls Donald Trump About His 'Tiny Hands'

:wow:
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
87,870
Reputation
3,591
Daps
156,298
Reppin
Brooklyn

Trump’s Delusions of Competence



Paul Krugman MAY 27, 2016

Continue reading the main storyShare This Page
  • Donald Trump while Bernie Sanders hasn’t conceded the inevitable. Still, I was struck by several recentpolls showing Mr. Trump favored over Hillary Clinton on the question of who can best manage the economy.

    This is pretty remarkable given the incoherence and wild irresponsibility of Mr. Trump’s policy pronouncements. Granted, most voters probably don’t know anything about that, in part thanks to substance-free news coverage. But if voters don’t know anything about Mr. Trump’s policies, why their favorable impression of his economic management skills?

    The answer, I suspect, is that voters see Mr. Trump as a hugely successful businessman, and they believe that business success translates into economic expertise. They are, however, probably wrong about the first, and definitely wrong about the second: Even genuinely brilliant businesspeople are often clueless about economic policy.

    An aside: In part this is surely a partisan thing. Over the years, polls havegenerally, although not universally, shown Republicans trusted over Democrats to manage the economy, even though the economy has consistently performed better under Democratic presidents. But Republicans are much better at promoting legends — for example, by constantly hyping economic and jobs growth under Ronald Reagan, even though the Reagan record was easily surpassed under Bill Clinton.

    Back to Mr. Trump: One of the many peculiar things about his run for the White House is that it rests heavily on his claims of being a masterful businessman, yet it’s far from clear how good he really is at the “art of the deal.” Independent estimates suggest that he’s much less wealthy than he says he is, and probably has much lower income than he claims to have, too. But since he has broken with all precedents by refusing to release his tax returns, it’s impossible to resolve such disputes. (And maybe that’s why he won’t release those returns.)

    Remember, too, that Mr. Trump is a clear case of someone born on third base who imagines that he hit a triple: He inherited a fortune, and it’s far from clear that he has expanded that fortune any more than he would have if he had simply parked the money in an index fund.

    But leave questions about whether Mr. Trump is the business genius he claims to be on one side. Does business success carry with it the knowledge and instincts needed to make good economic policy? No, it doesn’t.

    True, the historical record isn’t much of a guide, since only one modern president had a previous successful career in business. And maybe Herbert Hoover was an outlier.

    But while we haven’t had many business leaders in the White House, we do know what kind of advice prominent businessmen give on economic policy. And it’s often startlingly bad, for two reasons. One is that wealthy, powerful people sometimes don’t know what they don’t know — and who’s going to tell them? The other is that a country is nothing like a corporation, and running a national economy is nothing like running a business.

    Here’s a specific, and relevant, example of the difference. Last fall, the now-presumed Republican nominee declared: “Our wages are too high. We have to compete with other countries.” Then, as has happened often in this campaign, Mr. Trump denied that he had said what he had, in fact, said — straight talker, my toupee. But never mind.

    The truth is that wage cuts are the last thing America needs right now: We sell most of what we produce to ourselves, and wage cuts would hurt domestic sales by reducing purchasing power and increasing the burden of private-sector debt. Lower wages probably wouldn’t even help the fraction of the U.S. economy that competes internationally, since they would normally lead to a stronger dollar, negating any competitive advantage.

    The point, however, is that these feedback effects from wage cuts aren’t the sort of things even very smart business leaders need to take into account to run their companies. Businesses sell stuff to other people; they don’t need to worry about the effect of their cost-cutting measures on demand for their products. Managing national economic policy, on the other hand, is all about the feedback.

    I’m not saying that business success is inherently disqualifying when it comes to policy making. A tyc00n who has enough humility to realize that he doesn’t already know all the answers, and is willing to listen to other people even when they contradict him, could do fine as an economic manager. But does this describe anyone currently running for president?

    The truth is that the idea that Donald Trump, of all people, knows how to run the U.S. economy is ludicrous. But will voters ever recognize that truth?

  • http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/27/opinion/trumps-delusions-of-competence.html
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
29,814
Reputation
4,691
Daps
66,171
Trump never wanted to be President. I'm telling you.
To follow up, Trump currently has 1.3 million dollars in cash on hand for the general and is 45 million in debt.
 

Uno

Superstar
Joined
Jan 1, 2015
Messages
7,125
Reputation
251
Daps
24,167
That Trump hustle wouldn't surprise me to see little Baron Trump on the payroll:banderas:.
 
Top