If you want to keep holding private citizens to the same standards as high ranking governmental officials, that's your prerogative, but it doesn't make sense if you're trying to build a healthy society. I can't imagine thinking admitted impropriety with classified government emails while holding the position of Secretary of State is on the same scale as a $25K bribe in a fraudulent University case. You saying "oh, there's no smoking gun
" is some mobster shyt. The presumption of innocence is ok in a courthouse where we're deciding whether to jail the person or not, but this history of scandals
while in governmental positions is legitimately alarming when we're talking about whether we should elect this person to the highest governmental position. If someone has been charged with murdering babies multiple times, but has been acquitted each time,
maaaaybe I'm going to choose someone else to babysit my kid.
edit: and by the way, I'm not talking about all the nutso conspiracy theories about the Clintons like the Vince Foster murder and that other shyt. I'm talking about her legitimate scandals like her improprieties with emails, her actions with the Clinton Foundation, her actions in Haiti as Secretary of State, etc.
:yadontsay: Trump supporters say the darndest thangs
especially 
