You can't really be this stupid. It has to be a ploy to trap really, really stupid Trump supporters, or just a troll job.
First of all, TWENTY of my examples are first-person instances of Trump making a public fool of his racist self.
Second-person isn't even relevant....what the hell do you think a second-person report of racism is?
Finally, SIXTEEN of the examples are typical third-person reporting of acts and witnesses...like virtually ALL investigative reporting.
To pretend like "it doesn't count unless you videotaped yourself and put it on youtube!" is the idiotic mentality of a 14-year-old. People don't make videos of themselves going, "Look at me being a racist in my business deals". You HAVE to do investigative third-person reporting to verify that shyt. To claim, "the only racism that counts is when I have a tape of them saying the n-word" is a stupid social-media era narrative. You probably actually believe that Eminem is more racist than Trump, because Em said the N-word on a tape once in his teenage years and Trump only says it around confidants who would never report him.
Now, on from the general stupidity to more specific stupidity. No one other than Aelways en fantile should read these posts unless they want their brain to melt a little.
He
didn't like Trump because of the racist shyt he did.
What, are we only going to believe accounts of Trump's racism if they come from people who approve of it?
And why the hell does it matter if the lyrics were in an editorial? Are you going to claim they didn't exist? Or course they exist and you can find a hundred sources to verify, including in your OWN link that you post just below that. Why throw in such a stupid red herring except just to waste time?
I still can’t tell if you’re really this dumb or just really think people are dumb enough to believe such lies.
Fred Trump was discriminating in his
RENTAL properties. People who
RENT apartments don’t get
HOME MORTGAGES. Therefore, claiming that Trump had to segregate his rental properties because the government wouldn’t have approved mortgages is as dumb a lie as it gets.
And then you criticize me for "low literacy".
Your entire pro-racism argument is based around, “Well, the FHA had some racism, therefore it doesn’t matter than Fred Trump was enthusiastically racist”.
That’s right, your own link states that he “enthusiastically” pursued racist policies. And even if racist segregation was technically legal in the 1950s when Woody Guthrie wrote his damning, shaming lyrics against Trump, it certainly wasn’t legal anymore in the 1970s when Donald Trump took over the properties and pursued the SAME racist segregation policies that overtly hurt Black people.
Liar, liar, liar.
See, this is one of the dangers of Trump. He lies so often and obviously that his followers actually believe they can get away with open, obvious lies without consequences.
He DID rent to Black tenants...but ONLY in his low-cost properties, NOT in the "nice" properties where the White people lived. It had nothing to do with "subsidized" or not.
It doesn’t even matter if those who filed complaints were welfare recipients, though I seriously doubt that they were, because after the complaints a sting was set up by the Urban League where apartments were given to White people on the same day as they had been refused to Black people with the same qualifications. And even better, you seem to completely ignore that:
* FOUR of Trump’s own agents state that applications were “coded” to show whether Black or White renters had filed them, and application approval was segregated accordingly.
* THREE of Trump’s own doormen said that they were directed to steer Black persons away from their apartment buildings by lying about rental prices or availability.
* ONE of Trump’s supervisors said that he was told to accept White applicants on-site, but direct Black applicants to the main office where they would be re-directed towards the lower-quality buildings.
You have
EIGHT of Trump’s own employees who admit the racist policies, in addition to the test cases that were sent, in addition to all the complaints. And you claim there was no evidence….because the evidence is so damning you don’t want to acknowledge it.
So now the argument is, "nothing happened without a guilty verdict"...I'm sure you apply that to every other politician too.
And your words about the settlement are just stupid.
It was one of the first uses of the Fair Housing Act EVER. The government didn’t care about forcing Trump into an “admission of guilt” so that they could list it as something to make him look bad in a later presidential run. All the government wanted to do was force him to stop being racist and give Black people a fair shot at the properties. And with all of Trump’s financial resources and deep political connections (his family had been close family friends with the mayor of New York for over 20 years and had already worked out major hand-in-hand property deals with his people), it took all the government could do to get that. But they did. And the only people who cares whether Trump gave a personal “admission of guilt” in the process were egotistic Trump and his sycophant stans.
Apparently, if someone hears Trump being racist and reports it, it doesn't count. It only counts when Trump declares his racism publicly (which he's done plenty).
And ALL reporting of racism is third-person unless the person is willing to broadcast racist views on their own. So anyone who doesn't broadcast publicly can't be called a racist by anyone else even if they hear them say and do racist things, because that's just a "third person report"?
First off, how stupid would you have to be to be alive in the business world in the 1980s and believe that Black men had a BETTER shot than White men? It’s 2016, and anyone on the Coli in the business world can tell you that’s not true NOW, much less 30 years ago.
More important, the question is WHY Trump said it. Why does a guy who has NEVER hired a Black man to be a high-level executive in his organization, who removes all the Black dealers when his racist friends come into his casinos, who calls Black people lazy by nature and laments the fact that there are Black men working in his casino as accountants, and who had a history of screwing over Black people in his business deals state that it is BETTER to be a well-educated Black man?
Did lying come naturally, or did Trump teach it to you?
Trump’s 40-years of failure to hire Black/Latino executives has almost NOTHING to do with how many Fortune 500 companies have Black CEO’s. We’re not talking about the CEOs of Fortune 500 companies. We’re talking about literally dozens of executives, maybe hundreds, at far lower levels than that.
It’s like me pointing out, “Alabama doesn’t have a single Black man anywhere on their coaching staff” and you responding, “But look at how few major colleges have Black A.D.’s! Black people must just not apply for those jobs – it’s natural!” It’s just a gigantic red herring at a completely different level.
If your responses to those seven examples are that sad, I can't imagine how weak you felt your cases against the other 30 examples were that you weren't even willing to post them.
This one too is iffy...He was sued by the DoJ but they didnt win..NO VERDICT= NO PROOF
He didnt tell the new yorker in a formal on the record interview..he was quoted by a writer of an opinion piece....What do we call the kind of information that someone tells someone else who tells someone else.......Unverifiable /gossip
...I havent found a single Fact
Ill look into it..... what a waste of time of time tho...
You see why i call you a dumbass...because YOU ARE..he used a FHA LOAN TO BUILD
WTF are you yammering about...the case was SETTLED ...WITHOUT FINDING OF GUILT
You get it now...or do i need to break out the sock puppet and crayons
