Trump to order USAID be put under the State Department (Update: 2/3/25 - Agency Locked Up, Employees Locked Out)

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
74,212
Reputation
8,651
Daps
223,281
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
I think this deserves its own thread.

As some of you know, I work on foreign assistance with an implementer. Mainly on security and rule of law work. My programs are paused during this freeze. Trying to get waivers from DOS.

My industry has been upended this week. So many people laid off or furloughed. Country offices being decimated. Every implementing contractor or non profit is being cooked right now.

WSJ reports that USAID is now going to be under DOS. Congressional Dems are saying it is illegal. This article breaks it all down.




President Trump is preparing an order to fold the U.S. Agency for International Development into the State Department, according to administration officials, previewing a move that throws the future of America’s foreign assistance into doubt as Washington battles China for influence in the developing world.

The directive, which could come as early as next week, is expected to shrink the size of the 10,000-person, $40 billion agency and rein in its autonomy, the officials said. It will give the State Department greater authority over the contracting and aid-distribution process, and put more decision-making power in the hands of Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his foreign-assistance team, officials said.

Democrats insist Trump doesn’t have the unilateral authority to restructure USAID and further erode USAID’s historically independent mission, as its existence is codified in federal law.

The deeper integration, should Trump successfully go through with it, would allow him to align foreign aid with his “America First” vision, advocates of the move say. The approach could mean fewer funds for longstanding programs to help poor nations develop their economies, strengthen the rule of law, cope with climate change and boost gender equality.

That could save billions of dollars but leave fragile societies more vulnerable and cede space to China, which has sought to influence others through its infrastructure projects around the world, former diplomats and USAID officials said.

USAID and State didn’t return requests for comment. The National Security Council at the White House declined to comment.


The idea for downsizing USAID, stripping it of its independence and merging it into the State Department has been discussed in Washington for years. The Project 2025 blueprint for the Trump administration called for fusing the two agencies together and included a proposal that would make the USAID chief simultaneously the head of State’s foreign assistance office.
Proponents of USAID say that its separate status has enabled it to focus on its assistance and development mission. The emerging Trump plan marked a sea change from the Biden administration, which sought to elevate the role of USAID and gave its head, Samantha Power, a seat on its National Security Council.

The order is already facing political challenges, and it may face legal questions since money for USAID is appropriated by Congress and its authorities are ratified in the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. While former President John F. Kennedy created USAID via an executive order, its independent status was codified in 1998 legislation and reaffirmed by Congress last year. Democrats insist that Congress must pass legislation before there is a bureaucratic reorganization.
“This’d be illegal and against our national interests,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer posted on social media Friday night as rumors about the planned order began to circulate.

Other senior Democrats, including Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D., N.H.) and Gregory Meeks (D., N.Y.), the top two Democrats on the Senate and House foreign affairs committees. urged the acting USAID boss in a Friday letter to ensure that his agency remains as separate from State as it is now.

The transition adds to the confusion at USAID, which issued “stop work” orders last week as part of a 90-day review of the U.S. aid programs. After an outcry about the broad scope of the freeze, Rubio issued a directive saying that “core life saving” programs providing medicine, medical care, food and shelter to needy countries could continue.
But multiple aid organizations, including those involved in combating AIDS, say that the execution of that order has been confusing and that some organizations haven’t received the authorization to continue spending federal dollars. Hundreds of contractors have been laid off and around 60 senior staff were put on administrative leave.

An attorney who represents contractors and nongovernmental organizations that carry out foreign assistance programs, Robert Nichols, plans to file a lawsuit next week charging that the abrupt stop-work orders violate the administrative procedures act, which prohibits arbitrary agency actions.

Alima, a French aid group that provides healthcare services across Africa, had five of its 12 programs shut down from the stop-work order, according to Susan Shepherd, a senior adviser with the group. One of those paused programs, which provides medicine and maternity care to people in Mali, heard from a USAID official in the capital of Bamako that it couldn’t use any more federal funds. That same official still hasn’t said Alima could continue using federal dollars for the program, even after the waiver, Shepherd said.
“This is pointless chaos that will result in people dying,“ she said.

The man behind the stop-work order, Peter Marocco, is expected to play an outsize role in dictating the new working arrangement of USAID under State. Marocco, who was allegedly inside the Capitol with his wife during the Jan. 6 attack, is currently leading the foreign aid office and is known as an aid skeptic.

He is currently reviewing proposals from aid programs seeking waivers so they can continue their work, State and USAID officials said, creating a bottleneck that critics say is slowing down the aid-waiver process despite Marocco’s promises internally to make decisions within 36 hours of receipt. The State Department declined to comment on behalf of Marocco.

State will also soon announce that it is shutting down consulates and other American diplomatic facilities abroad in Brazil, Germany, France and Italy. Two U.S. officials expressed concern that those closures will give China more influence in the cities Americans are leaving. One of them, Hamburg, home to a key German port, hosts a large Chinese consulate and is a major banking hub.
 

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
26,035
Reputation
8,801
Daps
138,575
www.nytimes.com
End Appears Near for U.S. Aid Agency, Democratic Lawmakers Say
Karoun Demirjian
5 - 6 minutes

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

A sense of crisis among aid groups was growing as U.S.A.I.D.’s website went dark.
A shadow of a person passes by boxes of U.S.A.I.D. relief items
U.S. Agency for International Development distributed relief aid for victims of super typhoon Haiyan in 2013.Credit...Cheryl Ravelo/Reuters

Feb. 1, 2025Updated 7:46 p.m. ET

Sign up for Your Places: Global Update. All the latest news for any part of the world you select.

The website for the U.S. Agency for International Development went dark Saturday afternoon as lawmakers and aid workers, already reeling over the recent freezes to foreign assistance and the suspension of senior officials, braced for the possibility that the agency might be shut down.

A slimmed-down page for U.S.A.I.D. appeared on the State Department’s website Saturday afternoon, suggesting that the agency’s activities — which are currently severely limited — had been brought under the State Department’s umbrella.

Democratic lawmakers and aid workers have been gripped since Friday by reports that President Trump was planning to issue an executive order dismantling the aid agency and moving its work to the State Department.

Mr. Trump has made no secret of his disdain for the scope of American foreign aid, arguing that sending taxpayer dollars overseas runs counter to his America first agenda.

By Saturday, lawmakers had received word that at least some of the U.S.A.I.D. signs at the agency’s headquarters in downtown Washington had come down, and rumors were circling that mission directors around the world were being called back to the United States. Those reports could not be independently verified.

Two U.S.A.I.D. employees, who work in the Washington headquarters and spoke on condition of anonymity because of an order barring employees from discussing any changes to the agency, said that they were working under an atmosphere of fear and chaos, and that half of the agency’s work force had been eliminated in the last week.

People familiar with the changes said that Pete Marocco, a State Department official who held multiple roles in the first Trump administration, appeared to be overseeing the gutting of the U.S.A.I.D. program.

Three other U.S.A.I.D. workers, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity, said that Gemini, an A.I. program, had been installed on their email accounts, leading to fears that deputies of Elon Musk, whom Mr. Trump tasked to run a new cost-cutting group known as the Department of Government Efficiency, were trying to surveil their activities.

State Department officials did not answer inquiries seeking to clarify the purpose of the moves, which lawmakers and aid workers said could be anything from a restructuring to an effort to significantly downsize, if not eliminate, most U.S. foreign aid programs.

But Democratic lawmakers said they feared a potentially bleak endgame for the aid agency.

“All the signals of how the senior staff have been put on administrative leave, many of the field staff and headquarters staff have been put on a gag order,” Senator Chris c00ns, Democrat of Delaware, who sits on the Senate panels on foreign relations and appropriations, said Saturday afternoon in an interview.

“It seems more like the early stages of shutting down than it does of reviewing it or merely retitling it,” he added.

U.S.A.I.D. is the government’s lead agency for humanitarian aid and development assistance. Since it was established in 1961, it has received foreign policy guidance from the State Department, but otherwise functioned as an independent entity.

Foreign assistance distributed by the agency, which supports health services, disaster relief, anti-poverty efforts and a range of other programs, makes up less than 1 percent of the government budget.

In January, the Trump administration ordered a freeze to nearly all foreign aid programs and later issued a waiver to allow programs that administer lifesaving humanitarian aid to keep functioning.

The changes to U.S.A.I.D.’s structure that staff and advocates are fearing are presenting a further complication to groups that were already scrambling to figure out how to keep programs afloat during the funding freeze.

Lawmakers have argued Mr. Trump cannot unilaterally shutter the agency legally, as the it was created by Congress and receives specific appropriations. The federal government, including U.S.A.I.D., is currently funded through March 14.

“Trump isn’t satisfied just to close programs and fire staff. He is now planning to ELIMINATE THE ENTIRE AGENCY. Maybe this weekend,” Senator Chris Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut, wrote on social media on Saturday. “That would be illegal. He cannot unilaterally close a federal agency. Another assault on the Constitution.”

Lawmakers have also warned that if U.S.A.I.D.’s operations are scaled back indefinitely, it will enable China, Russia, Iran and other U.S. adversaries to gain strategic footholds overseas that would damage U.S. security in the long term.

Sheera Frenkel, Nicholas Nehamas, Edward Wong and Michael Crowley contributed reporting.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
74,212
Reputation
8,651
Daps
223,281
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
Nah, wanna see this one ride out till the end. What's really going on with all this "aid" going to places like the Ukraine? :why: "Fighting Russia :duck::mjlol:" Need more evidence for this move to be seen as something malign. :yeshrug:
Ukraine has mostly been military and security aid. They have received economic aid plus humanitarian assistance.

I work on security and law enforcement projects. So stuff like training, outfitting tools for better investigations or fire the judiciary to efficiently manage its caseload.
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
74,212
Reputation
8,651
Daps
223,281
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
saying you know damn well they don't get audited with the same scrutiny as many other places :mjlol: the pendulum was going to swing back on USAID eventually it just happened to be when trump won lol
I work mainly on DOS projects :lupe:

USAID is obviously huge. There definitely is also overlapping projects between DOS and USAID. They don’t talk to each other in so many contexts from what I’ve observed.
 

Braman

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
14,510
Reputation
3,326
Daps
58,246
Nah, wanna see this one ride out till the end. What's really going on with all this "aid" going to places like the Ukraine? :why: "Fighting Russia :duck::mjlol:" Need more evidence for this move to be seen as something malign. :yeshrug:

This post plus the fact this thread has only 12 replies =

Holy shyt are we screwed :ohhh:

Im floored. On Reddit where the demographic is a bit more informed, this convo is raging on and has thousands of replies. This dude is disbanding an entire government agency by force. Your opinion on the agency in question is irrelevant. The precedent is what matters. Eventually -duh—he’s gonna do the same to an agency people DO care about

My goodness how do you need that explained. My goodness we’re fukked. I feel like Grimes in the episode where he’s the only who realizes Homer is a bumbling idiot
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,764
Reputation
-34,193
Daps
620,874
Reppin
The Deep State
Maybe @FAH1223 should have supported democrats instead of defending and elevating insurgent trolls and insurrectionists against mainstream establishment democrats for the last 8 years via bernie bros and related trolls who hate liberals and democrats more than republicans. Your leftist trolling, anti-neoliberal DSA tinged anti-capitalist ravings have empowered a destructive conservative revanchist neo-reagan element.

Did you not think Trump would do this?

This is you reaping and sowing.

…I wish no harm or misfortune on you. I really don’t. I know others in DC about to get hit with the hammer right now. but I hope one day you’ll be humble enough to admit you were wrong about Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris.

This is what we tried to save you from.

All you had to do was VOTE DEMOCRAT.

I dont hate you bro, but I do want some humility form you going forward. WE WERE RIGHT.
 
Top