This is being intellectually dishonest. Be specific. What did Democrats "exclusively" do to cause this climate? I'll give you 2 ways that I think they are garbage; their collusion with Wall Street and Big Pharma.I didnt cause this political landscape the democrats did... its not our fault this is literally cause : effect people mad at me but this outcome was inevitable...
Trying to paint Trump as a Hitler is laughable. He's even more of an Israel puppet than Biden. Look at who all his kids are married to.
This is being intellectually dishonest. Be specific. What did Democrats "exclusively" do to cause this climate? I'll give you 2 ways that I think they are garbage; their collusion with Wall Street and Big Pharma.
HOWEVER...the ENTIRE Republican brand is collusion with ALL big business, racism, and anti-intellectuallism.
I say this as a self-proclaimed capitalist and someone who has voted for a Republican or two.
While your run of the mill Democrat is sending us on a slow decline in quality of life, the average run of the mill Republican is taking the expressway to do it. They just have better marketing.
Stop being vague. Be specific. Offer solutions.
What have the democrats done SPECIFICALLY AND ONLY FOR OUR GROUP...
everything that's happening now was always the outcome... i didnt cause this situation they did... it's cause and effect... why y'all being so fukking retarded about this??? look at our entire history up until now, go look at it yourself dont fukking ever ask me to explain myself to you!!!
EDIT: i shouldnt have to explain how cause and effect works... y'all smarter than that with all due respect...
@YaThreadFloppedB!The thread I made got ignored yesterday, but I'm glad people are seeing this one today.
He doesn't have an answer he'll just keep deflecting and trying to spin it.I'll let you look up "protected classes" before I even respond to this dumb shyt.
It's a messageboard...there's a dialogue here. You don't want to explain your rationale, say no more. We'll let it die here.
I'll let you look up "protected classes" before I even respond to this dumb shyt.
It's a messageboard...there's a dialogue here. You don't want to explain your rationale, say no more. We'll let it die here.
tell me moreThe thread I made got ignored yesterday
Trying to paint Trump as a Hitler is laughable. He's even more of an Israel puppet than Biden. Look at who all his kids are married to.
The Real Anti-Semitism” MAN: Do you know about the connections between the Republican Party and the neo-Nazis which were revealed a few months ago—and could you talk a bit about what might be the significance of that in this context?
That was sort of an interesting phenomenon; it’s hard to know exactly how seriously to take it, but it’s certainly very real. I don’t know how many of you followed what happened with the Nazis in the Bush campaign around last August—do you know about that stuff?
There’s this part of the Bush campaign called the “Ethnic Outreach Committee,” which tries to organize ethnic minorities; obviously that doesn’t mean blacks or Hispanics, it means Ukrainians, Poles, that sort of business. And it turned out that it was being run by a bunch of East Euro- pean Nazis, Ukrainian Nazis, hysterical anti-Semites, Romanians who came out of the Iron Guard, and so on. Well, finally this got exposed; some of the people were reshuffled, some were put into other positions in the Re- publican Party—but it all just passed over very quietly. The Democrats never even raised the issue during the election campaign.37
You might ask, why? How come the Democrats never even raised the issue? Well, I think there was a very good reason for that: I think the Jewish organizations like the Anti-Defamation League basically called them off. The point is, these organizations don’t ultimately care about anti-Semitism, what they care about is opposition to the policies of Israel—in fact, opposi- tion to their own hawkish version of the policies of Israel. They’re Israeli government lobbies, essentially, and they understood that these Nazis in the Bush campaign were quite pro-Israel, so what do they care? The New Re- public, which is sort of an organ for these groups, had a very interesting ed- itorial on it. It was about anti-Semitism, and it referred to the fact that this committee was being run by anti-Semites, Holocaust deniers, Nazis and so on, and then it said: yes, that’s all true, but this is just “antique and anemic” anti-Semitism. Nazism is just “antique and anemic” anti-Semitism, not terribly important, we shouldn’t get too upset about it. And then it said: the real anti-Semitism that we ought to be worried about is in the Demo- cratic Party, which is filled with “Jew-haters”—that was the phrase they used. And part of the proof is, the Democrats were actually willing to de- bate a resolution calling for Palestinian self-determination at their National Convention, so therefore they’re “Jew-haters” and that’s the “real” anti- Semitism in America. (That was in fact the title of a book by the Director of the A.D.L., Nathan Perlmutter.) 38 Well, the Democrats got the message that they weren’t going to win any points with this, so they never raised a peep about it.
Incidentally, this is only one of the things that happened at that time— there’s another story which got even less publicity, and is even more reveal- ing. The Department of Education has a program of grants that it dispenses to fund projects initiated by local school systems, and for the last four or five years the school board in Brookline, Massachusetts, has been trying to get funding for a project on the Holocaust which always gets very favorably reviewed, but is always turned down. Again in 1988—also right before the election—the federal reviewing committee had to deal with their proposal. As usual it got very favorable reviews, but instead of just turning it down, 52 U n d e r s t a n d i n g P o w e r this time the government simply eliminated the entire program category under which it was being submitted. Well, at that point some information began to surface as to why the project kept getting turned down—and it turned out that it was being refused every year because of letters the De- partment was getting from people like Phyllis Schlafly [a right-wing ac- tivist] attacking it for being unfair because it didn’t give adequate space to Nazis and Ku Klux Klan members. Besides, they said, it’s kind of brain- washing children, and turning them against things like the Holocaust, it’s just more of this neo-liberal tampering with people’s thoughts. Parts of these letters actually got published in the Washington Post and the Boston Globe.39
Well, you’d have thought there’d be an uproar. A program on the Holo- caust gets turned down by the government, by the Reagan administration, because it doesn’t give enough space to Nazis and Klan members? Not a peep, not a peep. And the point is, Phyllis Schlafly and that whole gang are adequately pro-Israel—and therefore it doesn’t matter what they think. They can be in favor of the Klan, they can be in favor of the Nazis, they can say you shouldn’t be allowed to teach the Holocaust, it doesn’t matter, as long as they remain sufficiently supportive of hawkish Israeli policies. As long as they meet that qualification, it’s fine, they can say whatever they want
You cannot be this slow breh