Pegasus Jackson
Trump's Amerikkka
Media manipulation on both sides.
A sad state considering this cac’s general composition…Don't go by this. The polls are still super close.
I go to electoral-vote.com. They have Harris with 276 EVs right now. That's way, way, way too close for comfort.
I can’t laugh because dude is still neck to neck in the polls
I don’t want to jinx anything but I’m pretty sure the polls are close by design. Pollsters don’t want to be terribly wrong. Which is why they have 7-8 states a 1 to 2% difference so they can say they were within the margin of error. From everything I’ve heard on the ground, I don’t think this will be particularly close at all.Don't go by this. The polls are still super close.
I go to electoral-vote.com. They have Harris with 276 EVs right now. That's way, way, way too close for comfort.
But you’re the dumbass here. Why? You just displayed to the public the inability to make a simple decision. Clearly you need help. Pm for support.If he still wins after the clowning of rallies....all I gotta say is people gotta stop focusing on optics as clear and concise visuals for overall support.
To the dumbasses that think I'm pro Trump I ain't.
And to the dumbasses that think I'm pro Kamala I ain't.
fukk em both
Today she's no longer in the lead: (source: ElectoralVote). Like I said last week, this thing is still way too close (it's basically tied). I don't see the point in just wishing away the fact that it's still this close. I couldn't paste the EV totals, but the below amounts to a 251/251 tie and 36 EVs where their poll numbers are tied. It's a straight tie right now.I don’t want to jinx anything but I’m pretty sure the polls are close by design. Pollsters don’t want to be terribly wrong. Which is why they have 7-8 states a 1 to 2% difference so they can say they were within the margin of error. From everything I’ve heard on the ground, I don’t think this will be particularly close at all.
I addressed my view on the polls in the post you quoted. After 2016 they never want to be that wrong again. We'll see how it turns out come election day. But I'm glad people believe it's close, that way they'll get out and vote.Today she's no longer in the lead: (source: ElectoralVote). Like I said last week, this thing is still way too close (it's basically tied). I don't see the point in just wishing away the fact that it's still this close. I couldn't paste the EV totals, but the below amounts to a 251/251 tie and 36 EVs where their poll numbers are tied. It's a straight tie right now.
They definitely did make some adjustments because the polls in 2016 were wrong. But that's the point - the polling methodology back then was undercounting Trump voters. The methodology now is more accurate. It can still turn one way or another because we have a few weeks left, but I believe these polls aren't far off from the true numbers, unfortunately.I addressed my view on the polls in the post you quoted. After 2016 they never want to be that wrong again. We'll see how it turns out come election day. But I'm glad people believe it's close, that way they'll get out and vote.
no, it isn’t.Today she's no longer in the lead: (source: ElectoralVote). Like I said last week, this thing is still way too close (it's basically tied). I don't see the point in just wishing away the fact that it's still this close. I couldn't paste the EV totals, but the below amounts to a 251/251 tie and 36 EVs where their poll numbers are tied. It's a straight tie right now.
Wouldn't it be better to give credence to these polls and move with the urgency they suggest rather than pretend it's going to be a blowout and then be unpleasantly surprised on election night? What's the point of that?no, it isn’t.