no "fake news" allowed this needs to be movement
Nah, it's actually because he thought he was going to have more time. But then some other shyt got in the way, and he invaded anyways.Probably for that same exact reason. To achieve something his predecessor did not.
I'm torn. Like on one hand its wrong for him to ban the media outlets who don't kiss his ass. But on the other hand, I don't feel bad becasue the media covered up and gave alternative facts during all the killings of black people. And during protest. They called them thugs and cut off people who didn't cheerlead for cops. And the cops tried to ban the media from some of the protest. They do that shyt all the time. Posting up a black victims mug shots, pics of them smoking, drinking with middle fingers up. But post nice pics of a white criminals smiling, beach pics. Donald Trump is an a$$hole but the media needs to suck it up. I bet they have more foul stuff of Trump they could release but they rather dig up old closed rape cases on Nate Parker when he decided to do the Birth of a Nation movie. Or when they made excuses & glossed over Ryan Lochte 'robbery story' me and other people heard that story and saw the holes in that story but they made excuses for him.
Okay, so when the press does something you don't like - it becomes okay to step over the Constitution?
You're not torn, you just have no concept of how America works.
I saw what you said. It was just a very dumb post and you didn't understand my criticism.Umm no. In the first line I said its wrong to ban the media because you don't like what they say, in the next I gave an examples of the media pushing its own agenda. I'll post it again so you can read it, becasue you obviously didn't read the whole thing the first time.
"Like on one hand its wrong for him to ban the media outlets who don't kiss his ass.
But on the other hand, I don't feel bad becasue the media covered up and gave alternative facts during all the killings of black people"
For the thousandth time he only cut off the outlets that report and embellish every single thing he does
The media will still cover Donald J Trump's presidency
On Friday, media groups including the BBC, CNN, the New York Times, the Guardian, the Los Angeles Times, Buzzfeed, the Daily Mail and Politico were among those barred from an off-camera informal briefing held by White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer.
I saw what you said. It was just a very dumb post and you didn't understand my criticism.
You said you were "torn" which implies you were waivering between whether or not it was okay for Trump to do what he's doing. Gtfo with that the media demonized him TOO much, well look what he does, he deserves every bit of that. You're implying that the media shouldn't have spent time covering all the terrible things he's done, and that they're somehow equally evil by doing so. Suspiciously alt-right.
"On one hand it's wrong for him to ban media" is the end of the discussion and all the evidence you used after that to show that the media is somehow at all on level with the evils of the trump administration is stupid and shows a poor understanding of how America functions