He's exactly right though..what so called "fake news" did they present? I'm genuinely curious if you have any examples.
He isn't though, he's completely wrong. But I guess it depends on the side of the pendelum that you side with.
"Fake news" IMO pertains to the omission of facts as a way of telling a lie or a half truth. Take the Russian collaboration for example. First, months ago, they had a litany of articles talking about how "the Russians" fixed the election for Trump,...they embellished on the whole "interference in a national election" angle to cover up the corruption within the party itself (something that has yet to be addressed or corrected by the Press or the Democrats). Nevermind that the "recount" (another fake accusation) found that voting machines and voting counts weren't hacked by anyone--but that the man won fair and square (something that they refuse to admit to this day) by even a larger margin than he did the first time.
Instead, they've decided to double down with this whole narrative of his having "embarrassing intel" on him, and having the public think and/or believe that there was some hidden video of him being a sexual deviant. Then they try to collude with this narrative of Michael Flynn breaching protocol (which he did) by discussing sanctions with the Russian ambassador as if it fit into the conspiracy of some sort of back alley dealings that involve some degree of corruption. This is an all out effort to create this cloud of speculation of Russia controlling the office of he Presidency by proxy.
Nevermind that the story about the intel was completely unverified, nevermind that the Russian "hacking" (it was actually a fishing scam that Podesta opened up on an unprotected server) that exposed corruption within the party. Nevermind that Hillary approved of the selling of a large percentage of our Uranium supplies to the Russians years before. They'd prefer to run with whatever wild story that they can get their hand on, knowing that their are idiots on the left who will literally believe anything, because they are still reeling from the lost of the election, and they will link themselves to any vessel to avoid to simply admitting that they were wrong from day one about it.
I mean I could go on and on about this.
Just take a look at the whole "Muslim Ban" narrative that they ran with. Nevermind, that out of the world's 40+ predominantly Islamic countries can travel, conduct business and have strong diplomatic relations with the US weren't on the list, nevermind that the "hold" was for a 3 month process on a selection of 7 countries carried over from the previous administration to improve on the vetting process from a few decentralized countries that are currently unstable...the left wants to run with the narrative that Trump is a Nazi lol...and he wants to ban muslims and immigrants...The man was clearly
wide eyed and loud and said that he wanted to deport "illegal immigrants with criminal records (primarily with violent felonies) and the media (CNN, NYTs, WP etc etc) conveniently continue to print this false narrative of some war on barring "immigrants" to make it appear as some sort of fascist xenophobic rise of the 4th Reich lol.
I mean it's one thing to disagree, but certain media outlets are purposely omitting facts and/or mischaracterizing the issues to push a very partisan viewpoint. it just so happens that the very same outlets are the ones that wholeheartedly and openly sponsored and endorsed Hillary CLinton.