Oh I thought you meant the whistleblower identity was corroboratedHuh? Sondland himself said that Trump was trying to extort Ukraine. Volker, Amb Yovanovitch, Fiona Hill etc.
Oh I thought you meant the whistleblower identity was corroboratedHuh? Sondland himself said that Trump was trying to extort Ukraine. Volker, Amb Yovanovitch, Fiona Hill etc.
Yesterday I said I didn't agree with them withdrawing the other subpoena unless there was another play, I get what that is now. The D's know the strategy is to tie them up with litigation. They currently have an open case against McGahn on subpoena compliance/executive privilege, that case is being fast tracked so they aren't wasting time with any other cases. When the McGahn case is resolved, that is going to set the precedent for complying with the subpoena, so at that point, you get a subpoena and you don't comply they have lawful precedent to hand you an L of some kind.
So should we continue our conservative outreach programs?Ive said it before, Republicans hate the dems more than Trump ever will.
Barr can't predict the future on this. Mueller was done.Why would Barr not do that though? He basically did that with the Mueller report. Really weird.
Aides to Ukraine’s leader, Volodymyr Zelensky, decided that military aid and support for peace talks outweighed the risks of appearing to take sides in American politics.