Trump IMPEACHED by the US House; US Senate Trial Allows No New Witnesses & Acquits Trump

[Jhoon]

This shyt ain't over

I'm so upset man.

People fukking LIT. ME. UP. over this for YEARS.

@dtownreppin214 @88m3 @2Quik4UHoes

We were all ahead on this.

Russia declared war on the USA in 2014...

The US declared war back in 91. The question we have to ask ourselves is: was it worth it?

We see how far one political party is willing to go. Now that we know they information, what are we going to do about it?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

 

[Blackfyre]

@mkraju
Jim Jordan said Republicans have a Saturday deadline to request witnesses testify publicly - and the GOP will request the whistleblower come forward. But Dems make the call on who will testify
10:11 - 7 Nov 2019

 

[AZBeauty]

Even though the whistleblower has been corroborated, this is just to put him/her in danger. Party of patriots my ass.

 

[CSquare43]

Even thought the whistleblower has been corroborated, this is just to put him/her in danger. Party of patriots my ass.

It's disgusting. Party over Process.

 

[Hood Critic]

I can't wait for the next generation to get into Congress because the WB would troll both Jordan and Paul by dropping this in their inbox:

 

[Blackfyre]

@mkraju
House Intel official says John Bolton was NOT subpoenaed today because “his counsel has informed us that unlike three other dedicated public servants who worked for him on the NSC and have complied with lawful subpoenas, Mr. Bolton would take us to court if we subpoenaed him.”
11:42 - 7 Nov 2019

 

[Dorian Breh]

But why would you not subpoena a guy because he will take you to court if you do? Are they really that hard up for budget?

 

[BigMoneyGrip]

Even though the whistleblower has been corroborated, this is just to put him/her in danger. Party of patriots my ass.

Who corroborated the whistleblower? Non of the media is confirming the name.

 

[Worthless Loser]

But why would you not subpoena a guy because he will take you to court if you do? Are they really that hard up for budget?

My guess is Bolton's boy is already asking a federal judge if he has to testify. Assuming the judge says yes, both him and Bolton will testify.

I can't figure out Bolton. He hates Trump but probably hates Democrats even more.

 

[Jhoon]

But why would you not subpoena a guy because he will take you to court if you do? Are they really that hard up for budget?

Because it’s a waste of fukking time. They don’t need him to impeach the president.

 

[Jhoon]

My guess is Bolton's boy is already asking a federal judge if he has to testify. Assuming the judge says yes, both him and Bolton will testify.

I can't figure out Bolton. He hates Trump but probably hates Democrats even more.

Bolton taught Russians the benefits of the second amendment. The guy didn’t realize he was a pawn.

it’s like Ellen asking me to come to her house as a stripper.

 

[Pressure]

But why would you not subpoena a guy because he will take you to court if you do? Are they really that hard up for budget?

It's probably a waste of time. How many people do you actually need corroborating the same thing until it's enough.

I fully expect a lot of this to play out again in the senate trial and a lot of these people will be compelled to testify.

 

[88m3]

But why would you not subpoena a guy because he will take you to court if you do? Are they really that hard up for budget?

the answer is time unfortunately

 

[AZBeauty]

Who corroborated the whistleblower? Non of the media is confirming the name.

Huh? Sondland himself said that Trump was trying to extort Ukraine. Volker, Amb Yovanovitch, Fiona Hill etc.